Showing posts with label town manager. Show all posts
Showing posts with label town manager. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Jeff Wilkins is New Oro Valley Town Manager

Council to approve Wilkins employment agreement tonight
The Oro Valley Town Council has selected Jeff Wilkins as Town Manager. Wilkins was one of two finalists for the position. The council will approve his employment agreement tonight. The agreement is a two year agreement from the time of his employment, which can be no later than July 1.  

Becomes Oro Valley's most highly compensated employee
Wilkins will receive a signing bonus of $25,000. His annual salary will be $200,000. He will receive fully paid health, dental, life and disability insurance, and the use of a town vehicle. He will also receive cost of living adjustments to his pay as do other town employees. 

Also to receive funding for retirement
In addition, "the town will pay into his retirement pension [by making] a deferred compensation payment into [his] Employee’s 457 retirement savings account in an amount of Ten Thousand Twenty-Six Dollars and Twelve Cents ($10,026.12) per year (payable in equal installments each regular Town pay period)." (Source: Wilkins Employment Agreement)

Welcome to Oro Valley, Jeff
“We look forward to welcoming Jeff Wilkins as our new town manager,” said Oro Valley Mayor Joe Winfield. “His wealth of knowledge and depth of experience in local government will help Oro Valley continue to thrive. My fellow councilmembers and I are confident in this decision, and we look forward to this next chapter of leadership in our community.” 

"I am humbled by being selected by the Town Council,” said Wilkins. “Everyone I've met has been very gracious and proud of Oro Valley. I believe Oro Valley is a community of excellence, and I look forward to working with the Town Council, staff, and citizens to ensure Oro Valley continues to be a great community to live, work and play."

Meet Jeff 
Jeff Wilkins has dedicated his career to local government for 27 years. He proudly served communities in Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio in roles as County Administrator, City Manager, Assistant Town Manager and Director of Administration and Treasurer. He served communities during fast growth, slow growth, and redevelopment. All positions required his leadership in strategic planning, intergovernmental relations, economic development, capital planning, budget and finance, team building and HR/staff development.

His long tenure of 15 years as County Administrator of Kendall County, Illinois (40 miles southwest of Chicago) was when the county had the fastest growth rate per the US Census Bureau. His service required leadership, collaboration, and financial planning from initial concept through successful implementation for strategic projects such as a courthouse expansion, jail expansion and new health department facility. He is especially proud of his leadership of Kendall Area Transit - the county’s first public transportation system serving the entire county with 12 incorporated cities.

Wilkins strives to build teams and collaboration for internal and community initiatives. His teams plan together for goals and celebrate together when accomplished. Wilkins earned his master’s degree from Indiana University and bachelor’s degree from DePauw University. Wilkins and his wife, Gina, are proud parents of two children, and they enjoy time with their two rescue dogs and rescue cat.
(Source: Town of Oro Valley Media Release)
- - -

Thursday, October 13, 2022

Meet Chris Cornelison... Oro Valley's Acting Town Manager

The Town of Oro Valley's Acting Town Manager is Chris Cornelison. Chris assumed this role after the resignation of Mary Jacobs. We asked him to share a bit about himself with the LOVE community.

Focus on moving the town forward as directed by Council
As you can imagine, Chris is busy, at the moment "ensuring that the organization and the community move forward, committed to the directives laid out by Town Council and community."

12th year serving the community
Chris began working with the Town of Oro Valley in 2010 as a part-time graduate intern. Two years later, he was hired full-time by the Town and served in various roles. He was named Assistant Town Manager in March 2017. More recently, his title changed to Deputy Town Manager "... and then—as you know—with Mary’s departure, I am now serving as Acting Town Manager." He will serve in this role until Council contracts a Town Manager.

UA Eller School Graduate... MPA from UA
Chris earned a Bachelor of Science in Public Administration from the University of Arizona’s Eller College of Management, in 2010.  He graduated with a double major: Criminal Justice and Management & Public Policy. He earned a Master of Public Administration from the UA School of Government and Public Policy in 2012, with a dual focus in Finance and Local Government.

Active in the profession and the community
Chris is a current member of the International City/County Manager’s Association (ICMA). He plans to apply this year to become a Credentialed Manager Candidate. He also is a member of the Arizona City/County Manager’s Association (ACMA) and served as the Chair for the 2017 ACMA Winter Conference. Chris currently serves as a member of the Community Advisory Board for the University of Arizona School of Government and Public Policy. He is a Professional Advisor for the UA ICMA Student Chapter.

