Council And Residents Ask: When Should No Parking Be Waived?

Bagging a"No Parking" sign is not a simple decision

What town staff thought would be a simple decision turned into a lengthy discussion with Council last week. Staff came forward to codify a long-standing practice: Temporarily covering (“bagging”) no-parking signs to allow overflow parking during events. Staff proposed an ordinance to authorize the Town Engineer and Chief of Police to suspend no-parking restrictions under circumstances when nearby parking options have been exhausted and safety can be maintained. Instead of a routine discussion of the item, staff encountered a wary public and a cautious Council, both of which raised a series of questions the proposed ordinance.

Longstanding practice lacks legal authority
The Town Engineer’s office proposed the ordinance after finding that the long-standing practice of staff approving “bagging” no-parking signs had no basis in Town Code. Requests have been reviewed and approved by the Town Engineer and Police Chief, based on the impact that bagging would have on safety. They have been doing this for more than 20 years, granting perhaps ten events each year. It occurs most often in the area around Kriegh Park, the Aquatic Center, and Canyon del Oro High School. Events there can attract a large number of attendees, creating demand for parking that exceeds what is available.

OVCN request brings issue to light
Staff brought the ordinance to Council after a recent request to allow temporary parking in the Calle Concordia/Buena Vista area prompted them to review the code and realize no formal authority existed. While staff emphasized that the proposed ordinance was not tied to any single applicant, they specifically mentioned a request by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene for an upcoming event. Street parking in and around OVCN was prohibited by Town Council last year, following significant effort by area residents. As a result, any suspension of those no-parking restrictions is a significant concern for those who live nearby.

Residents raise safety and fairness concerns
Which is why residents who live in the area showed up at the meeting to express their concerns. Three residents spoke, raising strong concerns about safety. They cited increased traffic in their neighborhood and general disruption. They also questioned whether it would be fair for the Town to waive parking restrictions that were put in place to protect them from traffic congestion and safety risks, and to preserve the quiet enjoyment of their property. They noted that more residents would have attended to express similar concerns but chose not to attend out of fear for their personal safety.

Council seeks clearer rules and stronger safeguards
Council discussion reflected many of the same concerns. Members focused on how an ordinance could be written to ensure consistency, fairness, and safety. Several councilmembers questioned how “special events” should be defined, noting that without clear limits the exception could become routine, particularly in areas where events occur frequently. Others emphasized the need to include explicit safety requirements in the code, such as traffic control measures, rather than leaving those decisions solely to staff discretion. Council also raised concerns about notifying nearby residents, the timing of when signs would be covered, and whether recurring events should qualify at all. In addition, they raised questions about who should bear the cost of implementing the temporary changes and whether different types of applicants should be treated differently.

Council delays decision pending revisions
Council took no action on the proposed ordinance. They directed staff to return with a revised ordinance that addresses the concerns raised. They asked staff to refine the definition of qualifying events, incorporate clearer safety requirements, consider a notification process for affected residents, and address issues such as timing, frequency, and cost. During the discussion, staff said the current informal practice would likely continue in the interim, particularly with upcoming events, though no formal direction was given. The item was ultimately tabled, with Council indicating it will revisit the issue later this year, likely after additional review and input from the Town Attorney and staff.

- - -

The Top Five Stories That Shaped Oro Valley In 2025

As the new year begins, it’s a good time to look back at the stories that shaped Oro Valley in 2025. Throughout the year, LOVE's 186 articles closely followed debates, decisions, and developments that had lasting impacts on residents and the Town’s direction. These      five stories stood out for their significance, the level of public engagement they generated, and the way they moved long-running issues toward resolution.

- - -

OVCN matter is finally "settled"

After years of controversy over the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s proposed expansion, including fights over rezoning for a sports facility, building height variances, and neighborhood concerns about traffic, noise and character, the long-running saga came to a close in 2025 when the Oro Valley Town Council approved a conditional height of 36 feet for the church’s new sanctuary. The issue drew extensive community involvement, with the Planning and Zoning Commission initially denying the church’s height request and residents urging the council to block expansion, while supporters cited community benefits. By granting a modified height approval and setting expectations for ongoing neighbor engagement, the council brought a resolution to a dispute about what will happen at that property, a dispute that had persisted for several years.

Police Pay Agreement Ends Lengthy Negotiations

One of 2025’s most closely watched local issues was the long, sometimes contentious process to finalize a new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Town of Oro Valley and the Oro Valley Police Officers Association. After several months of discussions and multiple competing proposals, in May, prompted by concerns over pay, recruitment, and retention, the Town Council delayed action to obtain detailed cost comparisons and give both sides time to refine their offers. Council and union representatives worked through these differences, and on June 4 the council unanimously approved a new four-year MOU that includes competitive pay increases and cost-of-living adjustments, bringing resolution to a negotiation that drew strong community interest and debate about public safety and fiscal sustainability. 

Oro Valley Moves Forward on New Police Headquarters

In 2025 the Town of Oro Valley took major steps toward a new police headquarters, unanimously approving the purchase of a 50,500-square-foot building at 13101 North Oracle Road to replace the outdated La Cañada Drive facility and consolidate scattered offices into a central location. Council members also adjusted the town’s reserve requirement to free $2.42 million toward the project, reflecting a commitment to fiscal planning and public safety. The site, formerly a medical office complex, was acquired for $3.8 million and will be renovated in phases to include expanded training space, offices and support areas for officers and civilian staff. Town leaders said the move will improve department efficiency, enhance community services and accommodate long-term growth.

Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve to Get a Pond

In 2025 the long-awaited plan for the Vistoso Trails Nature Preserve took a significant step forward when the Oro Valley Town Council voted 4-2 to restore a 2.5-acre pond on the former golf course site, reversing earlier concepts that had removed a water feature from the master plan and favoring reclaimed water for the project. The decision followed months of debate over costs, design alternatives and how best to balance restoration with water conservation, with council members and residents weighing the community value of a focal water feature against long-term maintenance and environmental concerns. Staff later reported progress on preliminary pond design and related ADA trail improvements, keeping the project moving toward construction in the near future.  

    

Community Center Sales Tax Moved Into General Fund

In 2025 the Oro Valley Town Council voted to redirect the half-cent sales tax that had been dedicated to the Community Center Fund into the town’s general fund while keeping the Community Center Fund as a reporting mechanism supported by budgeted transfers. The change came after discussion about the flexibility needed to address broader town priorities such as roads and public safety, even as parks and recreation programs remain a focus of budget planning. Council members agreed the transparency of showing transfers to the Community Center Fund would be preserved, allowing residents to track how these revenues continue to support community center and recreation services within the broader financial picture.  

