Town Council Ends OVCN member parking on Buena Vista and Concordia ROW

Council takes long-awaited action
Last week, the Oro Valley Town Council voted unanimously to ban parking on the right of way along Calle Buena Vista from Hardy Road and to extend no parking on Calle Concordia to Calle El Milagro [See panel below-right]. This is the area where the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) is located.

Residents raise safety concerns
The situation has existed for years, with residents’ pleas for relief largely ignored until now.  Residents speaking at the Council meeting described hazards created by street parking. Karen Steinbrun said the street is heavily used by “bicyclists and also people riding horses,” adding that “I think it is a safety issue because it’s an area for walking.” Longtime resident Tricia Tozer recalled a near accident during a church event: “They were parked the entire length of Buena Vista… a man and his child darted out between a truck… if I hadn’t been going five miles an hour, what would have happened?” David Diver, who lives across from OVCN, called it “like the great escape when the church lets out… everybody peels out of there because they can’t wait to get away and that makes it even more dangerous”.

Keesler: Street parking is about convenience, not necessity
Town Engineer Paul Keesler explained that OVCN has adequate on-site parking and an agreement with CDO High School for overflow. He said the issue is convenience: “It’s more… a matter of parking out there so they can get out quicker”.

Council weighs scope of restrictions
Vice Mayor Barrett moved to extend no-parking restrictions along Calle Buena Vista from Linda Vista to Hardy Road, and along Calle Concordia to El Milagro. She said intersections make clearer boundaries than “some random place where you’re going, ‘Can I park here? I don’t know’.”

Considered impact on adjacent neighborhoods
Councilmember Murphy supported the action but cautioned against shifting the problem: “I don’t want to solve this safety issue only to push it further out and create a safety issue in adjacent neighborhoods.” Keesler acknowledged the risk: “If you blocked off all of the streets, I would imagine you’re gonna push it into Shadow Mountain Estates. So you will be pushing, you will be moving that around a little bit”. Mayor Winfield added that he would speak with OVCN’s pastor about encouraging attendees not to park on neighborhood streets.
Council decision
The Council approved the motion unanimously, 7–0, to extend no-parking zones along both Calle Buena Vista and Calle Concordia. The action aims to improve access and visibility for neighbors, cyclists, and drivers, while OVCN retains on-site and overflow parking options.

Bits and Pieces

Council meeting action on OVCN new sanctuary height likely violated the Open Meeting Law

The April 16, 2025 Council agenda improperly combined a motion to reconsider with a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on the underlying item—the appeal of the Church of the Nazarene’s requested building height. Under Robert’s Rules of Order, which the Council follows, a motion to reconsider is a procedural vote that must occur separately from any debate or action on the substance of the item. While Robert’s Rules does not require that the subsequent hearing be held at a future meeting, it does require that the procedural vote and the item discussion be clearly distinct. This did not happen at the meeting.

In public bodies like Oro Valley, Arizona’s Open Meeting Law adds an additional requirement: agendas must clearly and specifically notify the public of what will be discussed and acted upon. By listing all steps—reconsideration, public hearing, and action—within a single agenda item and moving forward with a final vote that same night, the Council failed to follow proper procedure and denied residents fair notice and opportunity to participate.

Town Manager’s Recommended Budget for fiscal year 2025/26 released

ORO VALLEY, Ariz. (April 30, 2025) – The Town of Oro Valley Town Manager’s Recommended Budget for fiscal year (FY) 2025/26 is now available online. Click here to view the full budget document.

 

The General Fund, the Town’s main operating fund, totals $53.9 million, reflecting a 1.5% increase from the prior fiscal year. The total budget across all funds—including highway, water, stormwater, parks and recreation, grants, debt service, and capital—is $147.1 million, a 2.5% decrease from FY 2024/25." (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

Register for the spring tour of historic homes
On May 10, the Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation will use the patio at the Pusch House Museum to register participants for their annual spring tour of historic homes, this time in Oracle. There are iconic homes on the self-guided tour, and the Pusch House is where everyone will start. Registration is from 9 a.m. to noon, and participants will be given wristbands, maps, and shoe covers. Learn more about this tour.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Council reaffirms OVCN 36-foot height approval

At this past Wednesday’s Town Council meeting, the Council voted to affirm its earlier decision to approve a 36-foot height for the future sanctuary planned by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene. The reconsideration was brought forward by Councilmembers Robb and Nicholson. After public comment and discussion, the Council ultimately chose not to change course. A full LOVE article analyzing the discussion and vote will follow soon.

HB 2447 limits public hearings in cases where applications meet codified, measurable standards

At this same meeting, former Council Member Solomon, speaking against reconsideration, said that a “new state law just passed which places limits on local elected officials’ reviews and approvals of development plans.” We believe the bill to which he is referring is Arizona House Bill 2447.  The bill was signed by the Governor on March 31, 2025. The bill requires that cities and towns adopt procedures for administrative (staff-level) review and approval of development and design applications using objective, measurable standards. This means that if a proposal meets those predefined standards, it can be approved without requiring a public hearing or discretionary vote by a board or commission. While the bill doesn’t explicitly prohibit public hearings, it shifts more decision-making authority to staff, thereby reducing opportunities for public input in cases that are deemed compliant with objective criteria. (Article on April 21, 2025).

LOVE reporting on the 2026 fiscal budget starts soon

The Town’s fiscal year 2026 budget process is in full swing. We expect the Town Manager to issue his recommended budget later this month. The Town Council will then hold a budget study session on April 30 at 6 p.m. in Town Council Chambers, followed by another session on May 5 at 6 p.m. These meetings are especially informative, as each department manager presents their budget along with an explanation of why their requests are justified. As we’ve done for many years, LOVE will provide detailed analysis as the budget process unfolds.

Highlights from the April town manager report

Each month, the town manager issues a report to Council. This month the report notes that the town continues to move forward on key infrastructure and community projects. The Magee Road improvement project is underway with nighttime work scheduled through mid-May. The Oro Valley Town Court renovation is nearing completion, with a secure prisoner transfer area up next. Pedestrian safety upgrades are also beginning this month in the Marketplace area as part of a prior rezoning condition. The town also saw a sharp increase in traffic enforcement. Officers made 7,144 more traffic stops in 2024 compared to the same period in 2023. This was described in the report as a “significant increase” and part of a department-wide effort to reduce injuries and property damage from collisions.

Recreation fee increases in process…possible implementation in the fall

Parks and Recreation staff presented proposed fee increases for various facilities to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board this past Tuesday. Most community center membership and facility rental fees—some unchanged since 2013—would rise under the plan. Resident and non-profit users would pay lower rates than non-residents and for-profits. Staff will hold a Zoom community meeting on July 9 to gather public feedback. No action can be taken until the Town Council approves the changes.

