OVCN’s Campus Expansion Efforts Marked By Delays and Strategy Shifts

Tonite’s council meeting may bring another delay
Tonite, the Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to grant the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene yet another postponement. This one is a delay of a possible council decision to overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission's recent denial of a height request for a new building. Postponements are the hallmark of OVCN. They seem to request one every time things are not going well for them.

Four years of delay and suspense
That is the history based on our review of their efforts to enlarge their current location over the past four years. The Town has granted a number of postponements to give OVCN more time to pursue its objective to somehow and in some way enlarge its facility—and at the same time extend the suspense for the many residents who oppose their efforts.

Initial proposal aimed to build a full sports complex
In early 2022, OVCN submitted a rezoning request to transform its campus with the addition of a sports complex. The initial plan included a full-sized football/soccer field and other athletic facilities. The proposal quickly drew opposition from nearby residents, who cited traffic, lighting, noise, and loss of neighborhood character as major concerns. Fourteen neighbors submitted a formal opposition letter to the Town on March 1, 2022.

First postponement: no Planning & Zoning hearing in 2022
Despite these concerns, the application moved forward. A Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) hearing was originally expected in 2022, but OVCN requested a delay. Town staff announced that the hearing would not occur before January 2023. This marked the first of multiple postponements that would stretch the process out for years.

Resident frustrations grew as proposal remained active
In October 2022, the Town facilitated a meeting between OVCN and affected neighbors. Residents reiterated their opposition to any version of the project. They pointed out that OVCN had previously removed trees and gates that were part of its original development agreement—actions that contributed to distrust. Some residents also noted that town staff appeared to be working with OVCN to “find a compromise,” even contacting neighbors directly after the meeting to negotiate support. These efforts were unsuccessful.

Second postponement: OVCN delays again in 2023
By early 2023, OVCN had not withdrawn the rezoning application but again postponed its progress. Town staff indicated in February 2023 that OVCN had requested more time. The item was not scheduled for the March or April agendas. Over the next few months, the proposal remained on hold, with no public movement.

Third postponement: still no hearing by late 2023
As of late 2023, the application remained pending with no scheduled PZC hearing. In October, Town staff again confirmed that the delay was at OVCN’s request. Residents expressed frustration with the lack of transparency, noting that the church continued to revise its plans behind closed doors. The rezoning request still had not been withdrawn. It is today laying nascent in the queue.

New proposal avoids rezoning, raises new concerns
In 2024, OVCN changed its approach. Rather than pursuing rezoning for a sports complex, it introduced a plan to build a 40-foot-tall sanctuary, a student center, a maintenance building, and over 800 paved parking spaces. These were all permitted under existing zoning, with the exception of the sanctuary height, which would require a variance. Town staff confirmed the height request would be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment. Meanwhile, the original rezoning request stayed “on hold.”

Neighbors fear sports complex is still the goal
Residents questioned whether the sanctuary might eventually become an indoor sports facility—especially since the original request included such a structure. Concerns also included additional traffic, parking congestion, and the size of the project. In August 2024, neighbors attended a meeting with OVCN but left disappointed. The church presented no specific site plan and asked for general feedback, saying final decisions had not been made.

Questionable outreach efforts and neighbor response
Following that August 2024 meeting, OVCN sent a form letter to neighbors suggesting it had not heard back from them—despite their attendance at the meeting. Residents saw this as a misleading outreach effort. Longtime neighbor Tricia Tozier stated publicly that she felt OVCN had no real intention of listening. The meeting did little to reduce neighborhood opposition.

Another postponement
The Planning and Zoning Commission rejected the OVCN request for a height variance in January. OVCN appealed that decision to the Town Council. When the hearing came up in late January, OVCN asked for yet another postponement—this time because they had hired new legal counsel. The hearing was rescheduled for tonight.

And a request for yet another postponement to be heard tonight
Then, several weeks ago, OVCN asked for a postponement of this hearing. It doesn’t matter why. We have reported why. It doesn’t matter why they want it. It matters that they want it. Our surmise is that they want more time to work the system, to work the neighbors, and to build a legal basis for a possible future legal challenge.

Tonight the council can say "No"

- - -

Want to learn more? Read our years long coverage.

OVCN Shenanigans Go On and On and On...

The OVCN saga takes on a new twist

Wednesday, we discussed the long history of the OVCN sports expansion zoning change request extravaganza. The request exemplifies how a zoning change request can take on a life of its own. Essentially, the church has been “threatening” to uproot the lives of their neighbors by bringing more traffic, more noise, and more disruption to Oro Valley’s original neighborhood.

Seek a 40' high sanctuary and more

The saga of OVCN’s ongoing impact on the neighborhood continues with a new plan. This plan includes a student center, a sanctuary, a maintenance building, and more than 800 paved parking spaces. Town staff believes these are all permitted uses. The only request is for a height variance for a 40’ building, which can be approved, according to town staff, solely by the Planning and Zoning Commission.  We suspect that decision would be subject to council appeal.  You can watch a video of the latest plan here and read the full two-year history of the OVCN situation here.

Original zoning change request is still "in the works"... so is there more than "meets the eye"?

Notably, the latest plan does not replace the existing zoning change request. That request is currently on hold at OVCN’s request. We wonder: Is this latest plan for a sanctuary with a 40 foot high roof line really just a "stepping stone" for later conversion to an indoor sports facility? Or will it be used as such immediately? 

Residents in the area are not happy with this proposal

Residents will get a chance to learn more and opine at a town led neighborhood meeting on September 26. We suspect they will be against the project. Resident Trish Tozier went to a briefing held by OVCN on the latest proposal. It was brief. She reported on this and voiced her opposition in an August council meeting. Here is what she said.

- - -

25-Year Resident Shares Concerns Over OVCN Expansion

"Mayor Winfield, Vice Mayor Barrett, Council, and Staff, my name is Tricia Tozier. I am a 25-year resident of Oro Valley.

Initial Neighborhood Opposition Since 2022
Let me give you a couple of bullet points about why this OVCN building issue is problematic.  On March 1st, 2022, 14 neighbors presented a letter, as required by the town, outlining our concerns about the proposed rezone. Now, in July 2024, OVCN finally decided it was time to send a letter to these same people, which they did.