Honorable mentions from 2025

Other stories that shaped Oro Valley in 2025 include: 

• The Town advanced the 2026 General Plan through the OV Path Forward process. Residents will vote on that plan this coming November.
• Town staff updated its five-year financial forecast, identifying a potential funding gap four years from now.  
• The Northwest Recharge, Recovery and Delivery System (NWRRDS), a major regional water-supply project with long-term implications for Oro Valley's water supply received major added funding. That project is expected to be completed at the end of this year.  
• Governance changes also drew attention, including the decision to hire a town attorney who reports directly to council. 
• On the economic and community side, long-delayed activity finally began at the Oro Valley Marketplace, while a Tourism Advisory Commission was created to help shape the town's tourism future. 
• Community life was enriched by the return of a very festive Rockin’ 4 Heroes event in November.

All in all... It was a busy year in Oro Valley.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Running For Office? Your candidate packet awaits 

Oro Valley residents thinking about running for mayor or Town Council in 2026 can now pick up a Candidate Handbook from the Town Clerk’s Office at Town Hall, 11000 N. La Cañada Drive. Appointments can be made by emailing Mike Standish at mstandish@orovalleyaz.gov or calling 520-229-4700. Three council seats and the mayor’s seat are on the ballot. Candidates must be at least 18 years old, qualified to vote, and have lived in Oro Valley for at least one year before the election. Nomination papers can be filed March 9 – April 6, 2026, with between 525 and 1,050 signatures required. The Primary Election is August 4, 2026, and newly elected officials are expected to be sworn in shortly after the General Election on November 3, 2026. (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

Council to seek public input on proposed new taxes

By a 4–3 vote, the Oro Valley Town Council agreed Wednesday night to post notice of intent to adopt three taxes: A phased-in Commercial Rental Tax; a Telecommunications Tax; and a Use Tax. This step begins a state-required 60-day public notice and comment period, ending with a potential Council vote on January 14, 2026 to approve or reject any of the taxes. If enacted as proposed, Oro Valley’s 0% commercial rental tax would phase up to 2.5% over three years, the telecommunications tax would increase from 0% to 2.5%, and a new 2.5% use tax would be added to align with neighboring jurisdictions like Tucson and Marana. Councilmembers Barrett, Murphy, and Nicholson opposed moving forward, citing concerns over timing, business impacts, and the need for more cost-saving reviews of town operations. Staff will post a public notice of these proposed taxes on the town website on November 15. The council will make a decision on each of the three taxes at it's January 14 meeting. 

Where there is a will, there is a way

At Wednesday’s Council meeting, several residents expressed concern about the new no parking signs installed along Calle Buena Vista and parts of Calle Concordia. She said her household was not notified about the change and has seen no parking issues near their home in the past four and a half years. While she supports signage near OVCN to address overflow parking, she believes the signs further south are unnecessary, unsightly, and out of character with the neighborhood. Despite all the signage, which she described as an eyesore, we noted that church attendees were still parking on Calle Buena Vista this past Sunday [see panel right]. 

As written: New Use Tax would legally apply to individuals as well as businesses

If adopted, residents have been told by town staff that Oro Valley’s proposed use tax would apply mainly to businesses and not to residents. Businesses would be required to report out-of-state purchases where no local sales tax was paid. These are captured on regular tax filings submitted through the Arizona Department of Revenue, which may also conduct audits to ensure compliance. Town staff has repeatedly stated that the use tax would not be enforced on individual residents, and there are no plans to audit personal purchases. However, as technology advances, future governments may find it easier to track and enforce such taxes more broadly; though doing so would likely raise questions about privacy and require higher-level policy changes.

Film producer urges creation of Oro Valley film commission

Hollywood film producer Mark Headley spoke during Call to Audience segment of Wednesday's council meeting. He talked about the economic benefits of attracting movie production to the town. Drawing on his years of experience in the industry and Arizona’s past success as a filming location, he recommended the creation of a local film commission. Headley said such a commission could be inexpensive to set up and would complement efforts by the Arizona Film Office. He added that film productions typically leave about one-third of their budgets in the communities where they shoot.  Locally, both the Tucson and Marana film commissions. Film Tucson reported last year that filmmaking in the Tucson region generates between $9 million and $12 million annually in economic impact (hotels, restaurants, crews).

Council approves funds for police headquarters purchase and repairs

Wednesday, the Oro Valley Town Council unanimously approved reallocating $5.45 million from the Capital Fund contingency to cover the purchase and immediate repairs of the new police administration facility at 13101 N. Oracle Road. The purchase, completed for about $3.8 million, will be followed by an estimated $1.65 million in improvements, including HVAC replacement, roofing, stucco and parapet repair, and termite treatment. Vice Mayor Barrett noted she would have preferred some of the funding to be addressed during the next budget cycle but acknowledged the allocation was necessary. The motion passed 7–0, ensuring the building can be secured and preparations begun for future police operations.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Council approves plan to recruit new Town Attorney

Wednesday night's meeting, the Oro Valley Town Council approved the process for recruiting a new in-house Town Attorney. Human Resources Director Andy Votava outlined a plan modeled after the one used earlier this year to hire the Town Magistrate — posting the position quickly, advertising statewide, and having Council make the final hiring decision. Council members agreed the process should move forward without delay, citing the recent retirements of Legal Services Director Tobin Sidles and Chief Civil Deputy Joe Andrews. Staff was instructed to post the position immediately and return to Council with progress updates as the search advances. (See our previous report on this form more information)

Council approves Parks and Recreation fee increases; begins process to increase stormwater rate 

At Wednesday night’s meeting, the Oro Valley Town Council approved an update to the Parks and Recreation fee schedule and authorized a Notice of Intent to consider future changes to the stormwater utility base rate. The Parks and Recreation action updates fees for facility rentals, programs, and memberships beginning in January 2026. The stormwater item does not raise rates now but begins the required public process to review a possible increase from the current $4.50 monthly fee per household. The Council will hold a public hearing on January 14, 2026, before deciding whether to adopt the proposed stormwater rate changes.