The Senate bill referenced during the reconsideration discussion was SB 1162. It was mentioned by Councilmember Nicholson as one of the reasons for bringing the item back for discussion. Nicholson explained that the bill could have implications for how height-related zoning decisions are reviewed or challenged in the future.

Parks and Recreation receives two grants

According to Town Manager Wilkins in his report to the council Wednesday the town's Parks and Recreation staff secured a $30,000 grant to assess the Proctor-Lieber House at Steam Pump Ranch and another grant from Arizona Game and Fish to support a new shade structure for the archery area at Naranja Park. 

10th annual ‘Roundup at the Ranch’ adds 10K distance and afterparty May 17

"Lace up your shoes and get ready to round up some fun! The Town of Oro Valley invites community members of all ages to participate in the 10th Annual Roundup at the Ranch 5K/10K Run/Walk on Saturday evening, May 17, 2025." (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Children’s Museum reports growth, outreach, and unique new exhibits 

At the April 2, 2025 Town Council meeting, Hillary Van Alsburg, Executive director of the Children’s Museum, delivered an update highlighting the museum’s continued growth and community outreach. She reported that over 31,000 people visited the museum at Tohono Chul in the past year, and nearly 3,000 attended the “Chillin at the Chul” program. Additional outreach brought activities to five Oro Valley parks, reaching nearly 200 children, and special events like “Hallow Halloween” and the Oro Valley 50th Anniversary Parade drew 1,800 participants. New educational features were introduced, including “Ready-Set-Explore” backpacks for garden exploration and monthly clay art sessions with professional artists. She also previewed upcoming additions such as an agriculture-themed play area, the La Comunidad pretend market space, and a new prickly pear exhibit—reportedly the only one of its kind in the world. Learn more about the Children’s Museum.

“Serving with Compassion—Not at the Expense of Neighbors”

Resident Vicki Tarris sent us thoughts regarding the OVCN proposed sanctuary height meeting. About fourteen church member spoke at the meeting.  

"I listened to the Town Council meeting on April 2, 2025. A lot of people from OVCN came to give testimonials on what OVCN means in their life.  I am really happy that so many people have found OVCN to meet their spiritual needs.

 

However, they implied that OVCN was the only church in town that offers children’s programs and helps the needy.

 

I am happy to say that I get a great deal of spiritual comfort from my own church.  We also have a very active children's program. We also feed the homeless. We also help the poor. We also have numerous ways that people can become involved.

 

However, the one way that my church differs from OVCN is that my church does not deliberately harm their neighbors!"

Solomon urged unity—if you agree with OVCN

Former town council member Steve Solomon spoke passionately in support of OVCN during the April 2 meeting. He described the church as “amazing” and shared how it had positively transformed his life. He expressed admiration for the church’s outreach and missions—specifically mentioning a woman he met at work who was going to Guatemala to teach women how to sew. Solomon emphasized the importance of kindness and community, saying, “We just need to love each other and be kind and get along.” 

- - -

Five Oddities

Five oddities
Yesterday we reported our fact-based analysis of the decision by the Town Council to overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the height permitted for the new Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) sanctuary. As we reported, the Council approved a 36-foot height. But what we didn’t report were the oddities we observed during that meeting. There were many—but here are our top five:

Council ignores four years of input from residents
The residents most directly impacted by the decision have been attending Council meetings and speaking during the “Call to Audience” portion for the past four years. They have consistently voiced concerns about the church's expansion. None of this was acknowledged by the Council during last week’s discussion. Instead, Mayor Winfield referred to an impromptu “survey” based on emails he received just days before the meeting, regarding the church’s request for a continuance. He reported that 10 of the 13 emails he received supported granting the continuance. He gave full weight to these last-minute emails rather than four years of sustained public comment. The rest of the Council went along with it.

What happened during the five-minute timeout, and why did Barrett change her mind?
After spending considerable time making an impassioned plea for a 29-foot height limit, Vice Mayor Barrett asked for a five-minute recess to reconsider. Her words were: “Can I ask for us to take a five-minute break? I just—I really want to think for a minute.” Some have speculated that she may have been influenced during that break by one or more Council members, but there is no evidence of that, and such speculation is not helpful without proof. Still, taking a break to reflect isn’t wrong—but it does invite speculation when a clear change in position follows so closely afterward.

The "Clifton Matter:" Why was it brought up at the same time?
It seemed odd that the Clifton matter was discussed during the executive session just before the public discussion of the OVCN height appeal. The Clifton case involves a court ruling against the Town, where the court found that a town body—specifically the Board of Adjustment—erred in a height-related decision. The Town not only lost the case but was ordered to pay Clifton's legal fees and costs of about $19,000. Immediately after the executive session, the Council voted to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission OVCN height ruling. It’s hard to ignore the timing: A height-related legal loss followed by a sensitive height decision in public session. It makes one wonder whether town attorneys were subtly signaling the Council to avoid a possible courtroom setback. If so, the Council followed that signal precisely.

Robb voted "Yes”
Councilmember Robb lives directly across from the church property and is personally affected by the decision. Rather than standing with the Concordia-Buena Vista group, which opposed the height increase, she voted in favor of it. Her decision was in sharp contrast to Councilmember Greene, an OVCN member, who celebrated openly after the vote. Perhaps Robb believed the outcome was inevitable and decided to go along with it. But as the saying goes: "Never go along just to get along."

OVCN snatches victory from the jaws of defeat
OVCN came to the meeting hoping for a continuance, fearing the Council might reject their height request. Instead, by the end of the night, they got everything they wanted—approval for the full 36 feet. The residents, meanwhile, got nothing. In fact, their concerns weren’t even a factor in the Council’s discussion. Not once did anyone on the dais speak to the repeated objections and long-standing input from affected neighbors.

Yes, it was a strange night, indeed.
- - -

OVCN Gets 36-Foot Height Approval as Council Sidesteps Conflict, Overrides Commission

Town Council approved 36-foot height for new OVCN sanctuary
After a two-and-a-half-hour discussion last Wednesday, the Oro Valley Town Council approved a maximum height of 36 feet for a new sanctuary building planned by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN). In doing so, the Council overruled the Planning and Zoning Commission’s earlier decision, which had limited the building height to 24 feet. For comparison, the church’s existing sanctuary stands at 29 feet.

But not without "drama"
As previously reported, OVCN had requested an eight-month continuance to submit a more complete set of conceptual plans. Church representatives argued that pairing the height request with a full development plan would give the Council and the public more context—particularly regarding traffic, parking, drainage, and landscaping.