Focused on four key town departments as Deputy Town Manager
As Deputy Town Manager, Chris provided support to four very important departments: Public Works, Parks & Recreation, Community & Economic Development and Town Clerk. He led negotiation efforts with the Town’s Public Safety Negotiations Committee, and served on the Town’s Budget Committee for the bulk of his tenure with the Town. 

Led "OVSafeSteps COVID Business Assistance Program"
One of Chris' notable projects with the Town was his role as Project Manager for the award-winning OVSafeSteps COVID business assistance program launched 2020. "Helping people and providing support to more than 200 local businesses was a collaborative and rewarding experience. The success of this program was a result of the wonderful team at the Town and our community partners like the Greater Oro Valley Chamber of Commerce."

A collaborative work style
Chris describes his work stye as collaborative, honest, direct and fair—"Qualities that I believe will serve me well as I help guide our organization through the coming months."

LOVE thoughts:  Big challenges ahead
It is going to take a while for the town to identify Town Manager candidates. Then, add to that the time it will take for the Council to consider, select, and contract an individual. During this time, big things are happening. This includes possible General Plan Amendments, major public hearings on zoning and  PAD requested changes, and, as we posted this week, key decisions Council needs to make on Parks and Recreation Bond amenities. 

Fortunately, Chris has the direct experience of working with the key departments involved in these efforts. That experience should help him keep the town on a steady course.
--
More about Chris Cornelison
"On a personal note, I have been with my wife, Bernadette, for more than 13 years (married for the past 8 years), and we are the proud parents of two wonderful and energetic children, ages 4 (daughter) and 11 months (son). Bernadette currently teaches at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy as an Assistant Clinical Professor, while spending half of her time as a practitioner at a Banner Clinic in Tucson. Between our busy jobs and two kiddos, we are an active household, which we love. It’s fair to say we enjoy the challenge of balancing demanding jobs while juggling home life and demanding little personalities.

When we are not visiting family or friends, we enjoy hiking, attending community events and just spending time helping our children grow."

Thursday, May 5, 2022

Guest View: Mike Zinkin – “Abide by the policies set forth in the Town Code and Council Policies”

Below is the speech that Mike Zinkin addressed to the Town Council during the April 20th Call to the Audience.
- - -

Mayor and Council,
It is time to take back control of this Town from the Town Manager and abide by the policies set forth in the Town Code and Council Policies.

I have communicated with you on more than one occasion that at the Council meeting of March 4, 2015, the Council passed a motion taking $2.1 million from the General Fund to “kick start the Community Center Fund (CCF).” The motion also stated that the CCF would pay back the General Fund within 10 years with an annual payback of $120,000.

I have noticed that the $120,000 payback was not made during this fiscal year. When I brought this to the attention of you and the Town Manager, the reply I received from the Town Manager was, “A prior Council’s actions cannot bind a current or future Council.”

One councilmember wrote the Town Manager and informed her that her response could not be verified.

Town Code Article 2 Section 4-7 states that the Town will abide by Robert's Rules of Order. Robert's Rules state that a motion can be modified in two ways. A motion to reconsider, or a motion to rescind.

A motion to reconsider must be made no later than the next scheduled meeting. Some of you have attempted to do this regarding another matter, but the Town Manager obstructed your attempt which was in violation of Council Policy #11.

A motion to rescind can be made at any time but requires 5 votes to pass. Unless you move to rescind the 2015 motion, you are obligated to continue the annual $120,000 payback to the General Fund from the CCF.

Additionally, the Town Manager has hired a CIP Director (Capital Improvements Project), which is a position that was not budgeted. Town Policy 6 mandates the Town Manager to come to you for any unbudgeted expenses. The Town Manager tells me that this is a temporary position and is funded by the CIP Fund. Temporary or not, it is unfunded. Using the CIP Fund is also a violation in that CIP funding is from one-time revenues and is to be spent on one-time expenses. An employee is an ongoing expense. This is another violation.

Page 226 of the FY 20/21 adopted budget allocates $105,000 during FY 21/22 for “Council Chamber Audiovisual upgrades.” In a recent communication with the staff, I was informed that the Council Chamber renovation cost $607,125.00 and was paid for with Federal CARES funding. I don’t care where the funding came from, what concerns me is that you did not authorize it. The Town Manager never came forward to request unbudgeted expenses, again in violation of Town Policy.