Northbound lane closures on Oracle Road begin Monday 

The Town of Oro Valley’s Street Operations team will close portions of the northbound inside lane on Oracle Road from just south of Suffolk Drive to north of Big Wash Overlook Place between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. daily, Oct. 20–24, with possible extension through Oct. 29. Crews will perform biannual median maintenance, including tree trimming, weed control, and trash removal. Traffic control and signage will guide motorists, and all lanes will reopen outside work hours. The Town maintains the medians under a longstanding agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation. (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

Oro Valley's “mystery water line” project on State Lands

At Wednesday's Oro Valley Town Council meeting, Dan Scott, who lives in the Tortolita neighborhood just outside town limits near Tangerine and Thornydale, told the Council that heavy construction equipment had damaged his property from workers claimed to be installing a water line for Oro Valley. The water line is going into the state lands that were later discussed in the meeting. Scott said crews from contractor K.E.&G. entered the area about two weeks earlier, blading a wide path across State Trust land between Thornydale and Shannon Road and removing vegetation without any prior notice to nearby residents. He said neither he nor his neighbors had been informed of the project and asked the Town to explain what was happening. After his comments, no clarification was provided about the purpose or authorization of the work. However, we did see town Water Director Peter Abraham quickly moving to talk to Scott. Wonder what he said? We suspect that the water line is part of the NWRRDS project.  More to follow....

The no parking signs are mostly up

In early September we reported that the Town Council established no-street-parking zones on two major streets where the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene is located. This week, we noticed that “No Parking” signs have been installed along Concordia and the southern portion of Buena Vista. Signs have not yet been placed on Buena Vista north of Concordia. The signs are small—but there are many of them [see panel right]. If you are a member of OVCN, please park in the church parking lot. We’ve been told there is sufficient parking for all parishioners, with overflow parking available at CDO. Street parking during church hours has been a long-standing concern for nearby residents. We don’t yet know when the remaining signs will be installed.

Chamber uses Gen-Zers to push for more apartments in Oro Valley

The push for higher-density housing seems to have become a mission for the Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce. Earlier this year, the Chamber’s Gen Z Committee met with young professionals who concluded that the Town’s housing policies make it difficult for them to live where they work. The group sent letters to Town officials urging more apartments, townhomes, and mixed-use developments, and their views were featured in an article titled “Gen Z Seeks Housing Focus.”  Wednesday night, several supporters, one who works for the Chamber and leader of the Gen Z group, appeared before the Town Council again, repeating those same arguments and asking that Oro Valley’s draft general plan be changed to remove what they called “bias” against apartments and high-density housing. 

Town accepts Sierra Wash easement but avoids responsibility for broader maintenance

The Town Council approved an easement from the Canada Ridge Homeowners Association allowing the Town to access and maintain recently constructed drainage improvements at the Sierra Wash crossing under Naranja Drive. Staff said the action was necessary to protect the public roadway and underground utilities from erosion caused by storm runoff. Town officials made clear that the Town’s maintenance obligations apply only to the newly installed protective armoring around the culvert—not to the natural wash itself. Several council members noted that other HOAs must continue maintaining their own washes and that the Town would not assume those responsibilities unless a wash directly affects public infrastructure. (Source: The Oro Valley Town Council Meeting, October 15, 2025)

- - -

Town Council Ends OVCN member parking on Buena Vista and Concordia ROW

Council takes long-awaited action
Last week, the Oro Valley Town Council voted unanimously to ban parking on the right of way along Calle Buena Vista from Hardy Road and to extend no parking on Calle Concordia to Calle El Milagro [See panel below-right]. This is the area where the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) is located.

Residents raise safety concerns
The situation has existed for years, with residents’ pleas for relief largely ignored until now.  Residents speaking at the Council meeting described hazards created by street parking. Karen Steinbrun said the street is heavily used by “bicyclists and also people riding horses,” adding that “I think it is a safety issue because it’s an area for walking.” Longtime resident Tricia Tozer recalled a near accident during a church event: “They were parked the entire length of Buena Vista… a man and his child darted out between a truck… if I hadn’t been going five miles an hour, what would have happened?” David Diver, who lives across from OVCN, called it “like the great escape when the church lets out… everybody peels out of there because they can’t wait to get away and that makes it even more dangerous”.

Keesler: Street parking is about convenience, not necessity
Town Engineer Paul Keesler explained that OVCN has adequate on-site parking and an agreement with CDO High School for overflow. He said the issue is convenience: “It’s more… a matter of parking out there so they can get out quicker”.

Council weighs scope of restrictions
Vice Mayor Barrett moved to extend no-parking restrictions along Calle Buena Vista from Linda Vista to Hardy Road, and along Calle Concordia to El Milagro. She said intersections make clearer boundaries than “some random place where you’re going, ‘Can I park here? I don’t know’.”

Considered impact on adjacent neighborhoods
Councilmember Murphy supported the action but cautioned against shifting the problem: “I don’t want to solve this safety issue only to push it further out and create a safety issue in adjacent neighborhoods.” Keesler acknowledged the risk: “If you blocked off all of the streets, I would imagine you’re gonna push it into Shadow Mountain Estates. So you will be pushing, you will be moving that around a little bit”. Mayor Winfield added that he would speak with OVCN’s pastor about encouraging attendees not to park on neighborhood streets.
Council decision
The Council approved the motion unanimously, 7–0, to extend no-parking zones along both Calle Buena Vista and Calle Concordia. The action aims to improve access and visibility for neighbors, cyclists, and drivers, while OVCN retains on-site and overflow parking options.

Bits and Pieces

Council meeting action on OVCN new sanctuary height likely violated the Open Meeting Law

The April 16, 2025 Council agenda improperly combined a motion to reconsider with a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on the underlying item—the appeal of the Church of the Nazarene’s requested building height. Under Robert’s Rules of Order, which the Council follows, a motion to reconsider is a procedural vote that must occur separately from any debate or action on the substance of the item. While Robert’s Rules does not require that the subsequent hearing be held at a future meeting, it does require that the procedural vote and the item discussion be clearly distinct. This did not happen at the meeting.

In public bodies like Oro Valley, Arizona’s Open Meeting Law adds an additional requirement: agendas must clearly and specifically notify the public of what will be discussed and acted upon. By listing all steps—reconsideration, public hearing, and action—within a single agenda item and moving forward with a final vote that same night, the Council failed to follow proper procedure and denied residents fair notice and opportunity to participate.

Town Manager’s Recommended Budget for fiscal year 2025/26 released

ORO VALLEY, Ariz. (April 30, 2025) – The Town of Oro Valley Town Manager’s Recommended Budget for fiscal year (FY) 2025/26 is now available online. Click here to view the full budget document.

 

The General Fund, the Town’s main operating fund, totals $53.9 million, reflecting a 1.5% increase from the prior fiscal year. The total budget across all funds—including highway, water, stormwater, parks and recreation, grants, debt service, and capital—is $147.1 million, a 2.5% decrease from FY 2024/25." (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

Register for the spring tour of historic homes
On May 10, the Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation will use the patio at the Pusch House Museum to register participants for their annual spring tour of historic homes, this time in Oracle. There are iconic homes on the self-guided tour, and the Pusch House is where everyone will start. Registration is from 9 a.m. to noon, and participants will be given wristbands, maps, and shoe covers. Learn more about this tour.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Council reaffirms OVCN 36-foot height approval

At this past Wednesday’s Town Council meeting, the Council voted to affirm its earlier decision to approve a 36-foot height for the future sanctuary planned by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene. The reconsideration was brought forward by Councilmembers Robb and Nicholson. After public comment and discussion, the Council ultimately chose not to change course. A full LOVE article analyzing the discussion and vote will follow soon.