However, as Vice Mayor Melanie Barrett noted during the discussion, the Town already had sufficient information to decide the height question. “We know what the height is. We have the plans. We are not lacking information to make a decision on height,” she said, adding that the site’s context and the Planning and Zoning Commission’s findings gave the Council what it needed to act now.

After denying a continuance ...
After hearing 16 public comments—both for and against the continuance—the Council narrowly voted 4–3 to deny the delay. The motion to continue was made by Mayor Joe Winfield, who believed the additional time and planning detail would help the Council reach a better decision. Barrett’s position prevailed, and she was joined by Councilmembers Nicholson, Robb, and Jones-Ivey in voting no.

…Attention turned to the height request
With the continuance denied, the Council turned its attention to the appeal itself—specifically, whether to uphold or overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of the height exception. The Council chose not to deliberate on whether the Commission had erred. Instead, they bypassed that issue and directly overruled the decision, granting a modified height exception.

Barrett proposed a 29-foot option
During that discussion, Vice Mayor Barrett proposed limiting the height to 29 feet—the same as the existing sanctuary. She noted that this would have been consistent with what the church had previously offered earlier in the process. Given our understanding of the situation, we have little doubt that had she remained firm, that suggestion would have passed.

But then, late in the game, Barrett took a huge “leap of faith”
However, Barrett later withdrew that suggestion and agreed to support the 36-foot height limit—but only on the condition that OVCN make a genuine effort to work with nearby residents to address their concerns. She emphasized that while she supported the increased height in this case, it came with the expectation that the church would actively engage the community and demonstrate responsiveness going forward.

“If the Town Council grants the 36 feet, you will still go through a development plan review process and work with neighbors and address any traffic concerns such as potential road widening, parking issues, etc., correct?” she asked. OVCN’s representative responded that they would be happy to do so.

However, according to individuals who oppose the height request, OVCN’s history of working with neighbors over the past four years has been anything but forthright.

Council approved 36' height
The final motion, which passed unanimously, stated:

“I move to overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission denial of the building height increase request and conditionally grant a building height increase of 36 feet maximum, including conditions one, two, and four.”

These conditions require that the new building not exceed 36 feet in height as shown in the submitted plans, that a future development plan must align with this height approval, and that the height limit excludes rooftop features like parapets or mechanical screens.

Much to the joy of Councilmember Greene who, despite clear ethicL conflict, voted and then celebrated OVCN victory
Councilmember Mo Greene is a member of OVCN. Despite this clear ethical conflict of interest, Greene did not recuse himself from the vote, nor did any councilmember raise the issue. Instead, Green voted in favor of the church’s request and, when the motion passed, applauded and raised his hand in celebration toward the audience. His reaction is captured in the panel at left.

Fortunately, Barrett spared the Planning and Zoning Commission from rehashing a height request it already rejected
The next step is for the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene to submit a development plan. That plan will first be reviewed by Town staff, then by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and finally by the Town Council.

Vice Mayor Barrett’s insistence on deciding the height now—rather than postponing the matter—ensured that the final decision rested with the Council, not the Commission, which had already reviewed and rejected the height request earlier this year.

Residents will have additional opportunities to participate during the upcoming development plan process.
- - -

OVCN’s Campus Expansion Efforts Marked By Delays and Strategy Shifts

Tonite’s council meeting may bring another delay
Tonite, the Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to grant the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene yet another postponement. This one is a delay of a possible council decision to overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission's recent denial of a height request for a new building. Postponements are the hallmark of OVCN. They seem to request one every time things are not going well for them.

Four years of delay and suspense
That is the history based on our review of their efforts to enlarge their current location over the past four years. The Town has granted a number of postponements to give OVCN more time to pursue its objective to somehow and in some way enlarge its facility—and at the same time extend the suspense for the many residents who oppose their efforts.

Initial proposal aimed to build a full sports complex
In early 2022, OVCN submitted a rezoning request to transform its campus with the addition of a sports complex. The initial plan included a full-sized football/soccer field and other athletic facilities. The proposal quickly drew opposition from nearby residents, who cited traffic, lighting, noise, and loss of neighborhood character as major concerns. Fourteen neighbors submitted a formal opposition letter to the Town on March 1, 2022.

First postponement: no Planning & Zoning hearing in 2022
Despite these concerns, the application moved forward. A Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) hearing was originally expected in 2022, but OVCN requested a delay. Town staff announced that the hearing would not occur before January 2023. This marked the first of multiple postponements that would stretch the process out for years.

Resident frustrations grew as proposal remained active
In October 2022, the Town facilitated a meeting between OVCN and affected neighbors. Residents reiterated their opposition to any version of the project. They pointed out that OVCN had previously removed trees and gates that were part of its original development agreement—actions that contributed to distrust. Some residents also noted that town staff appeared to be working with OVCN to “find a compromise,” even contacting neighbors directly after the meeting to negotiate support. These efforts were unsuccessful.

Second postponement: OVCN delays again in 2023
By early 2023, OVCN had not withdrawn the rezoning application but again postponed its progress. Town staff indicated in February 2023 that OVCN had requested more time. The item was not scheduled for the March or April agendas. Over the next few months, the proposal remained on hold, with no public movement.

Third postponement: still no hearing by late 2023
As of late 2023, the application remained pending with no scheduled PZC hearing. In October, Town staff again confirmed that the delay was at OVCN’s request. Residents expressed frustration with the lack of transparency, noting that the church continued to revise its plans behind closed doors. The rezoning request still had not been withdrawn. It is today laying nascent in the queue.

New proposal avoids rezoning, raises new concerns
In 2024, OVCN changed its approach. Rather than pursuing rezoning for a sports complex, it introduced a plan to build a 40-foot-tall sanctuary, a student center, a maintenance building, and over 800 paved parking spaces. These were all permitted under existing zoning, with the exception of the sanctuary height, which would require a variance. Town staff confirmed the height request would be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment. Meanwhile, the original rezoning request stayed “on hold.”

Neighbors fear sports complex is still the goal
Residents questioned whether the sanctuary might eventually become an indoor sports facility—especially since the original request included such a structure. Concerns also included additional traffic, parking congestion, and the size of the project. In August 2024, neighbors attended a meeting with OVCN but left disappointed. The church presented no specific site plan and asked for general feedback, saying final decisions had not been made.

Questionable outreach efforts and neighbor response
Following that August 2024 meeting, OVCN sent a form letter to neighbors suggesting it had not heard back from them—despite their attendance at the meeting. Residents saw this as a misleading outreach effort. Longtime neighbor Tricia Tozier stated publicly that she felt OVCN had no real intention of listening. The meeting did little to reduce neighborhood opposition.