This must stop. You need to gather in the Town Manager and set some boundaries and reinforce the rules. At this point, you also have enough evidence to terminate her for cause. Do something, as you are ultimately responsible.

- - -
Mike Zinkin and his wife have lived in Oro Valley since 1998. He served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009, the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012, and the Town Council from 2012-2016. He was named a Fellow for the National League of Cities. He was a member of the NLC Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee. He was an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. Mike has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge.

Tuesday, March 22, 2022

Guest View: Mike Zinkin – Where did all the allocated money go?

Something is amiss in Oro Valley governance
The type of Government we have in Oro Valley is based on the Town Council (elected officials) making the Town’s policies, and the Town staff (unelected officials led by the Town Manager), carrying out those policies. 

 However, in Oro Valley something is amiss.

Council sets policy. Staff implements. 
The Council has study sessions and public meetings to ensure that the budget is fully vetted by both the policy makers and the public. The budget process is somewhat lengthy and detailed, and the vote to amend and approve is the most important vote the Council makes every year.

The Council should feel confident that their policies, as reflected in the annual budget, come to fruition
However, there is a real problem in Oro Valley in that the adopted spending policy has not been carried out.

We have heard how the Council allocated $750,000 to make the Community Center ADA compliant. What happened? Where did the allocated money go? The Council has enough on their plate without having to worry about their policies coming to fruition.

The State of Arizona requires that all budgets be balanced
If the Town Manager submits in the budget that an expenditure is $X, then there must be $X in revenues. For example, if there was $750,000 allocated for Community Center ADA compliance issues, then there has to be $750,000 in revenues.

Town Council’s adopted budgets are not being implemented
On page 244 of the adopted budget for FY 19/20, there is a Capital Improvement allocation for a $3,000,000 bond for golf course irrigation improvements. What happened? Was there a bond, and, if so, where are the improvements? On page 227 of the adopted budget for FY 20/21, there is a Capital Improvement allocation for $1,100,000 for golf course irrigation. What happened? Where are the improvements?

On page 230 on the adopted budget for FY 21/22, there is a Capital Improvement allocation for $90,000 for tennis court resurfacing. However, the Council just passed a bond where some of the money is going to resurface tennis courts. What happened to the allocated $90,000?

On page 110 of the adopted budget for FY 21/22, there is a breakdown of the personnel allocated to the Town Manager’s office. In this breakdown there is no allocation for the position of CIP Director. However, there was a recent Facebook posting advertising a position for a CIP Director. This is a position that is not budgeted. 

Where did the Federal Cares Act money go?
During the Call to Audience at the March 16th Town Council meeting, Town Council Candidate Bill Rodman stated that the Town received $5.3 million in Federal Cares Act money. Who authorized the spending of this money and where did it go? Did the Town even consider spending this money on piping reclaimed water to Jim Kriegh Park or Riverfront Park or to the Pusch Ridge Golf Course?

Town Policies are being ignored
There are adopted Town Policies which have been ignored by this Council and Town Manager. Town Policy 6, adopted on 3/5/97, and reaffirmed on 4/20/05 is titled “Unbudgeted Expenses”. It directs the Town Manager to go to Council for approval for any unbudgeted expenses. Where was the Council approval for the above-mentioned unbudgeted position?

The Council needs to fix this problem
It is unfortunate that our underpaid part-time Council members cannot rely on the Town Manager, who makes over $184,000/year to carry out adopted policies and procedures. The Council must ensure that their policies are carried out.

The Council must ask: What happened to the $750,000 for ADA compliance? What happened to the previously approved expenditure totaling $4,100,000 for golf course irrigation? Where did the allocation for a position in the Town Manager’s office come from?

It is too bad that our Town Council cannot expect their decisions to be carried out. Unfortunately, this delinquency is costing Oro Valley a lot of money.
- - -
You can watch Zinkin's remarks to council on this matter above.
- - -
Mike Zinkin and his wife have lived in Oro Valley since 1998. He served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009, the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012, and the Town Council from 2012-2016. He was named a Fellow for the National League of Cities. He was a member of the NLC Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee. He was an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. Mike has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge.

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

The Watchdog Report: The $750,000 Dollar Question

 

Who remembers the letter to the Council from the Town Manager dated September 4, 2019?
Yes, this is a loaded question because I seriously doubt if any of the council members would remember it since it was communicated almost six months ago. Additionally, neither Council members Greene nor Bohen were on Council when the above communication was written.