Recent Meeting Lacked Substance and Specific Plans
On August 1st, five neighbors, including myself, representing the Concordia Buena Vista group, attended a meeting. The presentation was given by Craig Coulter. Drawings and full-color pictures of their new proposal were shown. However, there were no specifics or definitive plans presented, except that they mentioned a height variance would be needed, and they would ask for the neighbors’ input on landscaping. Woo-hoo. He then asked for input.

Meeting Offered No Real Progress; Concerns Remain Unaddressed
Well, Ed Clary, who was also there, said, "Our concerns remain the same as they have for the last four and a half years. There's nothing to talk about." I must say, it was an uncomfortable meeting, and it adjourned.  There appeared to be no real purpose for the meeting other than perhaps to make OVCN look good. As a result, there was no way to assess the new proposal, aside from the pretty pictures. A few weeks later, OVCN sent a second letter to these same neighbors. It was the same form letter, except this time it included the phrase, “Since you did not respond.”

Lack of Genuine Community Engagement
Really? I was there. Is this what OVCN considers engagement with the community? Even the names were misspelled. Besides Craig Coulter, Gene Hayward, an administrator, and another person named David Williamson were present.

Builder’s Comments Highlight OVCN’s Approach
Williamson described himself as a builder and said he was only there to answer any questions about construction. Since there were no plans, there were no questions for him. But he did add at the end of the meeting that "something will be built there." We said, "Thank you." I’m not sure if it was a threat or a promise.

As an aside, Mr. Williamson owns Fairfield Homes and is the builder of both Mr. Coulter's and Mr. Collins' homes. OVCN describes this as "reaching out." After the meeting and the second letter, the Concordia Buena Vista group can only interpret this whole charade as OVCN saying they will do what they propose when they want."
- - -

Town Staff Seeks Common Ground On OVCN Sports Complex… Residents Say “No!”

Town staff seeks to forge compromise

The Town of Oro Valley Planning and Zoning staff is trying to forge a compromise on the OVCN request to build a sports complex. The proposal is unanimously opposed by the residents who will be impacted by it.

According to the residents, there is no compromise.  The sports complex will forever change the character of the neighborhood. It will ruin the “quiet enjoyment” of their property. 

The residents reiterated this position at a Town-led focus group meeting of October 24. Even so, after that meeting, a town staff member phoned one of the residents to suggest that they develop the parcel with a compromise proposal.

Nearby residents don’t want a middle ground
At the focus group meeting, town staff asked the residents if there was a middle ground with which they would be comfortable.  A resident responded: “No. We had open space when we bought this property. There was 10 acres of beautiful ranch land behind me for 40 years.”  

Residents don’t trust OVCN due to past broken promises

It is difficult to reach a compromise if the people involved in reaching the compromise don’t trust each other. In this case, the residents in the area don’t trust OVCN. They look back at history to explain why. 

They contend that OVCN does not follow the current PAD requirements: One resident noted:“The first thing they [OVCN] did when they got the property was they took out the gate that used to be across the entrance that was called for in the PAD. They also chopped down a bunch of trees that were out front that were called for in the PAD.”

Another resident noted: “After OVCN took over the last property, they took out all the vegetation that had helped reduce some of the noise.” Town staff, rather than asking why the PAD requirements had not been followed, asked the applicant what could be done to reduce the noise. Their question was off topic.

Residents point to other reasons for lack of trust. Several years ago, when the possibility of a sports complex was brought before them, residents asked how the complex was going to be funded. OVCN representative Paul Oland told them that it was none of their business. He pointed out that it is "a private company."

The company with whom OVCN is partnering is a nonprofit organization. It is not a “private company.” We discussed this company, Upward Sports, extensively in Monday’s article.

Residents contend that OVCN has pushed it too far

It was the residents who first allowed OVCN to be expanded; then to host various events in the parking lot. One resident noted: “We live there…24-hours a day. They have an audible burglar alarm that goes off all times of the day and night…My wife and I have lived there for 30 years and we’ve put up with this the whole time. Before, we always said “yes” [to the church’s requests] and now is our chance to say “no” because you guys pushed it too far.”

There were many other issues discussed at the focus meeting

Noise
According to Oland, Oro Valley does have a noise ordinance. “As traffic increases there will be more vehicle noise but it will not be out of character [for the area]. We’re not going to have people out there revving their engines.”
Missing “green belt”
During the Neighborhood Meeting last spring, a resident stated that the original OVCN leadership promised a Green Belt around the existing facility and that OVCN should be committed to honoring the agreements that their previous leaders made with the neighbors.  Neither town staff nor the applicant appeared to have any knowledge of this agreement, but town staff agreed to look into it.
Water use

The field will not use water. It will have artificial turf. 

Outdoor concerts

OVCN is not planning to use the complex for concerts. There will be music when there is an outdoor service. The current complex plan includes a screen wall to mitigate the noise. According to town staff, the town’s zoning code has established noise standards and guidelines with which OVCN must comply. There are also noise nuisance requirements that are enforced by the police department. 

Public Hearing Postponed

The focus group meeting was so contentious that the Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for the following Monday was postponed.

---
Want to know more about this situation. Read LOVE’s extensive coverage.

OVCN Council Public Hearing Postponed

Postponement

The Town of Oro Valley postponed the town council public hearing on the proposed rezoning that would enable a sports facility operated by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN). The hearing was scheduled for March 1. The postponement was posted last Friday afternoon. The town has not set a new hearing date.  

No reason given... Just speculation

We do not know the reason for the postponement. There have been several ideas "floated" which are worth sharing:

Is OVCN "tweaking" its request?

OVCN has invested two and a half years working on this rezoning request. They believe that they are entitled by law to build this facility. We reported this past Friday that Pastor Collins was resolute in reporting to the congregation that OVCN was going to press forward. It seems odd that they would simply give up at this point. Perhaps OVCN wants more time to assess how to cobble together the five council votes needed for approval of their request.

Is OVCN "strategizing for litigation"?

Perhaps OVCN thinks that the petition will not get the required five approving council votes. Could they be taking some time to strategize how to use the hearings to provide a legal support to support a law suit. OVCN believes that they are legally entitled to do what they want with the property because of their attorney's interpretation of the law regarding property use of a religious organization. The town's planning and zoning staff used this legal interpretation to reluctantly recommend approval of the rezoning request to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Nonetheless, the commission denied the petition on a very close vote.

Is the Town of Oro Valley working to broker a deal?

The idea has been floated that the town may become involved in trying to create a deal between all parties. Perhaps a land swap could occur where all parties would benefit.  There is precedent for this. The town, led by Mayor Winfield and Vice Mayor Barrett, was instrumental in the final negotiations to create the Vistoso Nature Preserve. 