Another postponement
The Planning and Zoning Commission rejected the OVCN request for a height variance in January. OVCN appealed that decision to the Town Council. When the hearing came up in late January, OVCN asked for yet another postponement—this time because they had hired new legal counsel. The hearing was rescheduled for tonight.

And a request for yet another postponement to be heard tonight
Then, several weeks ago, OVCN asked for a postponement of this hearing. It doesn’t matter why. We have reported why. It doesn’t matter why they want it. It matters that they want it. Our surmise is that they want more time to work the system, to work the neighbors, and to build a legal basis for a possible future legal challenge.

Tonight the council can say "No"

- - -

Want to learn more? Read our years long coverage.

Bits and Pieces

OVCN uses added time to try to strengthen their case

A reader wrote to us expressing concern over the Town Council’s decision last week to grant the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) an additional six weeks to present their appeal on the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision to deny a height increase for a new sanctuary. The added time, the reader noted, allows OVCN time to strengthen their case. The reader pointed out that Paul Oland of Paradigm Land Design, working for OVCN, submitted two requests for information to the town just days later. Both requests seek information on prior building height approvals for similar facilities. The reader questioned why such information was not requested long ago.

March brings outdoor fun and family activities to Oro Valley 

The Oro Valley Parks & Recreation newsletter highlights an exciting lineup of March events for residents of all ages. Outdoor enthusiasts can join the Oro Valley Hiking Series on March 1 at Dead Horse Canyon, offering a guided trek through an “unmapped” trail. Music lovers can enjoy a Friday Night Concert at Steam Pump Ranch on March 7, featuring a live performance by the Vindaloo Band. Families can look forward to Second Saturday at Steam Pump Ranch on March 8, complete with historical tours, live music, and a farmers’ market. Later in the month, Movie at the Ranch on March 15 will screen Inside Out 2 under the stars, while Family Camping at the Ranch on March 29-30 provides an opportunity to experience an overnight campout, complete with s’mores and a pancake breakfast. With spring break camps and fitness programs also on the schedule, March is shaping up to be an active and engaging month in Oro Valley.

Text message scam targeting drivers

The February 2025 CrimeFighter Newsletter highlights a new text message scam targeting drivers by falsely claiming they owe unpaid toll road fees. Scammers send messages pretending to be from FasTrak, an electronic toll collection system, and include a link to a fake payment website. The fraudulent messages often create urgency by threatening penalties for non-payment, tricking recipients into providing sensitive financial information. The newsletter warns that a key red flag is the sender’s phone number, which typically originates from the Philippines (+63 country code). FasTrak officials emphasize that they never send text messages demanding payment from non-account holders. Residents are advised to avoid clicking on any links and instead verify toll charges directly through the official FasTrak website.

Ashley Furniture owner Sam levitz faces lawsuit over unpaid rent and customer grievances

In December 2024, the landlords of the Sam Levitz Furniture owned Ashley Furniture, formerly located in the Oro Valley Marketplace, filed a lawsuit in December alleging that the company breached its lease by closing its Oro Valley Ashley Furniture store without notice and failing to pay nearly $60,000 in monthly rent. The lease was intended to run through June 2036. Concurrently, customers have reported unresolved issues, including undelivered furniture and unaddressed warranty claims, with some expressing frustration over the company’s lack of communication since its closure. (Source 1). 

(Source 2)

Here's why we always question the reliability of national rankings about Oro Valley

We are always wary of data provided by national companies ranking Oro Valley in any survey. These rankings are often promotional articles with little data reliability. One example is moveBuddha’s recent ranking of Oro Valley’s moving trends, which reported only 49 moves into the town and a move-in to move-out ratio of 0.49 in 2024. If moveBuddha’s data were the only source considered, this ratio would suggest that more people are leaving Oro Valley than moving in, implying a declining population. This, of course, is not the case, as Oro Valley’s population is growing. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Oro Valley’s population increased from 47,070 in 2020 to an estimated 48,226 in 2022, indicating an average annual growth rate of approximately 0.6%. This suggests a net increase of about 1,156 residents over two years, or roughly 578 people per year. This figure represents net population growth, accounting for both people moving in and out of Oro Valley, as well as natural changes such as births and deaths.

More On Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s Building Height Variance Hearing Continuation

April 2 is new hearing date
The Oro Valley Town Council voted unanimously to continue the hearing on the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s (OVCN) height variance request for six weeks, moving it to April 2. The hearing is an appeal of an OVCN request to have a 40 height limit on a planned new sanctuary.  (Read this article to learn more about what is at stake)

The continuance decision followed a request from John Gillespie, an attorney with the Rose Law Group, who was recently retained by the church. Mayor Joe Winfield explained that he received the request via email on the day prior and acknowledged it promptly. The council’s decision allows OVCN’s new legal representation time to familiarize themselves with the case and prepare their arguments.

OVCN legal representative emphasizes collaboration and understanding
During the meeting, Gillespie emphasized that the Rose Law Group specializes in land-use cases and is committed to working with both the town and local residents to find a well-informed resolution. He is also stated that "We were just engaged this past week. We focused on land-use issues. We're not a litigation firm."

Gillespie initially requested a 30-day continuance, but Mayor Winfield proposed extending the delay to six weeks to ensure full council participation. The revised timeline avoids a conflict with the March 19 meeting, which falls during the town’s spring break and could result in some council members being absent. The motion for the six-week continuance was seconded by Councilmember Greene and passed without opposition.

Council urges church to engage with neighbors in preparing for April 2 hearing
Councilmember Robb took the opportunity to stress the importance of community engagement during the extended review period. She specifically asked that the church and its representatives consult with nearby residents and other interested parties, rather than limiting discussions to town officials. Gillespie agreed, stating, "The church understands that they need to be a development partner and that any use of their land requires collaboration with the town and neighbors.” He added that his firm’s goal is to "help facilitate a good, informed outcome that benefits all parties involved.”

Winfield reinforces commitment to due process
Mayor Winfield reiterated that granting the continuance does not indicate a predetermined outcome. He explained that while the Planning and Zoning Commission previously denied the height variance request for a 40-foot structure, it is essential that the town follows a fair and transparent process. "By granting this continuance, we remove any potential concerns about the applicant’s right to due process, which strengthens the legitimacy of whatever decision we ultimately make,”  Winfield said. He also assured residents that the council will weigh the request carefully, balancing property rights with neighborhood concerns.