HB 2447 limits public hearings in cases where applications meet codified, measurable standards

At this same meeting, former Council Member Solomon, speaking against reconsideration, said that a “new state law just passed which places limits on local elected officials’ reviews and approvals of development plans.” We believe the bill to which he is referring is Arizona House Bill 2447.  The bill was signed by the Governor on March 31, 2025. The bill requires that cities and towns adopt procedures for administrative (staff-level) review and approval of development and design applications using objective, measurable standards. This means that if a proposal meets those predefined standards, it can be approved without requiring a public hearing or discretionary vote by a board or commission. While the bill doesn’t explicitly prohibit public hearings, it shifts more decision-making authority to staff, thereby reducing opportunities for public input in cases that are deemed compliant with objective criteria. (Article on April 21, 2025).

LOVE reporting on the 2026 fiscal budget starts soon

The Town’s fiscal year 2026 budget process is in full swing. We expect the Town Manager to issue his recommended budget later this month. The Town Council will then hold a budget study session on April 30 at 6 p.m. in Town Council Chambers, followed by another session on May 5 at 6 p.m. These meetings are especially informative, as each department manager presents their budget along with an explanation of why their requests are justified. As we’ve done for many years, LOVE will provide detailed analysis as the budget process unfolds.

Highlights from the April town manager report

Each month, the town manager issues a report to Council. This month the report notes that the town continues to move forward on key infrastructure and community projects. The Magee Road improvement project is underway with nighttime work scheduled through mid-May. The Oro Valley Town Court renovation is nearing completion, with a secure prisoner transfer area up next. Pedestrian safety upgrades are also beginning this month in the Marketplace area as part of a prior rezoning condition. The town also saw a sharp increase in traffic enforcement. Officers made 7,144 more traffic stops in 2024 compared to the same period in 2023. This was described in the report as a “significant increase” and part of a department-wide effort to reduce injuries and property damage from collisions.

Recreation fee increases in process…possible implementation in the fall

Parks and Recreation staff presented proposed fee increases for various facilities to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board this past Tuesday. Most community center membership and facility rental fees—some unchanged since 2013—would rise under the plan. Resident and non-profit users would pay lower rates than non-residents and for-profits. Staff will hold a Zoom community meeting on July 9 to gather public feedback. No action can be taken until the Town Council approves the changes.

The Senate bill referenced during the reconsideration discussion was SB 1162. It was mentioned by Councilmember Nicholson as one of the reasons for bringing the item back for discussion. Nicholson explained that the bill could have implications for how height-related zoning decisions are reviewed or challenged in the future.

Parks and Recreation receives two grants

According to Town Manager Wilkins in his report to the council Wednesday the town's Parks and Recreation staff secured a $30,000 grant to assess the Proctor-Lieber House at Steam Pump Ranch and another grant from Arizona Game and Fish to support a new shade structure for the archery area at Naranja Park. 

10th annual ‘Roundup at the Ranch’ adds 10K distance and afterparty May 17

"Lace up your shoes and get ready to round up some fun! The Town of Oro Valley invites community members of all ages to participate in the 10th Annual Roundup at the Ranch 5K/10K Run/Walk on Saturday evening, May 17, 2025." (Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)

- - -

Bits and Pieces

Children’s Museum reports growth, outreach, and unique new exhibits 

At the April 2, 2025 Town Council meeting, Hillary Van Alsburg, Executive director of the Children’s Museum, delivered an update highlighting the museum’s continued growth and community outreach. She reported that over 31,000 people visited the museum at Tohono Chul in the past year, and nearly 3,000 attended the “Chillin at the Chul” program. Additional outreach brought activities to five Oro Valley parks, reaching nearly 200 children, and special events like “Hallow Halloween” and the Oro Valley 50th Anniversary Parade drew 1,800 participants. New educational features were introduced, including “Ready-Set-Explore” backpacks for garden exploration and monthly clay art sessions with professional artists. She also previewed upcoming additions such as an agriculture-themed play area, the La Comunidad pretend market space, and a new prickly pear exhibit—reportedly the only one of its kind in the world. Learn more about the Children’s Museum.

“Serving with Compassion—Not at the Expense of Neighbors”

Resident Vicki Tarris sent us thoughts regarding the OVCN proposed sanctuary height meeting. About fourteen church member spoke at the meeting.  

"I listened to the Town Council meeting on April 2, 2025. A lot of people from OVCN came to give testimonials on what OVCN means in their life.  I am really happy that so many people have found OVCN to meet their spiritual needs.

 

However, they implied that OVCN was the only church in town that offers children’s programs and helps the needy.

 

I am happy to say that I get a great deal of spiritual comfort from my own church.  We also have a very active children's program. We also feed the homeless. We also help the poor. We also have numerous ways that people can become involved.

 

However, the one way that my church differs from OVCN is that my church does not deliberately harm their neighbors!"

Solomon urged unity—if you agree with OVCN

Former town council member Steve Solomon spoke passionately in support of OVCN during the April 2 meeting. He described the church as “amazing” and shared how it had positively transformed his life. He expressed admiration for the church’s outreach and missions—specifically mentioning a woman he met at work who was going to Guatemala to teach women how to sew. Solomon emphasized the importance of kindness and community, saying, “We just need to love each other and be kind and get along.” 

- - -

Five Oddities

Five oddities
Yesterday we reported our fact-based analysis of the decision by the Town Council to overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the height permitted for the new Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) sanctuary. As we reported, the Council approved a 36-foot height. But what we didn’t report were the oddities we observed during that meeting. There were many—but here are our top five:

Council ignores four years of input from residents
The residents most directly impacted by the decision have been attending Council meetings and speaking during the “Call to Audience” portion for the past four years. They have consistently voiced concerns about the church's expansion. None of this was acknowledged by the Council during last week’s discussion. Instead, Mayor Winfield referred to an impromptu “survey” based on emails he received just days before the meeting, regarding the church’s request for a continuance. He reported that 10 of the 13 emails he received supported granting the continuance. He gave full weight to these last-minute emails rather than four years of sustained public comment. The rest of the Council went along with it.