However, this is an important document because it offers the Town Manager’s forecast with the important caveat that the Mayor stipulated -- that the 36-hole option would require no more than a $750,000 tax subsidy.

Ms. Jacobs’ report was full of prerequisites that had to be fulfilled before the maximum subsidy of $750,000 could be accomplished. One of the requirements was that “The irrigation replacement and general refurbishment of both 18-hole courses was completed.” This had not even been started and the costs for just the irrigation improvements for the Conquistador course alone are over $1 million. This money is to come from the existing Community Center Fund, when, and if, it becomes available.

The forecasted target dates
In her report Ms. Jacobs states:
“By adding in the sales taxes collected by Troon for golf ($46,500), the utility sales tax for the water ($40,400), and the projected additional revenue from opening up the member course to day-play ($175,000), the subsidy is projected to meet the $750,000 target by FY 22/23. If the HOA contribution discussed below is factored into the pro forma, the subsidy is projected to meet the $750,000 target by FY 21/22.”
Jacobs goes on to say:
“According to the pro formas attached, the $750,000 tax subsidy target is achievable by FY 21/22 and possibly sooner if revenue collections remain strong. The potential action plan and accompanying pro formas included in this memorandum more fully demonstrate the financial viability.”

You can read the entire report HERE.  

Since this communication was written almost six months ago, nothing has been accomplished toward improving the courses because the money is not there. Currently available financials from the first 5 months of FY 2020/21 (July-Nov) reveal that the tax subsidy is already over $1 million.

The current formula is not working
How many communications are going to be written, and forgotten, before the Council understands that the 36-hole formula is not working and will not work?

The Mayor and 3 Council members ran on a platform to do something about the golf financial drain. The meetings and abuse they took from the “Green Shirts” are over.

Although golf is up 30% nationwide due to the pandemic, losses continue for Oro Valley due to the fact that our golfing population cannot support one entity owning 36 holes. The Town could possibly support the losses with just 18 holes.

Mr. Lopez and HSL want nothing to do with golf as witnessed by their refusal to take on the 9-hole Pusch Ridge course. This is further evidence that golf does not make good business sense.

Oro Valley is made up of more neighborhoods than Canada Hills and the Villages. In fact, the vast majority of Oro Valley residents live outside those communities. What it is going to take for the council to represent the entire Town, and not just one faction?

---
Mike Zinkin and his wife have lived in Oro Valley since 1998. He served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009, the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012, and the Town Council from 2012-2016. He was named a Fellow for the National League of Cities. He was a member of the NLC Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee. He was an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. Mike has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge.

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

Guest View: Mike Zinkin ~ Did our Town Manager exceed her authority in extending the Troon contract?

There have been some recent changes to the Town’s contract with Troon.

The good news
Recently, Town Manager, Mary Jacobs, removed Troon’s responsibility to oversee tennis. This reduced Troon’s management fee from $144,000 to $120,000 annually. As a result, Troon’s monthly stipend was reduced from $12,000/month to $10,000/month. These changes became effective on October 2, 2018.

I think we can all agree that this was a move that the Citizens of Oro Valley can applaud. Tennis has now become the responsibility of Jennifer Fuchs who, in the past, was the Director of Tennis for the El Conquistador Resort. Removing this responsibility from Troon was a great move because although Troon is known as the “Rolex of Golf,” they appeared to be the “Timex of Tennis.”

All the above changes are within Ms. Jacob’s area of responsibility.

The potential problem
At the same time these changes were made, she also extended the Troon contract for 6 months. Herein lies the problem.

During numerous communications with the Town, they have failed to show where Ms. Jacobs has the authority to extend Troon’s contract without Council approval. She has some authority to work within a $20,000 limit. However, the contract, which is now $10,000/month was extended 6 months. This means that she exceeded her $20,000 limit as the contract extension amounts to a $60,000 expenditure.

Town Policy #6, Unbudgeted Expenditures
This policy was adopted in March 1997 and reaffirmed in April 2005. It states that ALL expenditures not previously budgeted shall be approved by Council prior to issuance of payment. It goes on to state that it is the responsibility of the Town Manager to implement this policy.

Why does this matter?
The fiscal year ends on June 30, 2019. Ms. Jacobs extended the contract from June 30, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Therefore, the entire extension reaches into the next fiscal year, FY 2019/20. Until the Council passes the FY 2019/20 budget, there are NO expenditures authorized past June 30, 2019.  So although the Town Manager may have the authority to extend the contract, there is no authorization to expend the funding without council approval.  I wonder if Troon realizes that this 6-month extension is currently without funding.