Residents encouraged to return for April 2 hearing
The decision to continue the hearing disappointed a room full of those who had attended the meeting expecting a final decision. Many were prepared to address council during the hearing. However, Mayor Winfield stated that moving forward with discussions without knowing the church’s revised position would not be productive. He asked for patience from both supporters and opponents, encouraging them to return on April 2 when the town will conduct a full review of the request.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

OVCN building height hearing continued
The Town Council hearing room was packed with those for and against the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s (OVCN) request to build a 40-foot sanctuary. As we reported yesterday, many attendees were likely disappointed to learn that the hearing was continued until April 2. The continuation was requested by John Gillespie of Rose Law Group, who is now representing OVCN. This marks yet another delay in the church’s plans for the property.

Rancho Vistoso residents need vote on street parking enforcement
A new Arizona law may limit the Vistoso Community Association’s ability to enforce street parking rules, but a community-wide vote could allow enforcement to continue. If the association loses this authority, it could lead to safety concerns such as blocked views for drivers and pedestrians, restricted access for emergency vehicles, and reduced property values due to unsightly parked vehicles. Residents are urged to participate in the upcoming vote before the annual meeting on March 27, 2025, to help maintain the community’s safety and aesthetics. (Source: VCA Newsletter – January 2025)

Tucson Bicycle Classic returns to Oro Valley Sunday—expect traffic delays
The Tucson Bicycle Classic returns to Oro Valley on Sunday, bringing more than 600 professional cyclists to Naranja Park for the final stage of the three-day race. The Oro Valley Circuit Race, featuring a new 2.8-mile course and a challenging uphill finish on Musette Drive, is expected to generate over $180,000 in economic impact. Spectators can enjoy prime viewing spots inside Naranja Park, with food trucks and vendors available.

To ensure safety, road closures and traffic restrictions will be in place from 3 a.m. to 7 p.m. on race day. Naranja Drive (between Monterra Vista Dr. and Musette Rd.) will be closed, along with several surrounding roads. Motorists should expect delays and plan alternate routes. Free spectator parking will be available at the Oro Valley Public Library and Town Hall. For a full list of closures and detours, visit [event website].

Oro Valley’s latest project updates
Ongoing projects include accessibility enhancements at the Community & Recreation Center, safety improvements near Leman Academy, and drainage upgrades at Naranja Park. The Town is also advancing efforts to enhance public spaces, with upcoming Resident Working Groups set to help shape Oro Valley’s next 10-year plan. These projects aim to improve infrastructure, safety, and community engagement. (Source: Oro Valley Vista)

- - -

Oro Valley Town Council to Hear OVCN Appeal

Oro Valley town council to decide on OVCN appeal
The Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's January decision denying the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) permission to build a new sanctuary with a height of 40 feet. The current allowable height on the property is 24 feet, but the town has the authority to grant a higher limit.

OVCN claims unfair standards and disregard for evidence
OVCN is appealing the decision, arguing that it is unjust and unfair. They claim the Commission disregarded substantial evidence supporting their proposal, applied inconsistent standards, and failed to consider the broader community benefits. As an example, they argue that the Commission unfairly scrutinized the volume of activities and attendance at their facility compared to similar projects.

Town staff’s response: Height request tied to safety and seating capacity
Town staff responded to some of these assertions. In their meeting notice to the council, they state that the proposed sanctuary height increase is directly tied to accommodating auditorium-style seating for over 1,500 people. They cite International Building Code requirements, which mandate specific roof heights for safety and sightlines. Staff also note that increased seating capacity affects parking and traffic considerations.

Significant Community opposition
Community members oppose the height request. In just one week, more than 600 residents have signed a petition urging the town to deny the appeal.

Three resolution options...but there could be more
Town staff has proposed three resolution options for the council’s consideration:

• Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of OVCN’s height increase request.
• Overrule the denial with conditions, allowing a maximum height of 29 feet plus an additional 5 feet for parapet screening, but only in areas necessary to fully screen mechanical equipment, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
• Overrule the denial and fully approve the height increase request, subject to conditions outlined in the staff report, including landscape buffers and positioning requirements to minimize visual impact.

Uncertainty over the 29-foot option
The inclusion of the 29-foot option is unclear, as OVCN withdrew it from consideration. Initially, OVCN proposed a 29-foot height, assuming part of the sanctuary would be built underground, but they rescinded this request a week later. It is unknown whether the council will discuss this or other height options at tonight’s meeting. The council has the authority to modify these options or propose its own. For example, they may consider continuing the item for further discussion or negotiation.

Next steps for OVCN
If the council does not approve the 40-foot height, OVCN has two alternatives. They can either build the sanctuary within the existing 24-foot height limit or pursue legal action, potentially including a federal court challenge, if they believe their rights under federal law, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA-See Below), have been violated. 

Stay tuned for updates on this decision.

- - -
RLUIPA protects religious institutions from discriminatory land use regulations by requiring governments to apply the same standards as they do for non-religious entities and to justify any substantial burden with a compelling interest pursued in the least restrictive way. Protecting the character and livability of a neighborhood, particularly regarding noise, traffic, public safety, or environmental impact, is a compelling government interest, as long as the government can demonstrate that the restriction is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest and is applied in a non-discriminatory manner.

Guest View-David Rishor: The "Oro Valley Motor Speedway"

Previously we wrote about the very unsafe Buena Vista & Concordia intersection. With 30 accidents in the last 10 years and increasing traffic from CDO High School and an upcoming OVCN expansion, this intersection poses unique challenges. 

What we did not relate at that time were some other serious traffic issues caused by this hard to navigate intersection. Resident David Rishor told us about some collateral damage caused by that mess.

- - -

"What was missing from discussions about traffic issues [at Concordia and Buena Vista] is the Overlook Drive shortcut—or as we neighbors call it, the Oro Valley Motor Speedway.

This route is often overlooked.. but not by the traffic heading to or from the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene and CDO High School. Why? It’s simple. We all know about the congestion and dangerous conditions at W. Calle Concordia and N. Buena Vista. Since this intersection is a nightmare, what do drivers do? They cut south on Overlook Drive, turn west on Spring Valley Drive, and then jump onto southbound Buena Vista—TA-DA! An easy, breezy way to bypass the congestion.

And bypass it they do! Day after day, weekend after weekend, we witness cars flying through this 25 mph residential area at criminal-level speeds. It’s terrifying. You should see it—OMG! Why isn’t Oro Valley P.D. taking advantage of this? They’re never around. Why not?

The solution? Simple.

Speed humps. Not speed bumps that force drivers to crawl at 5 mph, but properly designed humps that are smooth at 25 mph yet unforgiving to speeders. Go too fast? BAM—you’ll feel it!

Something must be done. This issue is serious, and it needs to stay part of the traffic conversation!"

- - -

David...we definitely agree.