What happened during the five-minute timeout, and why did Barrett change her mind?
After spending considerable time making an impassioned plea for a 29-foot height limit, Vice Mayor Barrett asked for a five-minute recess to reconsider. Her words were: “Can I ask for us to take a five-minute break? I just—I really want to think for a minute.” Some have speculated that she may have been influenced during that break by one or more Council members, but there is no evidence of that, and such speculation is not helpful without proof. Still, taking a break to reflect isn’t wrong—but it does invite speculation when a clear change in position follows so closely afterward.

The "Clifton Matter:" Why was it brought up at the same time?
It seemed odd that the Clifton matter was discussed during the executive session just before the public discussion of the OVCN height appeal. The Clifton case involves a court ruling against the Town, where the court found that a town body—specifically the Board of Adjustment—erred in a height-related decision. The Town not only lost the case but was ordered to pay Clifton's legal fees and costs of about $19,000. Immediately after the executive session, the Council voted to appeal the Planning and Zoning Commission OVCN height ruling. It’s hard to ignore the timing: A height-related legal loss followed by a sensitive height decision in public session. It makes one wonder whether town attorneys were subtly signaling the Council to avoid a possible courtroom setback. If so, the Council followed that signal precisely.

Robb voted "Yes”
Councilmember Robb lives directly across from the church property and is personally affected by the decision. Rather than standing with the Concordia-Buena Vista group, which opposed the height increase, she voted in favor of it. Her decision was in sharp contrast to Councilmember Greene, an OVCN member, who celebrated openly after the vote. Perhaps Robb believed the outcome was inevitable and decided to go along with it. But as the saying goes: "Never go along just to get along."

OVCN snatches victory from the jaws of defeat
OVCN came to the meeting hoping for a continuance, fearing the Council might reject their height request. Instead, by the end of the night, they got everything they wanted—approval for the full 36 feet. The residents, meanwhile, got nothing. In fact, their concerns weren’t even a factor in the Council’s discussion. Not once did anyone on the dais speak to the repeated objections and long-standing input from affected neighbors.

Yes, it was a strange night, indeed.
- - -

OVCN Gets 36-Foot Height Approval as Council Sidesteps Conflict, Overrides Commission

Town Council approved 36-foot height for new OVCN sanctuary
After a two-and-a-half-hour discussion last Wednesday, the Oro Valley Town Council approved a maximum height of 36 feet for a new sanctuary building planned by the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN). In doing so, the Council overruled the Planning and Zoning Commission’s earlier decision, which had limited the building height to 24 feet. For comparison, the church’s existing sanctuary stands at 29 feet.

But not without "drama"
As previously reported, OVCN had requested an eight-month continuance to submit a more complete set of conceptual plans. Church representatives argued that pairing the height request with a full development plan would give the Council and the public more context—particularly regarding traffic, parking, drainage, and landscaping.

However, as Vice Mayor Melanie Barrett noted during the discussion, the Town already had sufficient information to decide the height question. “We know what the height is. We have the plans. We are not lacking information to make a decision on height,” she said, adding that the site’s context and the Planning and Zoning Commission’s findings gave the Council what it needed to act now.

After denying a continuance ...
After hearing 16 public comments—both for and against the continuance—the Council narrowly voted 4–3 to deny the delay. The motion to continue was made by Mayor Joe Winfield, who believed the additional time and planning detail would help the Council reach a better decision. Barrett’s position prevailed, and she was joined by Councilmembers Nicholson, Robb, and Jones-Ivey in voting no.

…Attention turned to the height request
With the continuance denied, the Council turned its attention to the appeal itself—specifically, whether to uphold or overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of the height exception. The Council chose not to deliberate on whether the Commission had erred. Instead, they bypassed that issue and directly overruled the decision, granting a modified height exception.

Barrett proposed a 29-foot option
During that discussion, Vice Mayor Barrett proposed limiting the height to 29 feet—the same as the existing sanctuary. She noted that this would have been consistent with what the church had previously offered earlier in the process. Given our understanding of the situation, we have little doubt that had she remained firm, that suggestion would have passed.

But then, late in the game, Barrett took a huge “leap of faith”
However, Barrett later withdrew that suggestion and agreed to support the 36-foot height limit—but only on the condition that OVCN make a genuine effort to work with nearby residents to address their concerns. She emphasized that while she supported the increased height in this case, it came with the expectation that the church would actively engage the community and demonstrate responsiveness going forward.

“If the Town Council grants the 36 feet, you will still go through a development plan review process and work with neighbors and address any traffic concerns such as potential road widening, parking issues, etc., correct?” she asked. OVCN’s representative responded that they would be happy to do so.

However, according to individuals who oppose the height request, OVCN’s history of working with neighbors over the past four years has been anything but forthright.

Council approved 36' height
The final motion, which passed unanimously, stated:

“I move to overrule the Planning and Zoning Commission denial of the building height increase request and conditionally grant a building height increase of 36 feet maximum, including conditions one, two, and four.”

These conditions require that the new building not exceed 36 feet in height as shown in the submitted plans, that a future development plan must align with this height approval, and that the height limit excludes rooftop features like parapets or mechanical screens.

Much to the joy of Councilmember Greene who, despite clear ethicL conflict, voted and then celebrated OVCN victory
Councilmember Mo Greene is a member of OVCN. Despite this clear ethical conflict of interest, Greene did not recuse himself from the vote, nor did any councilmember raise the issue. Instead, Green voted in favor of the church’s request and, when the motion passed, applauded and raised his hand in celebration toward the audience. His reaction is captured in the panel at left.

Fortunately, Barrett spared the Planning and Zoning Commission from rehashing a height request it already rejected
The next step is for the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene to submit a development plan. That plan will first be reviewed by Town staff, then by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and finally by the Town Council.

Vice Mayor Barrett’s insistence on deciding the height now—rather than postponing the matter—ensured that the final decision rested with the Council, not the Commission, which had already reviewed and rejected the height request earlier this year.

Residents will have additional opportunities to participate during the upcoming development plan process.
- - -

OVCN’s Campus Expansion Efforts Marked By Delays and Strategy Shifts

Tonite’s council meeting may bring another delay
Tonite, the Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to grant the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene yet another postponement. This one is a delay of a possible council decision to overturn the Planning and Zoning Commission's recent denial of a height request for a new building. Postponements are the hallmark of OVCN. They seem to request one every time things are not going well for them.

Four years of delay and suspense
That is the history based on our review of their efforts to enlarge their current location over the past four years. The Town has granted a number of postponements to give OVCN more time to pursue its objective to somehow and in some way enlarge its facility—and at the same time extend the suspense for the many residents who oppose their efforts.