Continuing with this kind of mentality, the Town Manager could promise employee raises of 5% next year or promise to give the Chamber of Commerce $75,000 next year...but unless and until the Town Council approves the spending, these are empty promises.

Where are the checks and balances? The Town’s Legal Director works for the Town Manager, therefore, his loyalties are with the Town Manager, NOT the Council.

The bottom line is that the Town Manager extended the Troon contract without Town Council authorization to fund it.  Whether or not this current contract extension should be funded is now up to the current council when they deliberate on the 2019-20 budget.  In the meantime, Troon has a contract without legally approved funding.  This is not a good situation for them and it is not good for the Town.
-----
Mike Zinkin has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge. He was a commissioned ensign in the United States Navy Reserve. He was an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. He and his wife moved to Oro Valley in 1998. Mike served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009 and the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012. He served on the Town Council from 2012-2016 during which time he was named a Fellow for the National League of Cities University, he was a member of the National League of Cities Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development, and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee.

Friday, November 16, 2018

Jacobs To Hear Your Concerns on Moore and LaCanada Traffic Control


Town Manager Jacobs issues a monthly to council. The report is now available on line. The following "items in quote" are from the November report.

---
Jacobs to hear your thoughts on traffic control at Moore and LaCanada
"The Town Engineer and the internal Traffic Safety Committee are recommending to me [Jacobs] that the Town install a roundabout rather than a traffic signal at the intersection of Moore and La Canada. Since there was significant interest in the intersection at a neighborhood meeting held earlier this year, I will hold a final neighborhood meeting on Monday, December 3 to personally listen to issues and concerns prior to making a decision." The budget for this project is $1million.

Strategic Planning in store for council and executive leadership team
"The Town received eight responses from firms interested in providing strategic planning services to the new Council and Executive Leadership Team. The proposals are under review and we anticipate awarding a contract to the selected firm later this month."

Economic development creation plan in progress
"The CED Director is working with the Town Manager to finalize an Economic Development Strategy outlining specific strategies and tactics on how to retain, expand and attract new primary and service sector investment and job creation in Oro Valley. The finalized report will be forwarded to the Town Council in the near future."

Community Center getting facelift
"The Community Center lobby will have a facelift in November. New carpet and front desk reconfiguration will result in improved aesthetics, improved customer service flow and improved staff security and safety. Minor disruptions on Nov 20-21, but members will be notified well in advance"

Overlook restaurant still in business
"The Overlook restaurant will continue to facilitate the very popular Family Fish Fry, Second Saturday, Date Night and Third Thursday Pasta and Pizza. New fall hours went into effect on October 1. The Overlook will serve lunch daily from 10 a.m.-4 p.m. The annual Thanksgiving Holiday Buffet will be served on Thursday, November 22, from 1-5 p.m."
---

Monday, April 30, 2018

Guest View: Mike Zinkin ~ The $6 Million Dollar Bond

The “turn-key” Community Center needs another $6 MM in taxpayer funds
In December 2014, Town Manager, Greg Caton, plus Mayor Hiremath, and Councilmembers Hornat, Snider, and Waters insisted that the Community Center and Golf course purchase was a great deal because it was a “turn-key” operation costing only $1 million dollars and that no debt service would be required. Turns out that this has become just another one of their lies/broken promises.

Through a series of email exchanges with the Town, I recently learned that Town Manager, Mary Jacobs is recommending a $6 MM bond for Community Center expenses, with half to be spent in FY 2018/19 and half in FY 2019/20.

According to Finance Director, Stacey Lemos, the actual cost for this bond, assuming an interest rate of 5% over 20 years will total an estimated $8.7 million dollars.

A Budget Study session will be held on Wednesday, May 2nd at 3 PM in Town Council Chambers. Will the mayor and council consider approving a $6 million bond in order to save golf? We expect that they will since none of their previous efforts to finance the Community Center and Golf Courses have been successful.

The Repeated Lies and Broken Promises of the Town Council

• They promised that the half-cent sales tax increase would cover ALL Community Center costs. It hasn’t.

• They asserted that there would be no debt service. Yet, here we are, three years later, discussing a $6 MM bond for Community Center/Golf expenses.

• They lied when they said that only $1.2 MM would be taken from the General Fund Contingency to jump-start the Community Center Fund. As you will recall, they had to transfer another $350,000 from the General Fund last year to meet Community Center expenses.