Bits and Pieces

OVCN appeal of new sanctuary building height be heard on February 19

The Oro Valley Town Council will hold a public hearing on February 19 to review an appeal from the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN).  OVCN  is appealing the Planning and Zoning Commission’s January 14 decision to deny its request for a sanctuary building taller than what the town has previously permitted. OVCN must go through this appeal process, facing possible denial again, before considering other options.  Wednesday, the town council met in "closed door" session to obtain legal advice on this matter.

Oppose the OVCN expansion? Here’s how to take action!
Petitions opposing the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) expansion are available for signing at the Oro Valley Library from 10 AM to 1 PM daily (except Sunday) until Friday, February 14 (Valentine’s Day).  Want a petition? Call (520) 275-3726 to request one.

Former Oro Valley Town Manager Caton now Scottsdale's interim city manager

Greg Caton, who previously served as Oro Valley’s town manager from 2012 to 2016 and as interim town manager the year prior, has been appointed as the interim city manager for Scottsdale. Caton, who joined Scottsdale last year, brings years of municipal leadership experience to the role. His tenure in Oro Valley was marked by key developments and policy initiatives, and now he steps into this leadership position as Scottsdale navigates its ongoing projects and community priorities. (Partial Source)

Rockin’ 4 Heroes Supports Firefighters – Please Join Us! 

Rockin’ 4 Heroes is proud to be one of the sponsors for the 2025 Jose Samaniego Memorial Archery Shoot and BBQ Challenge, taking place at Naranja Park on March 1st. We are excited to participate in this annual event as it enters its seventh year! This free event promises a fantastic day for kids and local residents—no matter where you live! The event runs from 10 AM to 4 PM. 

Enjoy live music, games, prizes, food, and beverages! Bring the kids and come out to support this event, hosted by the North Tucson Firefighters Association - Local 3832. Fees are required to participate in the archery shoot and to access the BBQ feast. All proceeds will benefit the North Tucson Firefighters Charities, with a portion of the fees being tax-deductible. 

Rockin’ 4 Heroes hopes to see many of our supporters and followers at our tent—we love connecting with you throughout the year! Let’s show huge support for our first responders!

Traffic Safety Concerns at the Buena Vista and Concordia Intersection

Traffic control challenges ahead
The intersection of Buena Vista and Concordia presents unique traffic safety challenges. The current traffic control setup includes stop signs only on the north-south road, Buena Vista, while the east-west road, Concordia, has no traffic control measures. This disparity can create confusion among drivers, particularly those unfamiliar with the intersection, leading to an increased risk of accidents. Data from 2014 to 2024 shows a total of 30 accidents at this intersection.

High School traffic causes many incidents
One of the significant factors contributing to traffic congestion at this intersection is the presence of CDO High School. During weekdays, traffic volumes peak in the mornings and early afternoons as students, parents, and staff commute to and from the school. In fact, 60% of recorded accidents in the past ten years occurred during school hours and days, highlighting the impact of increased traffic during these periods. The increased volume of vehicles, combined with the absence of a traffic signal, can lead to congestion and higher chances of collisions.

Intersection layout complicates safe crossing
Another challenge stems from the unique layout of the intersection [panel right]. Drivers crossing from one section of Buena Vista to the other cannot proceed in a straight line; they must first turn left and then right to continue across. This complex maneuver introduces additional opportunities for driver error, potentially contributing to the high number of angle (front-to-side) collisions reported at this location. Of the total collisions recorded, 70% were angle collisions, further demonstrating the difficulties posed by the intersection's layout.

Most common accident cause is "Failure To Yield"
Accident data indicates that the most common cause of collisions at this intersection is "Failure to Yield Right of Way." This issue is particularly prevalent among vehicles traveling north or south on Buena Vista, which are required to stop at the intersection. In contrast, east-west traffic on Concordia, which does not have to stop, often proceeds at higher speeds, increasing the likelihood of accidents. Of the accidents caused by failure to yield, 81% involved north or southbound traffic.

Speeding and driver misjudgment also play a role
Speeding and misjudgments are additional contributing factors. Several accidents have been attributed to drivers traveling too fast for conditions, particularly during peak hours. The absence of dedicated turning lanes or clear signage further complicates navigation, making it crucial for drivers to remain vigilant.

Better traffic control needed now...

To improve safety at this intersection, potential solutions could include enhanced signage, additional traffic control measures such as flashing lights, or even a reconfiguration of the crossing pattern to allow for smoother transitions between Buena Vista's sections. Increased enforcement during high-traffic times may also help mitigate risks and promote safer driving behaviors. 

 ...Needed even more if OVCN expands

While 30 accidents over ten years might not be considered excessively high, it does suggest room for improvement in traffic safety. The unique intersection layout, school-related traffic, and the significant increase in Sunday morning and Wednesday night traffic as a result of the pending massive expansion of the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene contribute to these incidents and could potentially add to future risks. Measures such as improved signage, traffic calming, or re-evaluating intersection control seem like viable actions the town should take to enhance safety and reduce accident occurrences.

- - -

Statistics for the article were from accident data provided by the Town of Oro Valley.

Is Construction of A New OVCN Sanctuary Inevitable? Maybe Yes. Maybe No.

Resident objections to OVCN expansion reflect common development concerns, but are they enough to halt the project?

The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) has the zoning rights to expand its property, including building a larger sanctuary. Despite this legal entitlement, the proposed expansion has faced significant opposition from nearby residents. 

These objections, while passionate and numerous, generally align with arguments that have been used in other communities to challenge developments. Historically, some of these arguments have successfully delayed or stopped projects, while others have been less effective.

Common, successful arguments against a development
Environmental Concerns
One of the most effective arguments against development projects centers on environmental impact. If a project threatens local ecosystems, contributes to erosion or flooding, or harms protected species, it can face significant legal challenges. In the case of the OVCN expansion, concerns about increased stormwater runoff or the removal of natural vegetation could be raised if supported by environmental studies.
Traffic and Infrastructure Impact
Increased traffic congestion and strain on infrastructure are frequently cited concerns that have successfully delayed or altered development projects. Residents near OVCN have expressed worries that a larger sanctuary will draw more attendees, worsening traffic on local roads and potentially overwhelming parking capacity. If traffic studies substantiate these concerns, they could form a solid basis for pushing for project modifications.
Noncompliance with Comprehensive or General Plans
If the OVCN expansion conflicts with Oro Valley's broader land-use or comprehensive planning goals, this could serve as a legal basis for objection. However, since the church's expansion is permitted under current zoning, this argument may not apply unless specific planning inconsistencies are identified.
Public Safety Concerns
Concerns that increased traffic could hamper emergency vehicle access or create safety hazards for pedestrians, especially in residential neighborhoods, can be compelling. Some of the residents in the area do require medical assistance from time to time. That assistance could be required at any time. Yes. Even during the hours when the church is in operation. Demonstrating that the expansion would significantly compromise public safety in general or of persons living in the area of could pressure the town to impose conditions or seek modifications.