Initial proposal aimed to build a full sports complex
In early 2022, OVCN submitted a rezoning request to transform its campus with the addition of a sports complex. The initial plan included a full-sized football/soccer field and other athletic facilities. The proposal quickly drew opposition from nearby residents, who cited traffic, lighting, noise, and loss of neighborhood character as major concerns. Fourteen neighbors submitted a formal opposition letter to the Town on March 1, 2022.

First postponement: no Planning & Zoning hearing in 2022
Despite these concerns, the application moved forward. A Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) hearing was originally expected in 2022, but OVCN requested a delay. Town staff announced that the hearing would not occur before January 2023. This marked the first of multiple postponements that would stretch the process out for years.

Resident frustrations grew as proposal remained active
In October 2022, the Town facilitated a meeting between OVCN and affected neighbors. Residents reiterated their opposition to any version of the project. They pointed out that OVCN had previously removed trees and gates that were part of its original development agreement—actions that contributed to distrust. Some residents also noted that town staff appeared to be working with OVCN to “find a compromise,” even contacting neighbors directly after the meeting to negotiate support. These efforts were unsuccessful.

Second postponement: OVCN delays again in 2023
By early 2023, OVCN had not withdrawn the rezoning application but again postponed its progress. Town staff indicated in February 2023 that OVCN had requested more time. The item was not scheduled for the March or April agendas. Over the next few months, the proposal remained on hold, with no public movement.

Third postponement: still no hearing by late 2023
As of late 2023, the application remained pending with no scheduled PZC hearing. In October, Town staff again confirmed that the delay was at OVCN’s request. Residents expressed frustration with the lack of transparency, noting that the church continued to revise its plans behind closed doors. The rezoning request still had not been withdrawn. It is today laying nascent in the queue.

New proposal avoids rezoning, raises new concerns
In 2024, OVCN changed its approach. Rather than pursuing rezoning for a sports complex, it introduced a plan to build a 40-foot-tall sanctuary, a student center, a maintenance building, and over 800 paved parking spaces. These were all permitted under existing zoning, with the exception of the sanctuary height, which would require a variance. Town staff confirmed the height request would be reviewed by the Board of Adjustment. Meanwhile, the original rezoning request stayed “on hold.”

Neighbors fear sports complex is still the goal
Residents questioned whether the sanctuary might eventually become an indoor sports facility—especially since the original request included such a structure. Concerns also included additional traffic, parking congestion, and the size of the project. In August 2024, neighbors attended a meeting with OVCN but left disappointed. The church presented no specific site plan and asked for general feedback, saying final decisions had not been made.

Questionable outreach efforts and neighbor response
Following that August 2024 meeting, OVCN sent a form letter to neighbors suggesting it had not heard back from them—despite their attendance at the meeting. Residents saw this as a misleading outreach effort. Longtime neighbor Tricia Tozier stated publicly that she felt OVCN had no real intention of listening. The meeting did little to reduce neighborhood opposition.

Another postponement
The Planning and Zoning Commission rejected the OVCN request for a height variance in January. OVCN appealed that decision to the Town Council. When the hearing came up in late January, OVCN asked for yet another postponement—this time because they had hired new legal counsel. The hearing was rescheduled for tonight.

And a request for yet another postponement to be heard tonight
Then, several weeks ago, OVCN asked for a postponement of this hearing. It doesn’t matter why. We have reported why. It doesn’t matter why they want it. It matters that they want it. Our surmise is that they want more time to work the system, to work the neighbors, and to build a legal basis for a possible future legal challenge.

Tonight the council can say "No"

- - -

Want to learn more? Read our years long coverage.

Bits and Pieces

Ventana Medical Systems wants permission to release pollutants into Oro Valley’s air
Oro Valley’s Ventana Medical Systems (also known as Roche Tissue Diagnostics), located in Innovation Park Drive has applied for a permit to release air pollutants from its operations. These include five different pollutant plus one called "Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)".  The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) is processin the request. It is accepting public comments on it through April 21, 2025. You can also request a public hearing. Visit pima.gov to submit a comment or request a hearing.

Tech support scams on the rise

The March 2025 edition of the Oro Valley Police Department’s (OVPD) Crimefighter Newsletter warns residents about an increase in tech support scams, with older adults being frequent targets. These scams often begin with pop-up messages or unsolicited calls from people pretending to be technicians from well-known companies. Victims are tricked into giving remote access to their computers or purchasing unnecessary software, putting their finances and personal information at risk. OVPD encourages residents to stay vigilant and provides tips on how to protect themselves.

OVPD offers community safety programs

The newsletter also announces the return of the R.A.D. (Rape Aggression Defense) Self-Defense Program, offering practical techniques for personal protection. In addition, OVPD has launched the OV Safe Return Program to help locate and safely return individuals who may wander due to cognitive conditions. These programs reflect the department’s continued commitment to community safety and proactive support for residents.

OVCN seeks yet another "extension"...Residents Opposed

The saga of the Oro Valley Church (OVCN) of the Nazarene’s effort to build major new facilities has dragged on for six years. What started as a plan for a sports complex shifted to a proposal for a 40-foot-tall sanctuary with support facilities. The Planning and Zoning Commission rejected that height request in January, and the church appealed to the Town Council. At the schedule hearing, OVCN asked for more time after hiring a new attorney. The Council granted an extension until April 2.

Now, the church is asking for an eight-month delay. In their letter to the Council, they explain that most concerns raised by neighbors involve traffic, parking, and drainage — issues not fully addressed in their current request. They say they need more time to complete a full analysis of these concerns and submit formal plans through the town’s Development Plan process. It’s yet another delay in a process that seems unlikely to end anytime soon.

And here’s the kicker: Any development plan must first go through town staff review, then a public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission, and only then can it go before the Town Council. That process takes time — probably more than eight months.

Four speakers addressed the council on Wednesday, all opposing the request by OVCN for an additional eight-month extension. They expressed frustration over years of delays and emphasized that the project has already been rejected twice by the Planning and Zoning Commission for being incompatible with the neighborhood.  They argued that repeated continuances only prolong uncertainty and allow the church to bypass established zoning decisions. They urged the council to deny the extension and called for the church to find a more appropriate location for its expansion plans.

The Town Council does not have to grant the extension. Let’s see what they do on April 2 when they consider it.

Harebrained Arizona House bill would allow religious institutions to build housing with little local input

The Arizona House is considering HB2191, a bill that would allow religious institutions to build residential developments on land they own. While local governments would still handle administrative approvals, they would not be allowed to impose additional conditions or hold public hearings. Issues like traffic, parking, drainage, and community impact would be addressed only through minimal state-mandated standards, not through local decision-making. Residents would lose their voice in the process, and town councils would have little power to influence what happens in their own communities.

