Friday, May 22, 2026
Bits and Pieces
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Planning and Zoning Commission Split Leaves Sun City Fountain Proposal Unresolved
No recommendation made after tie vote on water fountain
Last week, the Planning and Zoning Commission did not approve nor deny a text amendment to the Rancho Vistoso PAD that would have allowed an ornamental fountain to return to the Sun City Recreation Center. They did this through a split vote of 3-3 on a motion to deny the amendment, meaning no majority decision was reached.
Request made because fountain lost legal status to be restored without approval
The request is to allow restoration of the long-standing Lion Head Fountain. It was made by the Sun City Vistoso Community Association. The fountain was in operation until 2020. Unfortunately, it remained out of service for more than six months, causing it to lose its legal non-conforming status under Town code, which no longer permits ornamental fountains.
Staff says proposal conflicts with town water policies
Click To Enlarge
Town staff recommended denial of the request, stating it conflicts with the Town's General Plan policies on water conservation. Staff referenced both the current Your Voice, Our Future General Plan and the draft Path Forward General Plan, which emphasize responsible water use, conservation, and drought-tolerant development. The zoning code has prohibited ornamental fountains since 2011 as part of that policy direction. Staff said allowing a new or reactivated fountain, even a smaller one, would be inconsistent with those policies and with the Town's long-standing approach to limiting non-essential water use.
Public comment was mostly supportive
Public comment reflected strong interest, with most speakers supporting the proposal. Supporters described the fountain as a valued community feature that provided a gathering place and contributed to the character of Sun City. They also pointed to the redesign and reduced water use. Those opposed focused on water conservation concerns, noting ongoing drought conditions and questioning whether any non-essential water use is appropriate.
Commission divided on whether exception is justified
Commission discussion reflected the same divide. Some members supported the amendment, noting the relatively small amount of water involved and the effort to reduce usage. Others emphasized the need to follow the General Plan and avoid setting a precedent for exceptions to the code. Several commissioners acknowledged the strength of public opinion on both sides.
Town Council will make final decision
With the 3-3 vote, the Commission did not make a formal recommendation. Instead, the matter will move forward to Town Council with notice of the split vote. Council will make the final decision on whether to approve the text amendment.
- - -
Thursday, June 27, 2024
Mary Murphy’s Vision for Oro Valley: Ensuring Fiscal Sustainability
- - -
No property tax: Build revenues by working with local businesses
Tighten spending by prioritizing “Needs” and “Wants”
Murphy advocates for a balanced budget and a focus on prioritizing needs over wants to control spending. “By focusing on a balanced budget and prioritizing ‘needs’ over ‘wants’, we can control our spending,” she explains..
Maintain Oro Valley’s unique character-use land to the highest standards
Murphy stresses the importance of maintaining Oro Valley’s unique character by supporting only the highest standards for the limited remaining undeveloped land. Murphy has also made it clear that she has not accepted any developer or outside money, ensuring her decisions are made in the best interest of the community.
Look for annexations that “pay their own way”
Murphy emphasizes the importance of a rigorous cost-benefit analysis for annexations. “Any annexation must be considered on a rigorous cost-benefit basis. Only then can we make certain that any annexations enhance the quality, character, and financial health of the town.”
Engage the community in the journey
Transparency and collaboration are central to Mary Murphy’s vision for government. She plans to prioritize these values to ensure that residents can directly contact her. “Residents deserve representatives who will be easily approachable and available, and that is exactly what I plan to do,” she asserts. To achieve this, she plans to reintroduce “Council on Your Corner,” with monthly meetings around town, including in Sun City. Her initiative aims to give residents a direct voice in governance.
Conserve drinking water and use it wisely
Water conservation and wise water use are critical issues for Murphy. She advocates for continued education on water conservation and participation in regional recharge projects, as well as emphasizing xeriscape landscaping with native plantings. “Reducing our municipal turf areas, especially those watered with potable water, is key, and I am committed to working closely with my fellow council members to ensure that this happens,” she states.
Limit adding or increasing user fees to “controllable amenities”
While generally opposed to new user taxes, Murphy acknowledges that higher fees for non-residents using controllable amenities, such as the Community Center and The Aquatic Center, could be considered under certain circumstances.
Friday, March 24, 2023
Bits and Pieces
Friday, July 10, 2020
Councilmember Steve Solomon is disruptive during the Sun City Town Hall
The moderator set the rules at the beginning of the town hall:
“I will ask each candidate a unique question and that candidate will have a minute and a half to answer. After that answer, in alphabetical order by last name, the other candidates will be provided up to 45 seconds for a quick response if they so desire.”
Therefore, whenever Bohen or Garner finished their answer, the order for giving a 45 second response would be: Greene – Rodman – Solomon.
But, as usual, Solomon refused to be respectful and follow the rules. In the attached video (just over one minute in length) you will witness the following:
Solomon interrupts Bohen
Tim Bohen discusses the fact that the people who made the largest donations to incumbents Rodman and Solomon’s 2016 town council campaigns were non-residents. (LOVE previously reported that these non-residents were developers, builders, and real estate PACs).
Solomon immediately interrupts. “There you go talking about 2016. If you want to accuse me of something, I suggest you (inaudible). Are we going to allow people to accuse other candidates…"
Throughout this interruption, the moderator can be heard repeatedly saying, “Mr. Solomon…Mr. Solomon…please.” But Solomon ignores him and continues talking over him. (This is the same behavior that Solomon exhibits during town council meetings.)