Will OVCN scale back its request?

OVCN has stated in unequivocal terms that they will not change the request. Have they requested the postponement in order to reshape their plans?  Perhaps they could build an indoor sports facility that meets town building code. At the same time, the town and OVCN could create an arrangement for OVCN to use the fields at Naranja Park. That may not be an ideal situation for OVCN but it does enable them to offer a significant sports program.

Regardless of the reason for the postponement, the neighborhood remains resolute in its opposition to the plan: Meaning no expansion.   LOVE will continue to follow this rezoning request as it develops. With that in mind, tomorrow and Wednesday we present two views in opposition to the rezoning.

Is The OVCN New Sanctuary Height Request Matter Really Dead? Do Their Arguments "Hold Water?

Planning and Zoning Commission denied OVCN height request
Last week, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) to allow the height of a new sanctuary to be greater than currently in place. 

However, OVCN has the right to appeal

We suspect that OVCN will appeal this decision to the Oro Valley Town Council.  That appeal must be requested by early February. Prior to making their decision, OVCN attorney Jerry Steele presented their legal basis for commission why the request should be granted.  We expect to hear the same arguments when the appeal is heard. 

Prior approval supports new height request
The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) representative began by highlighting the Planning and Zoning Commission’s previous approval of a 42-foot roof for a church facility. The current request seeks approval for a 40-foot roof—two feet shorter than what was previously approved and five feet below the 45-foot limit permitted by code. The representative argued that this prior decision sets a clear precedent, making it reasonable for the church to believe their new request would be accepted.

However, under questioning of town council by a commission member it was revealed that "...from a regulatory standpoint, you [the commission] denied the 42 feet and recommended ... that it go forward to council. So this group never approved 42 feet. It might've been on the plan, but it wasn't approved by you."

Concerns about sightline impact lack evidence
Addressing community concerns about obstructed views, the church representative noted that neither residents nor town staff have provided substantial evidence showing significant sightline interference. Town staff reported any interference as minimal. The church also presented photographic "evidence" supporting the claim that the building would be barely visible from neighboring areas, except from its entrance side. The representative emphasized that the proposed structure would sit between the existing 29-foot sanctuary and a nearby 60-foot high school building, suggesting the design fits the area's existing landscape.

A legal "standard" should be used
The church questioned the basis on which the commission would decide—whether on legal standards or public sentiment. The representative pointed out that the commission has granted similar height approvals for other churches and schools, ranging from 36 to 45 feet. Denying OVCN’s request, despite these precedents, could violate the church's right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment. This argument positioned the decision as a matter of consistent legal application rather than community opposition.

Federal law protects religious property use
The representative cited the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prevents government bodies from imposing substantial burdens on religious institutions without a compelling governmental interest. Rejecting the 40-foot roof would force the church to redesign the building, resulting in an estimated additional cost of $6–10 million. This financial impact was presented as a substantial burden, and the representative argued that no compelling governmental interest—such as public safety—justifies such an imposition. Aesthetic concerns, they stressed, do not meet the legal threshold for denying the request.

Prior approvals in other situations should apply here
In conclusion, OVCN urged the commission to honor its prior approval, acknowledge the absence of significant sightline impacts, and recognize the church's legal rights. The representative called for the commission to approve the 40-foot roof height and allow the project to proceed to the next phase of review. The church expressed appreciation for the commission's consideration and awaited its decision.

What could happen next

LOVE believes that OVCN will exercise its right to appeal the decision to the Town Council. It if does not do so, it will have no legal recourse to further pursue this. If the Council affirms the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision, OVCN can then seek remedy through litigation, which could delay the project for a long time, or it could drop the matter and design the facility within the current 29-foot height limit.

Perhaps OVCN will choose to do just that. After all, it does have the deeded right to do so.

But is that right absolute? Read more tomorrow.

- - - 

OVCN Argues That The Town of Oro Valley Has No Authority To Restrict Creation Of New Sports Facilities

OVCN is "playing hardball"
The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) is playing hardball regarding its plan to build a major sports facility next to their church. This is located at the north east corner of W Calle Concordia and N Buena Vista. 

It is their contention that they are entitled to do anything they want with the property regardless of what is the zoning because they are a religious institution . Indeed, they contend that the town has no jurisdiction to oversee this. 

Their position is presented in a letter dated June 13, 2022 (Page 82 of linked document) to the Town of Oro Valley. The town has taken the position that it does have jurisdiction; that the plan should be properly vetted and that the zoning needs to change in order to accommodate OVCN.

It is clear from the letter that OCVN has no interest in the impact that the two facilities will have on the property owners in the area. Local owners are unanimously opposed to this venture.

OVCN has the supreme power as granted by...

According to the letter, the source of the “economic power” to use any property they own for any purpose they wish is the Religious Use and Institutional Persons Act (RLUIPA). The purpose of this law is to prevent “…religious institutions from discrimination in zoning…” in their practice of their religious freedom. 

Their claim is that the sports activity is an extension of their ministry. Indeed, they call the facilities a 
"Sports Ministry Field" and a "Multi-Use Ministry Building." According to OVCN, these are religious facilities.

Key argument: Sports is an integral part of religion

The key argument that OVCN puts forth is that sports activities are an integral part of worship and religious life. As a result, applying RLUIPA: “The town lacks discretion to engage in any further inquiry as to the religious and/or non religious use of the facilities and must find…” that the requested use is permitted as a right of the R-144 zoning district.

OVCN also asserts they they can and possibly will minister at any event held in their facilities.  “OVCN intends that third-party events will constitute only an incidental use of the Sports-Ministry Field and Multi-Use Ministry Building." These third party events include such things as the use of the church facility for Oro Valley Police Department training. The Town of Oro Valley has used the facility for public meetings. 

OVCN partnering with "Upward Sports"... a "profit making" not for profit organization

OVCN is partnering with Upward Sports in this effort. According to them, Upward Sports “…is a ministry that is actively partnering with 1,500 churches nationwide.” Its formal name is "Upward Unlimited". They are a "not for profit" organization that is currently trying to sell its main facilities in Spartanburg, SC for up to $41mil, likely for a huge profit.  

"This property ... previous Upward Sports Complex encompasses ±107 acres which have been subdivided and master planned for a wide variety of uses including multiple commercial assets and development land. Individual sites may be purchased separately or property may be sold in its entirety."