The RoadRunners celebrated Oro Valley 

The Tucson Roadrunners, the American Hockey League affiliate of the NHL's Utah Hockey Club, celebrated Oro Valley this past Sunday. According to Council Member Mo Greene: “Sunday was a really cool day for Oro Valley. The Roadrunners hosted a day for Oro Valley, and we had the town manager riding around on the Zamboni — a priceless picture — and he did well! He stayed right on there. Then the mayor dropped the puck to start the game. It was an amazing day, and after two overtimes, the Roadrunners won. It was a really exciting day.”

- - -

Bits and Pieces

OVCN uses added time to try to strengthen their case

A reader wrote to us expressing concern over the Town Council’s decision last week to grant the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) an additional six weeks to present their appeal on the Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision to deny a height increase for a new sanctuary. The added time, the reader noted, allows OVCN time to strengthen their case. The reader pointed out that Paul Oland of Paradigm Land Design, working for OVCN, submitted two requests for information to the town just days later. Both requests seek information on prior building height approvals for similar facilities. The reader questioned why such information was not requested long ago.

March brings outdoor fun and family activities to Oro Valley 

The Oro Valley Parks & Recreation newsletter highlights an exciting lineup of March events for residents of all ages. Outdoor enthusiasts can join the Oro Valley Hiking Series on March 1 at Dead Horse Canyon, offering a guided trek through an “unmapped” trail. Music lovers can enjoy a Friday Night Concert at Steam Pump Ranch on March 7, featuring a live performance by the Vindaloo Band. Families can look forward to Second Saturday at Steam Pump Ranch on March 8, complete with historical tours, live music, and a farmers’ market. Later in the month, Movie at the Ranch on March 15 will screen Inside Out 2 under the stars, while Family Camping at the Ranch on March 29-30 provides an opportunity to experience an overnight campout, complete with s’mores and a pancake breakfast. With spring break camps and fitness programs also on the schedule, March is shaping up to be an active and engaging month in Oro Valley.

Text message scam targeting drivers

The February 2025 CrimeFighter Newsletter highlights a new text message scam targeting drivers by falsely claiming they owe unpaid toll road fees. Scammers send messages pretending to be from FasTrak, an electronic toll collection system, and include a link to a fake payment website. The fraudulent messages often create urgency by threatening penalties for non-payment, tricking recipients into providing sensitive financial information. The newsletter warns that a key red flag is the sender’s phone number, which typically originates from the Philippines (+63 country code). FasTrak officials emphasize that they never send text messages demanding payment from non-account holders. Residents are advised to avoid clicking on any links and instead verify toll charges directly through the official FasTrak website.

Ashley Furniture owner Sam levitz faces lawsuit over unpaid rent and customer grievances

In December 2024, the landlords of the Sam Levitz Furniture owned Ashley Furniture, formerly located in the Oro Valley Marketplace, filed a lawsuit in December alleging that the company breached its lease by closing its Oro Valley Ashley Furniture store without notice and failing to pay nearly $60,000 in monthly rent. The lease was intended to run through June 2036. Concurrently, customers have reported unresolved issues, including undelivered furniture and unaddressed warranty claims, with some expressing frustration over the company’s lack of communication since its closure. (Source 1). 

(Source 2)

Here's why we always question the reliability of national rankings about Oro Valley

We are always wary of data provided by national companies ranking Oro Valley in any survey. These rankings are often promotional articles with little data reliability. One example is moveBuddha’s recent ranking of Oro Valley’s moving trends, which reported only 49 moves into the town and a move-in to move-out ratio of 0.49 in 2024. If moveBuddha’s data were the only source considered, this ratio would suggest that more people are leaving Oro Valley than moving in, implying a declining population. This, of course, is not the case, as Oro Valley’s population is growing. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Oro Valley’s population increased from 47,070 in 2020 to an estimated 48,226 in 2022, indicating an average annual growth rate of approximately 0.6%. This suggests a net increase of about 1,156 residents over two years, or roughly 578 people per year. This figure represents net population growth, accounting for both people moving in and out of Oro Valley, as well as natural changes such as births and deaths.

More On Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s Building Height Variance Hearing Continuation

April 2 is new hearing date
The Oro Valley Town Council voted unanimously to continue the hearing on the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s (OVCN) height variance request for six weeks, moving it to April 2. The hearing is an appeal of an OVCN request to have a 40 height limit on a planned new sanctuary.  (Read this article to learn more about what is at stake)

The continuance decision followed a request from John Gillespie, an attorney with the Rose Law Group, who was recently retained by the church. Mayor Joe Winfield explained that he received the request via email on the day prior and acknowledged it promptly. The council’s decision allows OVCN’s new legal representation time to familiarize themselves with the case and prepare their arguments.

OVCN legal representative emphasizes collaboration and understanding
During the meeting, Gillespie emphasized that the Rose Law Group specializes in land-use cases and is committed to working with both the town and local residents to find a well-informed resolution. He is also stated that "We were just engaged this past week. We focused on land-use issues. We're not a litigation firm."

Gillespie initially requested a 30-day continuance, but Mayor Winfield proposed extending the delay to six weeks to ensure full council participation. The revised timeline avoids a conflict with the March 19 meeting, which falls during the town’s spring break and could result in some council members being absent. The motion for the six-week continuance was seconded by Councilmember Greene and passed without opposition.

Council urges church to engage with neighbors in preparing for April 2 hearing
Councilmember Robb took the opportunity to stress the importance of community engagement during the extended review period. She specifically asked that the church and its representatives consult with nearby residents and other interested parties, rather than limiting discussions to town officials. Gillespie agreed, stating, "The church understands that they need to be a development partner and that any use of their land requires collaboration with the town and neighbors.” He added that his firm’s goal is to "help facilitate a good, informed outcome that benefits all parties involved.”

Winfield reinforces commitment to due process
Mayor Winfield reiterated that granting the continuance does not indicate a predetermined outcome. He explained that while the Planning and Zoning Commission previously denied the height variance request for a 40-foot structure, it is essential that the town follows a fair and transparent process. "By granting this continuance, we remove any potential concerns about the applicant’s right to due process, which strengthens the legitimacy of whatever decision we ultimately make,”  Winfield said. He also assured residents that the council will weigh the request carefully, balancing property rights with neighborhood concerns.

Residents encouraged to return for April 2 hearing
The decision to continue the hearing disappointed a room full of those who had attended the meeting expecting a final decision. Many were prepared to address council during the hearing. However, Mayor Winfield stated that moving forward with discussions without knowing the church’s revised position would not be productive. He asked for patience from both supporters and opponents, encouraging them to return on April 2 when the town will conduct a full review of the request.