• They lied when they promised they would pay back the $1.2 MM to the General Fund with $120,000 a year for the next 10 years.

• They spent $50,000 of taxpayer money on a Golf Study and then completely ignored the recommendations.

Mary Jacobs email stated the following:
“I point you to page iv of the Town Manager’s budget message that outlines how the recommended capital expenditure is being budgeted in FY 18/19.

In addition, the Recommended Budget includes half of the projected $6 million in total planned funding for capital improvements at the Community Center building as well as irrigation system replacement, turf reduction and other improvements on the Canada and Conquistador 18-hole golf courses. The expenditure will be financed via the issuance of a 20 year bond, and debt service will be repaid through the Capital Fund…..it’s a $6 million bond with HALF of it expected to be expended in 18/19, and HALF expended in 19/20.” (emphasis added)

Page 228 of the TMRB
Town Manager Jacobs has requested $3.6 MM for golf course repairs and $2.4 MM in Community Center improvements (TOTAL $6 MM) spread over two years and financed with a 20-year bond

The following information was obtained from Page 228 of the Town Manager’s Recommended Budget (TMRB).

COMMUNITY CENTER (CC) BOND FUNDED IMPROVEMENTS

                                                                     FY18/19                FY19/20                  TOTAL
Community Center Improvements              $1,200,000            $1,200,000              $2,400,000
Golf Course Irrigation Replacement           $1,800,000            $1,800,000              $3,600,000
TOTAL CC BOND IMPROVEMENTS         $3,000,000            $3,000,000              $6,000,000

The Town Council’s Community Center financing plan did not work
The additional half cent sales tax was supposed to offset ALL expenses for the Community Center, including golf, tennis, and the Community Center building. Instead, all of the sales tax revenue is going down the drain for golf. As such, there have been limited funds for capital improvements which is why the Town now wants to bond $3M in the 2018/19 budget and another $3M in the 2019/2020 budget.

How many more millions of taxpayer dollars are they going to spend on this endeavor before they admit that they made a mistake in purchasing the El Con Community Center and Golf Courses?
---
Mike Zinkin has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge. He was a commissioned ensign in the United States Navy Reserve. He was an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. He and his wife moved to Oro Valley in 1998. Mike served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009 and the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012. He served on the Town Council from 2012-2016 during which time he was named a Fellow for the National League of Cities University, he was a member of the National League of Cities Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development, and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee.

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Town Manager admits that Mike Zinkin's Community Center predictions were accurate

Let's look back...

October 8, 2015


Excerpt from article by Tim Steller, Arizona Daily Star. “In OV elections, golf is legitimate concern.”

“He [Zinkin] alleged that the town’s revenue projections (Community Center, golf, restaurant & tennis) are too optimistic.”

Fast-forward approximately two and a half years…

February 2, 2018

Excerpt from Town Manager, Mary Jacobs memo to the Town Council regarding Community Center and Golf Operations


“It is my professional opinion that pre-purchase financial/operational projections were overly optimistic in suggesting that initial needed capital investments in the aging facility and golf courses could be paid from the Community Center Fund. The financial model was overly reliant on a projected increase in membership, something that did not transpire as expected.”

[Thanks to Take Back OV for providing this information. View their website HERE]

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Guest View: Mike Zinkin ~ Troon enters the Circle of Deceit

In yesterday’s article, “Oro Valley Government Lies to the Citizens” we offered numerous instances in which the Town Staff lied to the citizens in order to paint a rosy picture of what would happen if the Town purchased the El Conquistador Country Club with the intent to turn it into a Community Center for Oro Valley residents. Today’s article discusses how Troon also lied in order to seal the deal.

During the December 17, 2014 Town Council discussion on the El Conquistador purchase, it was a given that Troon would hold the management contract for golf, tennis, food and beverage. The purchase agreement with HSL Properties mandated that Troon must be the management company. Troon became part of the "pitch" that perpetuated the lies that Town Staff was giving the Council.

Here’s what Troon told the Council
Troon told the Council that their projections showed that in FY 2015/16, the Town would incur a $1,169,842 loss. In reality we lost $2,567,385. (Troon’s projection was off by $1,397,543).

Troon also stated that in FY 2016/17, we would lose $637,517. In reality, we lost $2,512,938. (Troon’s projection was off by $1,875,421).

Troon further stated that in In FY 2017/18, we were only going to lose $151,120. As of December 2017, we have already lost $1,257,785. (Troon’s projection is already off by $1,106,665).