Here's a link to learn more about that.

- - -

Want to learn more about this? Visit LOVE postings. Visit the Town of Oro Valley link for this project.

Guest View: Diane Peters – Protocol Not Followed During the February 7 Planning and Zoning Commission Hearing for OVCN Rezoning

The February 7th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting was a poorly run meeting as both the Chair and the Town Attorney failed to take control of the meeting.

Chairman Herrington has only been the Chair for about a month or so, so maybe he's not yet confident enough to speak up, but this is where the expertise of the town attorney comes in and he should have spoken up and given some direction.

Below are some of the problems that occurred that evening.

Five OVCN congregants were allowed to speak prior to the Public Hearing
The applicant pulled “a stunt” in scheduling five people from OVCN to speak during the applicant’s presentation rather than later in the evening during the Public Hearing.

Although the Chair did speak up when one OVCN congregant began her speech and suggested that her speech was more appropriate for the public hearing, she was adamant and said, “I was asked to speak as a member of the church and so this is what I’ve prepared.” She then continued with her speech and he allowed it. She should have been told to come back and speak during the public hearing like everyone else.

Four other OVCN congregants were also allowed to speak during the applicant’s presentation rather than during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting as is customary.

OVCN members were allowed to applaud after each OCVN speaker was finished speaking
Prior to the Public Hearing, when OVCN representatives and congregants were speaking at the podium, the OVCN audience was applauding after each speech and the Chair allowed it and did not instruct them to cease from applauding. He did not issue a directive of no applause until it was time for the Public Hearing portion when people opposed to the rezoning would also be speaking.

Pastor Collins spent a lot of time making derogatory comments about the neighbors
What does his opinion of the neighbors have to do with the rezoning and why didn't the Chair or the town attorney stop him and instruct him to change the direction of his speech? I've seen council members call a Point of Order when a speaker becomes disrespectful. Shouldn’t this also be done during Planning and Zoning hearings?

The church’s attorney spoke but never identified himself
After Paul Oland’s presentation (the applicant representing the church), Oland said that the OVCN attorney was going to speak next but he never introduced him by name. When the attorney approached the podium, he also never stated his name. He just launched into his speech and the Chair did not interrupt him and tell him to state his name for the record. Isn't it incumbent on the Chair to interrupt the speaker and require that they state their name and whether they are a resident of Oro Valley?

Speakers from OVCN were allowed to witness to God and Jesus during the meeting
Why is this allowed when it’s irrelevant to the topic being discussed? Others in attendance should not have to be subjected to their religious proselytizing and witnessing to God at these meetings. That is not the purpose of the meeting and it just causes the meeting to drag on for much longer than necessary. Can the chair instruct speakers that this will not be allowed and that they must discuss the rezoning only?

“You’re out of order! This whole hearing is out of order!”
I thought I’d toss in a little Al Pacino humor.

This whole incident reminded me of how the Green Shirts took over the town meetings during the golf course discussions and how no one stopped them despite them being extremely rude to town officials and also to any speakers who spoke in opposition to keeping the golf courses open. The town should be in control of the meetings -- not OVCN, not the Green Shirts, or any group that exhibits this kind of behavior.

This rezoning will now be heard and voted on by the Town Council. I hope the mayor and town attorney will not allow a repeat performance of the breach of protocol that transpired at this Planning and Zoning meeting.

---
Diane Peters has lived in Oro Valley since 2003, moving here to escape the humidity of the East Coast. She’s been involved in OV politics and development issues since 2006, including organizing a citizens group in 2014 that spent 9 months negotiating a controversial 200-acre development project. In her past life, she worked in medical research at various University Hospitals in New England. Her interests include reading, writing, nature photography, travel, art galleries, museums, and politics.

OVCN’s Expansion: Pastor Collins’ Interview Ignites Resident Concerns

Pastor Collins of Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) was interviewed on October 15th by KGUN News to discuss the church’s recent change of plans regarding their expansion.

The original plan
As LOVE has previously reported, OVCN’s original plan was to create a sports-based ministry in a rural neighborhood including an indoor multi-purpose sports complex and an outdoor ballfield with stadium lighting. This plan required a rezoning approval. This has resulted in a 4-year long battle with the neighbors who vehemently oppose this expansion as it will severely impact their rural neighborhood and peaceful way of life.

The revised plan
Although OVCN has not formally withdrawn their original plan, their new plan (revealed during a Neighborhood Meeting at the Town Hall on September 26th) is to build a new sanctuary (for which they are requesting a height variance of 40 feet.) The new plan also includes a student center, maintenance building, and a new parking lot to accommodate approximately 600 more vehicles.

The KGUN Interview
Reporter Kenny Darr stated that, “Pastor Collins believes these plans better align with the church’s mission while minimizing potential concerns from neighbors.”

During the interview, Pastor Collins stated,

“We believe that strong churches make for strong communities and so we want to make a difference for our community. We’re not doing that in any intentional way to disrupt or ruin anybody’s life who happens to be in close proximity to our church property here, but we think there’s a high value in what our church is offering our community, and we want as many people in Oro Valley to be able to benefit from that as possible.”

This prompted numerous rebuttals from residents living adjacent to OVCN and from other Oro Valley residents who have been following this saga for the past four years. Below are excerpts from some of those rebuttals.

A small neighborhood church becomes a megachurch
What began as a small neighborhood house of worship has metastasized into an enormous church. With it has come unbelievable traffic transforming a quiet neighborhood into a huge parking lot not only on Sunday but also on other days when the congregation gathers. Hundreds of cars park on both sides of several streets (no sidewalks) leaving unsafe conditions for people who are walking or jogging, people on horses or bikes, and parents with children in strollers.

Pastor Collins says that he wants to serve the community. Where is this community? Congregants are driving -- not walking to this church. Who knows how far they travel to get to the church. A church is a house of worship. So why then do they want to build a multi-purpose facility? Multi-purpose for what? And then a student center. What does that have to do with worship?

This area is already flood-prone. Adding more blacktop and more buildings is going to be a disaster in the making for residents and the horse stables close by. During monsoon season, these streets are impassable because there is no storm drainage. I personally waded several times through flowing water on Loma Linda to get to my home. And this water came from Calle Concordia.