- - -

Bits and Pieces

OVCN building height hearing continued
The Town Council hearing room was packed with those for and against the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene’s (OVCN) request to build a 40-foot sanctuary. As we reported yesterday, many attendees were likely disappointed to learn that the hearing was continued until April 2. The continuation was requested by John Gillespie of Rose Law Group, who is now representing OVCN. This marks yet another delay in the church’s plans for the property.

Rancho Vistoso residents need vote on street parking enforcement
A new Arizona law may limit the Vistoso Community Association’s ability to enforce street parking rules, but a community-wide vote could allow enforcement to continue. If the association loses this authority, it could lead to safety concerns such as blocked views for drivers and pedestrians, restricted access for emergency vehicles, and reduced property values due to unsightly parked vehicles. Residents are urged to participate in the upcoming vote before the annual meeting on March 27, 2025, to help maintain the community’s safety and aesthetics. (Source: VCA Newsletter – January 2025)

Tucson Bicycle Classic returns to Oro Valley Sunday—expect traffic delays
The Tucson Bicycle Classic returns to Oro Valley on Sunday, bringing more than 600 professional cyclists to Naranja Park for the final stage of the three-day race. The Oro Valley Circuit Race, featuring a new 2.8-mile course and a challenging uphill finish on Musette Drive, is expected to generate over $180,000 in economic impact. Spectators can enjoy prime viewing spots inside Naranja Park, with food trucks and vendors available.

To ensure safety, road closures and traffic restrictions will be in place from 3 a.m. to 7 p.m. on race day. Naranja Drive (between Monterra Vista Dr. and Musette Rd.) will be closed, along with several surrounding roads. Motorists should expect delays and plan alternate routes. Free spectator parking will be available at the Oro Valley Public Library and Town Hall. For a full list of closures and detours, visit [event website].

Oro Valley’s latest project updates
Ongoing projects include accessibility enhancements at the Community & Recreation Center, safety improvements near Leman Academy, and drainage upgrades at Naranja Park. The Town is also advancing efforts to enhance public spaces, with upcoming Resident Working Groups set to help shape Oro Valley’s next 10-year plan. These projects aim to improve infrastructure, safety, and community engagement. (Source: Oro Valley Vista)

- - -

Oro Valley Town Council to Hear OVCN Appeal

Oro Valley town council to decide on OVCN appeal
The Oro Valley Town Council will decide whether to uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission's January decision denying the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene (OVCN) permission to build a new sanctuary with a height of 40 feet. The current allowable height on the property is 24 feet, but the town has the authority to grant a higher limit.

OVCN claims unfair standards and disregard for evidence
OVCN is appealing the decision, arguing that it is unjust and unfair. They claim the Commission disregarded substantial evidence supporting their proposal, applied inconsistent standards, and failed to consider the broader community benefits. As an example, they argue that the Commission unfairly scrutinized the volume of activities and attendance at their facility compared to similar projects.

Town staff’s response: Height request tied to safety and seating capacity
Town staff responded to some of these assertions. In their meeting notice to the council, they state that the proposed sanctuary height increase is directly tied to accommodating auditorium-style seating for over 1,500 people. They cite International Building Code requirements, which mandate specific roof heights for safety and sightlines. Staff also note that increased seating capacity affects parking and traffic considerations.

Significant Community opposition
Community members oppose the height request. In just one week, more than 600 residents have signed a petition urging the town to deny the appeal.

Three resolution options...but there could be more
Town staff has proposed three resolution options for the council’s consideration:

• Uphold the Planning and Zoning Commission’s denial of OVCN’s height increase request.
• Overrule the denial with conditions, allowing a maximum height of 29 feet plus an additional 5 feet for parapet screening, but only in areas necessary to fully screen mechanical equipment, as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator.
• Overrule the denial and fully approve the height increase request, subject to conditions outlined in the staff report, including landscape buffers and positioning requirements to minimize visual impact.

Uncertainty over the 29-foot option
The inclusion of the 29-foot option is unclear, as OVCN withdrew it from consideration. Initially, OVCN proposed a 29-foot height, assuming part of the sanctuary would be built underground, but they rescinded this request a week later. It is unknown whether the council will discuss this or other height options at tonight’s meeting. The council has the authority to modify these options or propose its own. For example, they may consider continuing the item for further discussion or negotiation.

Next steps for OVCN
If the council does not approve the 40-foot height, OVCN has two alternatives. They can either build the sanctuary within the existing 24-foot height limit or pursue legal action, potentially including a federal court challenge, if they believe their rights under federal law, such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA-See Below), have been violated. 

Stay tuned for updates on this decision.

- - -
RLUIPA protects religious institutions from discriminatory land use regulations by requiring governments to apply the same standards as they do for non-religious entities and to justify any substantial burden with a compelling interest pursued in the least restrictive way. Protecting the character and livability of a neighborhood, particularly regarding noise, traffic, public safety, or environmental impact, is a compelling government interest, as long as the government can demonstrate that the restriction is the least restrictive means of achieving that interest and is applied in a non-discriminatory manner.

Guest View-David Rishor: The "Oro Valley Motor Speedway"

Previously we wrote about the very unsafe Buena Vista & Concordia intersection. With 30 accidents in the last 10 years and increasing traffic from CDO High School and an upcoming OVCN expansion, this intersection poses unique challenges. 

What we did not relate at that time were some other serious traffic issues caused by this hard to navigate intersection. Resident David Rishor told us about some collateral damage caused by that mess.

- - -

"What was missing from discussions about traffic issues [at Concordia and Buena Vista] is the Overlook Drive shortcut—or as we neighbors call it, the Oro Valley Motor Speedway.

This route is often overlooked.. but not by the traffic heading to or from the Oro Valley Church of the Nazarene and CDO High School. Why? It’s simple. We all know about the congestion and dangerous conditions at W. Calle Concordia and N. Buena Vista. Since this intersection is a nightmare, what do drivers do? They cut south on Overlook Drive, turn west on Spring Valley Drive, and then jump onto southbound Buena Vista—TA-DA! An easy, breezy way to bypass the congestion.

And bypass it they do! Day after day, weekend after weekend, we witness cars flying through this 25 mph residential area at criminal-level speeds. It’s terrifying. You should see it—OMG! Why isn’t Oro Valley P.D. taking advantage of this? They’re never around. Why not?

The solution? Simple.

Speed humps. Not speed bumps that force drivers to crawl at 5 mph, but properly designed humps that are smooth at 25 mph yet unforgiving to speeders. Go too fast? BAM—you’ll feel it!

Something must be done. This issue is serious, and it needs to stay part of the traffic conversation!"

- - -

David...we definitely agree.