The moderator then calls on Bill Garner who says, “It’s pretty rich when he [Solomon] talks about his campaign finances because not one dime came from an Oro Valley resident in 2016…"
Solomon interrupts again. “That’s false, that is a lie, he cannot make a false statement a fact.” Garner attempted to finish his turn speaking but Solomon continued interrupting. “Do you live in Marana or do you live in Oro Valley? How about you address that question because you applied for the council in Marana.”
Garner: “Please cut Mr. Solomon off Mr. Moderator.” (Garner is polite and says “please.” He is asking, not demanding.)
Solomon barks orders to the moderator
Solomon: “No, cut Mr. Garner off if he’s going to lie.” (Solomon is abrupt and demanding. He is ordering, not asking.)
Moderator: “Please follow the outline.”
Solomon: “Well, how about we do this? How about we make a pledge not to make false accusations against the candidates because that’s an outright lie.”
(Now Solomon is telling the moderator how to run the meeting. He’s trying to take over the meeting just like he tries to take over Town Council meetings).
Moderator: “Mr. Solomon, you are free in your closing statement to say whatever you would like.”
Solomon’s Diversion Tactics
Solomon tried to make an issue out of a non-issue (Bill Garner’s place of residence) in order to create a diversion and take the focus off of his special-interest campaign contributors. So to clarify, Bill Garner and his family lived in Oro Valley from 2004-2017, then briefly lived in Marana for a little over a year, returning to Oro Valley in February 2019. So yes, Bill Garner is eligible to hold office in Oro Valley.
In 2018, after the sudden passing of Marana Councilmember Carol McGorray whom Garner had known personally for many years, he applied to fill the vacancy when there was a call for applicants to fill the remainder of her term. Garner never ran for the Marana Town Council and had no plans to do so.
Monday, March 23, 2020
Annexation and Oro Valley
The Town of Oro Valley incorporated in 1974. It was 2.4 square miles, centered around the Kreigh Park area. That's the "original" Oro Valley.
Obviously, Oro Valley is much bigger today. It is 36 square miles. That is the result of 20 annexations:
• 12 annexations were less than 1 sq mi
• 5 annexations were between 1 and 3 sq mi
• 3 annexations were greater than 3 sq mi
Rancho Vistoso was the "big annexation"
The town annexed Rancho Vistoso in 1987. When annexed, Sun City was pretty much Rancho Vistoso.
"Sun City was still a relatively small retirement neighborhood miles to the north of Tucson when Oro Valley annexed it in 1987, and the development transitioned from Pima County to the young town.... more than half of Rancho Vistoso was set aside for open space or recreation, including parks, golf course."(source)
Plans for more annexation on the horizon
The town has created a draft annexation plan. That plan is in the process of town council review. The draft plan includes annexation of the following in the future
- Next three years: 800 acres of state lands
- Four to six years: The east side of Oracle Road, north of Ina. That annexation would include Westward Look Resort
- Seven to ten years: Almost 6,000 acres from Ina Road, past La Cholla, north to Overton. That area includes the Foothills Mall.
- Ten years plus: 11,600 acre annexation of the land that is known as "Great Wash". This land is north of Rancho Vistoso.
Thursday, August 2, 2018
Mark Your Calendar: Sun City Candidate Forum
1565 E. Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Residents Fight RV's, Dirt Bikes, Hunting In Their Backyard

The Town Of Oro Valley and residents of the Honeybee Ridge HOA successfully worked together in January to get permission from the federal government to install two gates on what is known as the WAPA (Western Area Power Administration) #180 trail. The trial runs from Rancho Vistoso Blvd to the state lands along the WAPA right of way (easement). The trail is used to maintain the power lines that run to Casa Grande.
The trail closely parallels a barb-wired fence along the back yards of resident of Alamo Canyon Drive (map on right). It is designated by the Town Of Oro Valley as a walking trail. However, the town has no authority to insure that the trail is used in this manner because it is not the town's property.
According to Alamo Canyon Drive resident Sally Schunerman and others: "Honey Bee Development owns the land, and they and Lewis Management are responsible for maintaining the barricade and keeping trespassers out. They have completely failed to do so." (Source: Appearance Before PREC in January.)
Residents estimate that there are 500 users of the trail each week. It has been used than far more than a walking trail during the past year. That is because it us a "back door" to state lands, the boundary of which is less than a mile from their homes. There is a "legal" route to the state lands on Oracle north of Rancho Vistoso Blvd.
On this trail, at any time, one can find cars, recreational vehicles, hunters, guns, bow hunters, and, a few walkers. All, just a few feet from Honeybee Ridge homes.
The way this trail is being used has been of great concern to residents. Dust is constantly being kicked up creating health challenges. Open firearms are being brandished on the trail.
One resident, at a recent Oro Valley Parks and Recreation Board meeting, describe a situation in which a hunter stopped their RV on trail behind their property to hunt down a bobcat. The hunter simply left the RV running and went after the bobcat. The vehicle was parked just a few feet from the back of the property.
The installation of the gates is not quite a done deal but the help of the town should get this done. According to Misti Nowak, Oro Valley Town Communications Director: "Our Constituent Services Coordinator (Jessica) is now working on this project with the Honey Bee Ridge Estates HOA. The HOA is working on negotiations for a contractor to install the gate."
Once installed, the gates should deter the continuing hassle and dangers that rampant, illegal use of this trail has caused.
---