Additionally, Troon stated that in FY 2018/19, the Town was going to MAKE $217,049. Keep in mind these numbers do not include the needed capital improvements we discussed yesterday because those improvements are the Town’s responsibility, not Troon's.

So far, Troon's projections have been off by over $4.3 million.

[Below is the slide showing Troon’s projections from 2015 through 2019. Click to enlarge.]

During the first year of Troon's contract with the Town, they admitted their error in the projections and offered to reimburse the Town for their last 3 months of management fees ($36,000) which the Town gladly accepted. This has not happened again. Troon continues to misrepresent the truth, and, more important, they continue to get praised by the Council. With this trail of untruths, how does Troon keep their job?

To sum up the last two postings:
• In order to please the Council majority, Staff lied to present a rosy picture of the HSL purchase.
• Staff did not even budget their own projections for capital outlay.
• Troon, in concert with Staff, made outrageous projections about golf revenues.

More lies on the horizon?
The current Town Manager, Mary Jacobs, has now inherited this mess. Her idea is to continue 36 holes of golf despite millions in losses and to incur a debt service to make up for all the previous lies. She has never considered discontinuing golf or at least reducing it to an 18-hole course in order to stop the bleeding. Remember, the Town Manager works for the Council majority and it’s in her best interest to tell them what they want to hear. So…will she also lie in order to keep her job?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mike Zinkin has a Bachelor’s degree in history and government from the University of Arizona and a Master’s degree in Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education from California State University, Northridge. He was a commissioned ensign in the United States Navy Reserve in 1969. He worked as an Air Traffic Controller for 30 years. He and his wife moved to Oro Valley after retiring in 1998. Mike served on the Oro Valley Development Review Board from 2005-2009, the Board of Adjustment from 2011-2012, and the Town Council from 2012-2016. During his time on council, he was named as one of 23 Leadership Fellows for the National League of Cities University, he was a member of the National League of Cities Steering Committee for Community and Economic Development, and a member of the Arizona League of Cities Budget and Economic Development Committee.

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Guest View: Mike Zinkin ~ Oro Valley Government lies to the citizens

Those who saw the movie, "The Post" learned that the "Pentagon Papers" were a classified government document that showed that every presidential administration from Eisenhower to Nixon lied to the American people about what was going on with the Vietnam War. Although not of the same scope, something very similar is happening in Oro Valley.

Town Staff Controls the Message
When one attends the Newly Elected Training Session (for new councilmembers) presented by the Arizona League of Cities and Towns, one learns (among other things) about the Open Meeting Laws, how to work with the media, and that Town staff controls the message.

Governing boards, whether they be City Councils, School Boards, Boards of Supervisors, etc., are made up of ordinary people. They are not Planners or Civil Engineers or Public Safety experts. They are laymen that are interested in their communities and have a desire to help establish policies. As a result, they depend on the information provided to them by their staff.

Staff works for the Town Manager, who works for the majority of Council. During my four years as an Oro Valley Town Council Member, I was told on many occasions by former Town Manager, Greg Caton, that, "I do not work for any individual Councilmember, I work for the Council majority."

Why is this the case? Because if the Town Manager does not please the Council majority, the Town Manager will lose his/her job. As a result, the message that the Town Manager gives to the 7-member Town Council is manipulated to please the 4-member Council majority. It’s in the Town Manager’s best interest to tell them what they want to hear.

This happens all the time, but on December 17, 2014, the night the Council voted to purchase the HSL property (the Community Center plus Golf and Tennis), the staff controlled the message to show that the purchase was desirable for the Town because that’s what the mayor and his Majority-4 cohorts wanted to hear.

The Message was a Lie
Now that we have almost three years of financial data as evidence, we can see that the message was a lie.

The message was that all expenditures, including the needed capital improvements, would be covered by the dedicated increased sales tax plus the revenues derived from the facility and that no money would be taken out of any other Town funds to supplement Community Center/Golf expenses (other than for the initial transfer of $1.2 million from the General Fund to the Community Center Fund which would be paid back at $120,000 per year for 10 years.)