Name withheld by request

Is it a sanctuary or a basketball court?
It amuses me that the new building (that they want a height variance for) is now called a sanctuary and youth center. At our meeting with Pastor Coulter (5 neighbors met with him on August 1st in the church meeting room) he said they needed the height for two basketball courts with stacking seating for multi-purpose use. RLUIPA (the Federal Religious Land Use Act) states that preferences can be given to churches for “religion related activities.” Since basketball courts do not fall under “religion related activities” they have changed the wording of their variance. But if Planning and Zoning approves the height variance, what is to stop OVCN from putting in the basketball courts, which will increase usage of the property and the traffic to most every day and night -- not just Sundays. Well-played OVCN.

Tricia Tozier

Close Encounters of an unwanted kind
Pastor Collins’ comment, “We believe that strong churches make for strong communities and so we want to make a difference for our community” -- My response is that the neighbors are the primary stakeholders of our community and do not want expansion in our community.

In response to Collins’ other comment, “We’re not doing that (expansion) in any intentional way to disrupt or ruin anybody’s life who happens to be in close proximity to our church property here.” -- It has been made abundantly clear that expansion is not welcome. Unintended consequences are intentional if you are informed of the harm, yet you persist.

OVCN's plans are to circumvent the law by repackaging their rezoning expansion plans into a height-variance expansion plan. The net result and intentional harm to the neighborhood are the same.

If not the community, then who is OVCN's expansion serving? Certainly not Jesus. We can't get out of OVCN traffic to get to our own church on time.

Jennifer Jacobson

OVCN has a history of unintended consequences
Pastor Collins claims that they are not intentionally trying to disrupt the lives of those living near the church. Intentional or not, it doesn’t mean that there won’t be unintended consequences or collateral damage.

Case in point: OVCN has already disrupted the neighbors’ lives with their loudspeakers, loud music, bright lights, and high traffic volume. I'm sure that wasn't "intentional" either, but it happened, nevertheless.

And since the church refuses to withdraw their original rezoning request, that signals to me that they have more up their sleeve for the future (as one neighbor speculated during the Town Hall Neighborhood Meeting, “Is this just the camel’s nose under the tent?”)

Diane Peters
---

OVCN Set To Release New Building Plan

OVCN Rezoning Press Release
- - -

A new facility strategy is needed to meet the growing needs at OVCN 

Nearly five years ago, Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) began the process of rezoning parts of their current 28-acre property. The request for rezoning centered around community outreach with the addition of on-campus sports ministry facilities and programming. OVCN has identified a need and opportunity to impact kids and families with faith-based sports clubs and leagues in and around Oro Valley. The church is committed to living out the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20) and is relentless in their efforts to present the gospel and to make disciples. They are also committed to the Great Commandment (Matthew 22:36-40), which instructs us to love God and love our neighbors. Every ministry strategy reflects a passionate pursuit of these two commands.

Since the beginning of the rezoning process with the town of Oro Valley, OVCN has seen a 60% increase in church attendance. As our neighbors in and around the Oro Valley area were looking for a church that was committed to the Great Commission and the Great Commandment, they found a home at OVCN. As a result of this growth, OVCN has prayerfully reevaluated the rezoning request, facility needs, and vision. The delay in this process proved to be necessary to pivot to a facility plan that could serve the needs of the church and the local community better. Sports ministry will continue to be part of the church’s plan to fulfill the Great Commission in Oro Valley and additional campuses.

OVCN staff and church leadership will seek to meet the needs of the church family through additional facilities utilizing existing zoning on their current property.
Plans are being developed and will be submitted through the application process set forth by the town of Oro Valley. With the addition of a new sanctuary, multi-purpose room, and classroom/conference building, OVCN will be equipped to meet the needs of a growing church in a growing community. Eliminating the request for rezoning will significantly simplify the process moving forward.

- - -

(Source: Oro Valley Church of The Nazarene Press Release, September 10, 2024)

Oro Valley Town Council to Hear OVCN Appeal

Oro Valley town council to decide on OVCN appeal
The Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's January decision denying the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) permission to build a new sanctuary with a height of 40 feet. The current allowable height on the property is 24 feet, but the town has the authority to grant a higher limit.

OVCN claims unfair standards and disregard for evidence
OVCN is appealing the decision, arguing that it is unjust and unfair. They claim the Commission disregarded substantial evidence supporting their proposal, applied inconsistent standards, and failed to consider the broader community benefits. As an example, they argue that the Commission unfairly scrutinized the volume of activities and attendance at their facility compared to similar projects.

Town staff’s response: Height request tied to safety and seating capacity
Town staff responded to some of these assertions. In their meeting notice to the council, they state that the proposed sanctuary height increase is directly tied to accommodating auditorium-style seating for over 1,500 people. They cite International Building Code requirements, which mandate specific roof heights for safety and sightlines. Staff also note that increased seating capacity affects parking and traffic considerations.

Significant Community opposition
Community members oppose the height request. In just one week, more than 600 residents have signed a petition urging the town to deny the appeal.

Three resolution options...but there could be more
Town staff has proposed three resolution options for the council’s consideration:

• Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of OVCN’s height increase request.
• Overrule the denial with conditions, allowing a maximum height of 29 feet plus an additional 5 feet for parapet screening, but only in areas necessary to fully screen mechanical equipment, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
• Overrule the denial and fully approve the height increase request, subject to conditions outlined in the staff report, including landscape buffers and positioning requirements to minimize visual impact.

Uncertainty over the 29-foot option
The inclusion of the 29-foot option is unclear, as OVCN withdrew it from consideration. Initially, OVCN proposed a 29-foot height, assuming part of the sanctuary would be built underground, but they rescinded this request a week later. It is unknown whether the council will discuss this or other height options at tonight’s meeting. The council has the authority to modify these options or propose its own. For example, they may consider continuing the item for further discussion or negotiation.

Next steps for OVCN
If the council does not approve the 40-foot height, OVCN has two alternatives. They can either build the sanctuary within the existing 24-foot height limit or pursue legal action, potentially including a federal court challenge, if they believe their rights under federal law, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA-See Below), have been violated. 

Stay tuned for updates on this decision.

- - -
RLUIPA protects religious institutions from discriminatory land use regulations by requiring governments to apply the same standards as they do for non-religious entities and to justify any substantial burden with a compelling interest pursued in the least restrictive way. Protecting the character and livability of a neighborhood, particularly regarding noise, traffic, public safety, or environmental impact, is a compelling government interest, as long as the government can demonstrate that the restriction is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest and is applied in a non-discriminatory manner.

Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene: A David and Goliath Story

The below speech was written by Oro Valley resident, Ed Clary, and was presented during the Call to Audience at the March 1 Town Council Meeting.
---
“This evening, I’d like to discuss the proposed rezone of residential property acquired by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN).

The Planning and Zoning Commission rejected the proposal [on February 7th] after literally years of the town staff working to bring it into compliance with the General Plan. By the time it gets to the Planning and Zoning Commission, it’s almost unheard of for a project to still not be compliant. Yet, OVCN clearly is so inflexible that it cannot accomplish this.

Nonetheless, they are given endless opportunity after opportunity. OVCN kicks the can down the road while they work to either elect a favorable Council or delay review by the Planning and Zoning Commission until new commissioners are appointed, or they threaten litigation if they don’t get their way, in much the same way that a playground bully threatens -- Give me what I want or else.

From the pulpit, OVCN has equated this situation as akin to the battle between David and Goliath. Interestingly though, OVCN asserts that it is David, despite its at least three deep pocket outside supporters and thousands of congregants all led and organized by impassioned ministers. Goliath, in this scenario, is the Town (who is neutral and has bent over backwards to facilitate the process despite OVCN intransigence) and several dozen neighbors (almost all of whom have been ignored wholesale by OVCN). If it weren’t so disturbing, it would be laughable at every level. Who is bullying whom?

OVCN has threatened a lawsuit which is based on the legal premise that a church can essentially do anything it wants with its land if it asserts that what they want to do or build is required for their religion. Don’t be intimidated. Every legal precept has limits. Example: One cannot yell fire in a crowded theater, the First Amendment notwithstanding.

Sports are wonderful but they are not required to practice one’s religion. If they were, why doesn’t every Nazarene church have such facilities?

Where does this stop? If you approve this, what precedent have you set? Every entity in the Town, be it another church, a business, or a private citizen, will now be able to say, “You approved this for them, you need to approve such an egregious waiver for me, too.” Zoning will cease to have any function or place in Oro Valley.

The Planning and Zoning Commission’s job is to ensure it meets code. It doesn’t – that’s why they rejected it, and that alone should be enough for you to reject it as well. But even if it met code, it’s also your job to decide whether something is a good idea and in the right location or not. And at every level, this isn’t the right location for this project.

So the answer is simple. Do the right thing, vote against the proposal, and let the chips fall where they may -- because if you are intimidated, the law of unintended consequences will wreak more havoc than any lawsuit that OVCN files.”
---

OVCN Revising Project...But Battle With Community Will Continue

Church to move facilities 150 feet from three opposing resident lot lines

The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) is revising their rezoning proposal for their sports complex project. This will cause the project to be heard once again by the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission. 

Change would result in requiring one less council vote for approval

We do not know the details of the revision, but we do know that it includes moving the western edge of the rezone area 150 feet to the east, away from neighbor lot lines. If this is the case, then the requirement for Town Council approval would be a 4-vote majority rather than a 5-vote supermajority. The timetable of the approval process for this project is unclear.  Regardless, the community, especially those who are most closely affected by the facility if approved, are united against it. 

Community is resolute in opposition

Regardless, the community, especially those who are most closely affected by the facility if approved, are united against it. Today, we present two "Guest Views:" One is from Tim Tarris, head of the Concordia/Buena-Vista Group. The other is from Don Cox, former Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commissioner. Both Tim and Don oppose the project at that location because the sports facilities do not fit within that community. Both would like to see a compromise in which OVCN builds the facilities elsewhere. Simply redrawing the rezone request the facilities 150 feet to the east is not that compromise.

- - -

Guest View: Tim Tarris

The simple redrawing of the rezone area, if that is what they plan to offer, is not a solution. It has the effect of negating four of the neighbors that signed the formal protest filed over a year ago. Fourteen of the adjoining neighbors (100%) signed that formal protest which requires the “super majority” of the Town Council to approve. (See Arizona Revised Statute 9-462.04H and Oro Valley Town Code ZC 23.3L.)

An action of this type is an attempt to “bend the rules” in the church’s favor. In all reality, nothing in a new submission of this nature has changed. All of the reasons (traffic, noise, lighting, etc.), that have caused the strong opposition by the neighbors, remain. It is effectively a “line in the sand” as the western section is a parking lot and will remain so. It is an intentional effort to dismiss and invalidate the wishes of the neighbors.

Many people have noticed the Concordia/Buena Vista Group (C/BV) informational (pink) signs. Sadly, some people have gone on private property and “free speech” zones (where signs are allowed) and vandalized or removed these signs. Additionally, one neighbor (displaying a sign) was verbally accosted in front of his own home by a passing motorist while tending to his sign. All of these events resulted in police reports being filed.

The C/BV group position has always remained the same. We support sports, youth and religion, but this sports complex would be devastating to this historic Oro Valley neighborhood. We actively hope that OVCN would find a much more appropriate location. The church, the neighbors and the community of Oro Valley will benefit from that solution.

- - -

Guest View: Don Cox

First, I want everybody to understand that when I voice an opinion on this or any other matter, it is only my opinion. I am not speaking on behalf of any other party!! 

I believe OVCN requested the postponement to regroup after the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial the application. What’s puzzling to me, as a former member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, is why there was a second vote on other matters included in the application. It seems those subsequent issues became moot once the recommendation to deny was made. I believe the P&Z [ Planning and Zoning Commission] erred in this regard.

I have been told by reliable sources that OVCN has an alternate plan. I have also suggested that since there are more multi-purpose fields coming on line in the relatively near future, OVCN and the Town may be able to work out some deal with the Town of Oro Valley that is compatible to all parties (Town/Neighbors/OVCN). If not then I see this issue heading to litigation. That’s not beneficial to any party. The Town needs to get more involved. Once again their secrecy isn’t doing them and favors.

OVCN bought the property in question. That property comes with established zoning rights. The neighborhood is only asking that those zoning rights be complied with….nothing more or less. In this instance I support the neighbors completely. That’s what’s best, in my opinion, for the Town.

(Don's view first appeared in Nextdoor.com. We are reprinting it with his permission)  
- - -

OVCN Gets 36-Foot Height Approval as Council Sidesteps Conflict, Overrides Commission

Town Council approved 36-foot height for new OVCN sanctuary
After a two-and-a-half-hour discussion last Wednesday, the Oro Valley Town Council approved a maximum height of 36 feet for a new sanctuary building planned by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN). In doing so, the Council overruled the Planning and Zoning Commission’s earlier decision, which had limited the building height to 24 feet. For comparison, the church’s existing sanctuary stands at 29 feet.