Less successful arguments
Aesthetic and Community Character Concerns
Objections that the new sanctuary would clash with the neighborhood's appearance or disrupt the community's character are common but rarely successful unless the area has strict design guidelines or historic preservation rules. Since the OVCN property is already developed as a church, this argument holds limited weight.
General Community Opposition
While community opposition can influence decision-makers, it is typically not enough on its own to block a project. Unless opposition is paired with specific legal or regulatory violations,  such as environmental violations, civil rights violations, or ethics violations, general dissatisfaction carries limited legal power.
Property Value Impact
Claims that a project will lower nearby property values are difficult to prove and are generally not sufficient grounds for denial. Courts and zoning boards rarely prioritize speculative economic impacts over property owners' rights.
Noise and Light Pollution
Concerns about potential increases in noise or light from larger gatherings or nighttime events are valid but often addressed through mitigation measures rather than outright denial. Noise ordinances and lighting regulations usually govern these issues.

Will resident objections be enough?
While Oro Valley residents have raised numerous objections to the OVCN expansion, the success of these efforts depends on the nature of the concerns and how well they align with legal or regulatory standards. Arguments based on environmental impact, traffic congestion, and public safety have historically been more effective in slowing or altering projects. In contrast, aesthetic concerns and general opposition without legal grounding tend to carry less weight.

For residents hoping to influence the outcome, focusing on well-documented, legally grounded concerns seems to be the most effective strategy moving forward.

- - -

Is The OVCN New Sanctuary Height Request Matter Really Dead? Do Their Arguments "Hold Water?

Planning and Zoning Commission denied OVCN height request
Last week, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) to allow the height of a new sanctuary to be greater than currently in place. 

However, OVCN has the right to appeal

We suspect that OVCN will appeal this decision to the Oro Valley Town Council.  That appeal must be requested by early February. Prior to making their decision, OVCN attorney Jerry Steele presented their legal basis for commission why the request should be granted.  We expect to hear the same arguments when the appeal is heard. 

Prior approval supports new height request
The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) representative began by highlighting the Planning and Zoning Commission’s previous approval of a 42-foot roof for a church facility. The current request seeks approval for a 40-foot roof—two feet shorter than what was previously approved and five feet below the 45-foot limit permitted by code. The representative argued that this prior decision sets a clear precedent, making it reasonable for the church to believe their new request would be accepted.

However, under questioning of town council by a commission member it was revealed that "...from a regulatory standpoint, you [the commission] denied the 42 feet and recommended ... that it go forward to council. So this group never approved 42 feet. It might've been on the plan, but it wasn't approved by you."

Concerns about sightline impact lack evidence
Addressing community concerns about obstructed views, the church representative noted that neither residents nor town staff have provided substantial evidence showing significant sightline interference. Town staff reported any interference as minimal. The church also presented photographic "evidence" supporting the claim that the building would be barely visible from neighboring areas, except from its entrance side. The representative emphasized that the proposed structure would sit between the existing 29-foot sanctuary and a nearby 60-foot high school building, suggesting the design fits the area's existing landscape.

A legal "standard" should be used
The church questioned the basis on which the commission would decide—whether on legal standards or public sentiment. The representative pointed out that the commission has granted similar height approvals for other churches and schools, ranging from 36 to 45 feet. Denying OVCN’s request, despite these precedents, could violate the church's right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment. This argument positioned the decision as a matter of consistent legal application rather than community opposition.

Federal law protects religious property use
The representative cited the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prevents government bodies from imposing substantial burdens on religious institutions without a compelling governmental interest. Rejecting the 40-foot roof would force the church to redesign the building, resulting in an estimated additional cost of $6–10 million. This financial impact was presented as a substantial burden, and the representative argued that no compelling governmental interest—such as public safety—justifies such an imposition. Aesthetic concerns, they stressed, do not meet the legal threshold for denying the request.

Prior approvals in other situations should apply here
In conclusion, OVCN urged the commission to honor its prior approval, acknowledge the absence of significant sightline impacts, and recognize the church's legal rights. The representative called for the commission to approve the 40-foot roof height and allow the project to proceed to the next phase of review. The church expressed appreciation for the commission's consideration and awaited its decision.

What could happen next

LOVE believes that OVCN will exercise its right to appeal the decision to the Town Council. It if does not do so, it will have no legal recourse to further pursue this. If the Council affirms the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision, OVCN can then seek remedy through litigation, which could delay the project for a long time, or it could drop the matter and design the facility within the current 29-foot height limit.

Perhaps OVCN will choose to do just that. After all, it does have the deeded right to do so.

But is that right absolute? Read more tomorrow.

- - - 

Bits and Pieces

Former council member supports OVCN height request 

Former Oro Valley Council Member Steve Solomon spoke in support of the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s (OVCN) request to increase the height of its new sanctuary during a Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on Tuesday. Solomon emphasized OVCN’s positive impact on the community, highlighting its role in hosting town events and charitable initiatives. He referenced the annual Feed My Starving Children event, where “7,000 local residents came to OVCN to volunteer to package over a million packets of meals for starving children.” Solomon urged decision-makers to focus on facts rather than emotions, stating that the building height request aligns with zoning laws and precedents, adding that “disapproval of this request would require compelling facts solely related to the height.” Solomon, a congregant of the church, was the last audience speaker. Shortly thereafter, the commission unanimously denied the request.

One day, BofA building may be able to display colors on its logo… will Target be next? 

Tuesday, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended allowing Bank of America to follow the town’s sign code (Chapter 28) instead of the more restrictive Rooney Ranch Sign Code, which was established in 1998. The final decision now rests with the Town Council when it takes up this matter at next Wednesday's meeting. If approved by the council, the bank will be able to display its official logo colors instead of the current variation. This raises the question—will Target make a similar request? Years ago, Target was denied permission to use its signature red color on the trademark balls at the store entrance.

UPDATE: The town council unanimously approved the Bank of America request. This approval applies to that property only. Other businesses will have to apply for such change on their own if they wish.