But not without "drama"
As previously reported, OVCN had requested an eight-month continuance to submit a more complete set of conceptual plans. Church representatives argued that pairing the height request with a full development plan would give the Council and the public more context—particularly regarding traffic, parking, drainage, and landscaping.

However, as Vice Mayor Melanie Barrett noted during the discussion, the Town already had sufficient information to decide the height question. “We know what the height is. We have the plans. We are not lacking information to make a decision on height,” she said, adding that the site’s context and the Planning and Zoning Commission’s findings gave the Council what it needed to act now.

After denying a continuance ...
After hearing 16 public comments—both for and against the continuance—the Council narrowly voted 4–3 to deny the delay. The motion to continue was made by Mayor Joe Winfield, who believed the additional time and planning detail would help the Council reach a better decision. Barrett’s position prevailed, and she was joined by Councilmembers Nicholson, Robb, and Jones-Ivey in voting no.

…Attention turned to the height request
With the continuance denied, the Council turned its attention to the appeal itself—specifically, whether to uphold or overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of the height exception. The Council chose not to deliberate on whether the Commission had erred. Instead, they bypassed that issue and directly overruled the decision, granting a modified height exception.

Barrett proposed a 29-foot option
During that discussion, Vice Mayor Barrett proposed limiting the height to 29 feet—the same as the existing sanctuary. She noted that this would have been consistent with what the church had previously offered earlier in the process. Given our understanding of the situation, we have little doubt that had she remained firm, that suggestion would have passed.

But then, late in the game, Barrett took a huge “leap of faith”
However, Barrett later withdrew that suggestion and agreed to support the 36-foot height limit—but only on the condition that OVCN make a genuine effort to work with nearby residents to address their concerns. She emphasized that while she supported the increased height in this case, it came with the expectation that the church would actively engage the community and demonstrate responsiveness going forward.

“If the Town Council grants the 36 feet, you will still go through a development plan review process and work with neighbors and address any traffic concerns such as potential road widening, parking issues, etc., correct?” she asked. OVCN’s representative responded that they would be happy to do so.

However, according to individuals who oppose the height request, OVCN’s history of working with neighbors over the past four years has been anything but forthright.

Council approved 36' height
The final motion, which passed unanimously, stated:

“I move to overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission denial of the building height increase request and conditionally grant a building height increase of 36 feet maximum, including conditions one, two, and four.”

These conditions require that the new building not exceed 36 feet in height as shown in the submitted plans, that a future development plan must align with this height approval, and that the height limit excludes rooftop features like parapets or mechanical screens.

Much to the joy of Councilmember Greene who, despite clear ethicL conflict, voted and then celebrated OVCN victory
Councilmember Mo Greene is a member of OVCN. Despite this clear ethical conflict of interest, Greene did not recuse himself from the vote, nor did any councilmember raise the issue. Instead, Green voted in favor of the church’s request and, when the motion passed, applauded and raised his hand in celebration toward the audience. His reaction is captured in the panel at left.

Fortunately, Barrett spared the Planning and Zoning Commission from rehashing a height request it already rejected
The next step is for the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene to submit a development plan. That plan will first be reviewed by Town staff, then by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and finally by the Town Council.

Vice Mayor Barrett’s insistence on deciding the height now—rather than postponing the matter—ensured that the final decision rested with the Council, not the Commission, which had already reviewed and rejected the height request earlier this year.

Residents will have additional opportunities to participate during the upcoming development plan process.
- - -

Residents Ask: "Put Yourself In Their Shoes" on OVCN Rezoning Request

A proposed OVCN development project will forever change the character of "Old Oro Valley"

There is a development project that is being proposed by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (“OVCN”). The Church is located on the northeast intersection of Concordia and Buena Vista. The Church is adjacent to an area zoned as large lot (144,000 sq ft) residential. It owns some of this land. These lots are what remains of the original Oro Valley. 

The Church wants to change the zoning designation on the land that it owns. As LOVE has reported, OVCN wants to build athletic facilities on this property. In order to do this, the land must be rezoned.

Every resident in the area is opposed to the project

Residents have been attending planning and zoning hearings and town council meetings, stating their objection to the proposed project. In the interest of encouraging a discussion on the matter, LOVE plans to present the remarks of some who live in the area over the next several weeks. Residents ask only that you “put yourself in their shoes” and read what they have to say.

Our first of these remarks is from resident Ed Clary. Clary addressed the Oro Valley Town Council in May
- - -
“Hello, my name is Ed Clary, and I, my wife and sons have been residents of Oro Valley for nearly 10 years.  This evening I would like to discuss with you the proposed rezoning of the property of the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene, which, to be clear, I do not in any way support.  

The proposal, which I’m sure you all are familiar with, is admirable on its surface, but it’s simply not the right area for such a facility.   

I’m going to repeat something I’ve actually said to many of you in person or via Zoom at the last two annual meetings involving the Town facility at 680 W Calle Concordia, which is literally 3 doors down the road from OVCN, and this proposal. Previously I said, “When the time comes for you to consider the proposed rezone less than ¼ mile from here, please remember that the impact of 680, the current OVCN campus, CDO High School, Kriegh Park and the Aquatic Center is greater than the sum of its parts on those of us who live here.”   

Today, the sum of those parts sits at a level where the character of the surrounding neighborhood is endangered.  All 5 of the facilities I mentioned are contiguous with each other, with the exception of 3 private residences.   

This proposal is simply incompatible with the area, no matter how good the intent.  That’s why we have zoning.  I’m sure most of you live in residential areas.  Would you want this project in your backyard? With all due respect, if you say yes, I might like to question you further.  It simply doesn’t fit.  Neighborhood resistance is nearly monolithic.  Fourteen out of fourteen property owners in the area have protested in writing to the Town.  There is no demonstrable benefit in this plan for any neighbor, not one, in fact it hurts us all for reasons that include, but are not limited to significant drops in property values, light and noise pollution, traffic and drainage issues, plus the loss of residential views of Pusch Ridge.   