Rockin' 4 Heroes 2025 date

The 2025 Rockin’ 4 Heroes Annual Concert will be held during Veterans Day Weekend in Oro Valley. Bands and other concert-related information will be forthcoming. "For now, save this weekend for us and consult our website or Facebook event page. Stay tuned to LOVE, our website and our various social media platforms for updates! We can’t wait to see you again!" (Source: Rockin' 4 Heroes email)

Big bridge repair grant is still in limbo 

Grants are an important source of revenue for the town. We last reported in October that Oro Valley was pursuing significant funding for infrastructure repairs. Not much has changed since then. In his January executive report to the council, the Town Manager noted that the largest of these grants is “…in a waiting period for the Town of Oro Valley Bridge Repair Project.” This grant totals $7 million. Town Manager Wilkins added, “The good news is that our project remains in a strong position for a final Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations bill. However, it is likely we will not have any additional information to share until mid-March.” (Source: Town Manager Executive Report To Council, January 2025)

The grant is sponsored by Congressman Ciscomani, who, alongside Mayor Winfield, publicly celebrated the project’s inclusion in the bill. However, it remains uncertain whether the funding will survive the final approval process. If it doesn’t, the town will need to find another grant source or fund the project itself—a financial burden that Wilkins described as a “big nut to crack.” 

State seems to be a very poor source of economic development leads

In December, the town received one economic development opportunity from the state. According to Town Manager Wilkins:  “Oro Valley was included in state-wide searches by one prospective business in December 2024. The Town was unable to respond as the project was zoned heavy industrial and required rail service.” (Source: Town Manager Executive Report To Council, January 2025). We cannot recall the town receiving any economic development lead from the state in the past two years which was even close to being something suitable for the community. 

- - - 

UPDATE: Proposal Denied-OVCN Height Request To Be Heard Tonight; Strong Community Objections Expected

The past is prologue

If last week’s Call to Audience portion of the Oro Valley Town Council meeting is any indication, strong objections are expected tonight regarding the request for a height increase for a planned sanctuary at the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene.

Nine residents spoke in opposition to the proposal. Their objections focused on several key issues, including the project’s incompatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhood, increased traffic and noise, potential declines in property values, and OVCN’s use of a procedural loophole to avoid full project disclosure and review.

Residents have voiced overwhelming concern

The overwhelming concern is that what was once a small, nice neighborhood church has become a nightmare for the community because it is simply too big for the area. Now, the church wants to get even bigger and believes it is entitled to do so. Rather than moving forward with a design to which it is currently entitled, the church has decided it needs the sanctuary to be taller than what currently exists. This new height must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. That is the focus of tonight’s meeting.

The "ask" us a bridge too far

What is interesting about this is that the zoning for the property allows for greater height if that height is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In other words, this is not a request for rezoning or a request for a General Plan amendment. This is simply, as town staff has often put it, an “ask.” We have never seen a situation like this as we approach our 18th year of publishing LOVE. The commission is under no obligation to approve this “ask.” In fact, they can simply deny it or choose not to vote on it, leaving the matter to be settled by the Town Council if OVCN decides to appeal the decision.

Will the siege ever end?

This “ask” is yet another attempt by OVCN to overwhelm the neighborhood. They’ve been pursuing growth for four years now, and we suspect they will continue their relentless efforts regardless of tonight's outcome. Their four year siege demonstrates that they don’t care about the impact on the neighborhood or their neighbors; they only care about getting what they want. This makes it very difficult for the neighbors. We know many of them—they are peaceful and simply want to be left alone to enjoy their lovely homes. After all, the area is unique; it is the original Oro Valley.

We will post an update on what happens at the meeting here. Sign up for our Facebook page so you can get a notice of this an all other updates.

- - -

The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanmously (7-0) to deny the "ask" for the height increases on the basis that the proposal is incompatible with the area in accordance with the Your Voice, Our Future General Plan design standard.

It's a Wrap! Top Stories of 2024

Top five stories of 2024

2024 was a busy year in Oro Valley. Here us out cut at the top five stories. 

1. Celebrating 50 years of community and growth
The Town of Oro Valley commemorated its 50th anniversary throughout 2024 with a series of events that highlighted the community’s history and spirit. The celebrations included a vibrant parade on April 6, featuring over 90 participants from local schools, community groups, and businesses, along with a spectacular fireworks display on April 13 at James D. Kriegh Park. Additionally, on April 27, the town hosted the “50 Trees for 50 Years” community tree planting event, where residents gathered to plant 50 trees across four locations, enhancing the town’s green spaces. The Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce also launched the “50 Businesses for 50 Years” Shop OV campaign, highlighting 50 local businesses throughout the year to encourage community support and economic growth.

2. Robb and Murphy elected to council
In the 2024 Oro Valley Town Council election, two new council members were elected by a vast majority of votes, reflecting strong community support. Elizabeth Robb, a local business owner, and Mary Murphy, a longtime resident and community advocate, bring fresh perspectives to the council. Their addition is expected to influence upcoming decisions on key community issues, including development projects, public services, and fiscal policies. Residents anticipate that the new council members will prioritize transparency and community engagement, ensuring that the voices of Oro Valley citizens are well-represented in the town’s governance.

3. The OVCN’s onslaught on Oro Valley’s historic neighborhood took a new turn
The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) put its plan to build a massive sports complex on hold, at least for the moment. However, that plan is not dead; it’s simply on hiatus. Instead, they are now pursuing the addition of new facilities to their campus, substantially increasing their footprint. The latest effort is to ask permission for buildings of greater height than currently exists. As we wrote yesterday, it’s a continuing cycle of misery for the residents. This saga will continue into 2025.

4. Another year of nothing for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve
The Town Council did lots of talking about the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve. There was much discussion about plans to do something. The council even agreed to “do something” only to learn that one of those plans — repurposing the abandoned pond into a “desert garden” — was an unattractive alternative. Residents noticed this, and the council temporarily paused the approved plan to take another look at the water feature instead of a desert garden. More on this in 2025. In the meantime, the preserve looks like an abandoned golf course.

5. "OVPathForward" moves forward big time
The town made progress this year in creating its 2026 General Plan, called “OV Path Forward.” A draft vision and guiding principles were developed with the input of thousands of residents. The next step is to flesh out the details around these principles. Working groups will tackle this in 2025.

Honorable mention

There were some other notable happenings this year:

• The fourth annual Rockin’4Heroes concert was a huge success.
• The town implemented an 8.3% increase in water rates, while continuing to use thousands of gallons of water on recreation facilities, earning the LOVE Water Waster Award for the fourth time.
• The town council adopted a $151.2 million budget.
• Oro Valley celebrated the opening of Naranja Park.
• The Arizona Heroes Memorial at the park was dedicated.
• The town ended its contract with Visit Tucson and took over its own destination marketing program.
• The Town Council rejected the tiny homes project in Rancho Vistoso.

And on a sad note
Rick Messina, a well-liked groundskeeper at the Pusch Ridge Golf Course, tragically died from a bee attack in July. Friends of Pusch Ridge Golf raised almost $10,000 to help Rick’s parents.

It was indeed a busy year in Oro Valley.

We suspect that 2025 will be just as busy.

Happy holidays to all.
- - -