CDO High School predated the Town of Oro Valley and has been the boundary between development and R-144 residential property for more than a half century.  It should remain that boundary without a compelling reason in the public interest, and that is KEY.  OVCN certainly has a private interest, but ladies and gentlemen, that’s not your concern if the surrounding public is being hurt.  You were elected to serve the public interest.  Five basketball courts and a football field available to outsiders for a fee, controlled by a private organization does not create a compelling public interest.  If approved the effect of this new, enormous, additional facility when combined with what I listed above will finally go well, well beyond the sum of the individual parts.  It will fundamentally transform the neighborhood, literally at the expense of those who live there for the benefit of those who almost exclusively do not.  Where is the compelling PUBLIC interest, when the surrounding public is telling you with a bullhorn that as a group we are not interested?  

In closing, I generally wish OVCN well – they are one of my neighbors, and I too am a regular churchgoer, I just don’t attend OVCN.  However, they bought the land in question knowing the current rules, and while they have every right to request something different, if they could not abide by those rules they should not have made the purchase.  There is no compelling public interest that indicates they should not be required to live by the same rules all the rest of us do.  I respectfully ask that should the matter come before the Council to vote, you vote against the proposal.”  

- - - 

Is Construction of A New OVCN Sanctuary Inevitable? Maybe Yes. Maybe No.

Resident objections to OVCN expansion reflect common development concerns, but are they enough to halt the project?

The Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) has the zoning rights to expand its property, including building a larger sanctuary. Despite this legal entitlement, the proposed expansion has faced significant opposition from nearby residents. 

These objections, while passionate and numerous, generally align with arguments that have been used in other communities to challenge developments. Historically, some of these arguments have successfully delayed or stopped projects, while others have been less effective.

Common, successful arguments against a development
Environmental Concerns
One of the most effective arguments against development projects centers on environmental impact. If a project threatens local ecosystems, contributes to erosion or flooding, or harms protected species, it can face significant legal challenges. In the case of the OVCN expansion, concerns about increased stormwater runoff or the removal of natural vegetation could be raised if supported by environmental studies.
Traffic and Infrastructure Impact
Increased traffic congestion and strain on infrastructure are frequently cited concerns that have successfully delayed or altered development projects. Residents near OVCN have expressed worries that a larger sanctuary will draw more attendees, worsening traffic on local roads and potentially overwhelming parking capacity. If traffic studies substantiate these concerns, they could form a solid basis for pushing for project modifications.
Noncompliance with Comprehensive or General Plans
If the OVCN expansion conflicts with Oro Valley's broader land-use or comprehensive planning goals, this could serve as a legal basis for objection. However, since the church's expansion is permitted under current zoning, this argument may not apply unless specific planning inconsistencies are identified.
Public Safety Concerns
Concerns that increased traffic could hamper emergency vehicle access or create safety hazards for pedestrians, especially in residential neighborhoods, can be compelling. Some of the residents in the area do require medical assistance from time to time. That assistance could be required at any time. Yes. Even during the hours when the church is in operation. Demonstrating that the expansion would significantly compromise public safety in general or of persons living in the area of could pressure the town to impose conditions or seek modifications.

Less successful arguments
Aesthetic and Community Character Concerns
Objections that the new sanctuary would clash with the neighborhood's appearance or disrupt the community's character are common but rarely successful unless the area has strict design guidelines or historic preservation rules. Since the OVCN property is already developed as a church, this argument holds limited weight.
General Community Opposition
While community opposition can influence decision-makers, it is typically not enough on its own to block a project. Unless opposition is paired with specific legal or regulatory violations,  such as environmental violations, civil rights violations, or ethics violations, general dissatisfaction carries limited legal power.
Property Value Impact
Claims that a project will lower nearby property values are difficult to prove and are generally not sufficient grounds for denial. Courts and zoning boards rarely prioritize speculative economic impacts over property owners' rights.
Noise and Light Pollution
Concerns about potential increases in noise or light from larger gatherings or nighttime events are valid but often addressed through mitigation measures rather than outright denial. Noise ordinances and lighting regulations usually govern these issues.

Will resident objections be enough?
While Oro Valley residents have raised numerous objections to the OVCN expansion, the success of these efforts depends on the nature of the concerns and how well they align with legal or regulatory standards. Arguments based on environmental impact, traffic congestion, and public safety have historically been more effective in slowing or altering projects. In contrast, aesthetic concerns and general opposition without legal grounding tend to carry less weight.

For residents hoping to influence the outcome, focusing on well-documented, legally grounded concerns seems to be the most effective strategy moving forward.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Children’s Museum reports growth, outreach, and unique new exhibits 

At the April 2, 2025 Town Council meeting, Hillary Van Alsburg, Executive director of the Children’s Museum, delivered an update highlighting the museum’s continued growth and community outreach. She reported that over 31,000 people visited the museum at Tohono Chul in the past year, and nearly 3,000 attended the “Chillin at the Chul” program. Additional outreach brought activities to five Oro Valley parks, reaching nearly 200 children, and special events like “Hallow Halloween” and the Oro Valley 50th Anniversary Parade drew 1,800 participants. New educational features were introduced, including “Ready-Set-Explore” backpacks for garden exploration and monthly clay art sessions with professional artists. She also previewed upcoming additions such as an agriculture-themed play area, the La Comunidad pretend market space, and a new prickly pear exhibit—reportedly the only one of its kind in the world. Learn more about the Children’s Museum.

“Serving with Compassion—Not at the Expense of Neighbors”

Resident Vicki Tarris sent us thoughts regarding the OVCN proposed sanctuary height meeting. About fourteen church member spoke at the meeting.  

"I listened to the Town Council meeting on April 2, 2025. A lot of people from OVCN came to give testimonials on what OVCN means in their life.  I am really happy that so many people have found OVCN to meet their spiritual needs.

 

However, they implied that OVCN was the only church in town that offers children’s programs and helps the needy.

 

I am happy to say that I get a great deal of spiritual comfort from my own church.  We also have a very active children's program. We also feed the homeless. We also help the poor. We also have numerous ways that people can become involved.

 

However, the one way that my church differs from OVCN is that my church does not deliberately harm their neighbors!"

Solomon urged unity—if you agree with OVCN

Former town council member Steve Solomon spoke passionately in support of OVCN during the April 2 meeting. He described the church as “amazing” and shared how it had positively transformed his life. He expressed admiration for the church’s outreach and missions—specifically mentioning a woman he met at work who was going to Guatemala to teach women how to sew. Solomon emphasized the importance of kindness and community, saying, “We just need to love each other and be kind and get along.” 

- - -