The Power Point presentation provided to the Council shows that in the area of capital improvements for both the facility and golf, they would spend the following:

$810,000 in FY 2014/15      (including $50,000 for golf improvements)
$1,860,500 in FY 2015/16   (including $1,310,500 for golf improvements)
$1,772,500 in FY 2016/17   (including $1,282,500 for golf improvements)
$596,000 in FY 2017/18      (including $130,000 for golf improvements)

And between 2015-2018, they were going to spend:

$1,037,000 for "ADA and Code Compliance Life Safety Issues"
$522,000 in "Facility Restoration"

These two slides show what they were planning to spend on golf improvements, ADA compliance, and facility restoration in each fiscal year. [Click to enlarge]


With this information, the Council majority (Mayor Hiremath, Vice Mayor Waters, Councilmembers Hornat and Snider) voted to purchase the property. However, it now appears that the staff lied in order to please the Majority-4 Councilmembers.

The Budget was a Lie

In fact, after the purchase was made, staff only budgeted the following:

$1,115,000 in FY 2015/16    (NOT the $1,860,500 that was promised)
$527,200 in FY 2016/17       (NOT the $1,772,500 that was promised)
$94,250 in FY 2017/18         (NOT the $596,000 that was promised)

How much did they actually spend?

The real story lies in what they promised vs. what they budgeted vs. what they spent.

In FY 2014/15, they spent only $37,873 of the $810,000 they promised. I’ll give them a pass on this due to the 2015 referendum which delayed the purchase until May 2015; however, the promised capital improvements were not carried over to the next fiscal year.

In FY 2015/16 the total capital outlay was only $499,744 of the $1,860,500 they promised.

In FY 2016/17 the actual capital outlay was only $72,414 of the $1,772,500 they promised.

Half-way into FY 2017/18, the capital outlay is only $29,464 which is a far cry from the $596,000 they promised.

The promise that no money would be taken from any other Town funds was a Lie
Remember that all this money was going to come from the sales tax increase and revenues from the golf and community center. There was not going to be any more money taken from the General Fund (other than the $1.2 million to start the Community Center Fund).

Here’s what actually happened. In June 2017, the Town Council voted to transfer an additional $350,000 from the General Fund to the Community Center Fund. Later in 2017, the staff took $21,323 from the Bed Tax fund (hotel room tax) to cover the overage from tennis court improvements.

Now the Town Manager and Council are discussing the potential of bonding (incurring a debt service) for the continued improvements required for the Community Center facility and Golf courses.

They lied. It’s clear that there was no way the needed capital improvements and the required Operations and Maintenance for the purchase would be covered by the sales tax increase. They didn't even budget for the promised improvements in the subsequent budgets. They promised there would be no debt service (bonding) but now they’re discussing bonding to pay for Community Center expenses. They lied.

You think this is bad? Part 2 will discuss Troon’s lies.

[Slides provided in this article are from the December 17, 2014 Power Point presentation]

Part 2 will be published on Thursday.

Monday, February 12, 2018

Editorial ~ Remember when?

Today we will take a trip down Memory Lane to see if the assertions made by the mayor and council regarding the Community Center/Golf Courses have proven to be true or false.

2014 Assertion: The Community Center is a Turnkey Operation (False)
Remember how the Mayor told us about the "turnkey" operation we were getting with the purchase of the Community Center? That "turnkey" operation has already drained $2.45 million from our General Fund Contingency.

2015 Assertion: The sales tax increase will cover all Community Center expenses (False)
Remember being told repeatedly by the Town Council that the Community Center Fund (financed with the dedicated sales tax revenue) would cover ALL the needs of the Community Center including golf and tennis and that NO MONEY would be taken from any other fund? [See “2017 FACT” below to see how that turned out.]

2017 Assertion: The Community Center is not using any other Town funds (False)
Remember Councilmember Steve Solomon stating at the April 19th council meeting:
“The Golf and Community Center revenues and the dedicated half cent sales tax for this year will cover all of its costs. It’s not using any other Town funds. It’s not taking money from any other Town project or Town source.”
Once again, Solomon is full of bluster. Read on to learn why.

2017 FACT: Town dips into Bed Tax Revenues to cover Community Center renovations
The Quarterly CIP Report (Capital Improvement Program) for the quarter ending 12/31/17 revealed that the Tennis Court Improvements were budgeted for $75,000. However, the improvements actually cost $96,323. (This is a 28.4% miscalculation).

Where did the additional funds come from to cover the overage? They came from the Bed Tax Fund! (The tax on hotel rooms).

So now we have another fund supporting this “turnkey” operation. This does not include the monies that Councilmember Rodman stated that we will need to borrow ($4.7 - $5 million) to fulfill the recommendations identified in the Town Manager’s presentation to the Council during the February 7th Golf Study Session. Rodman stated, “We’re going to have to finance this no matter what we do.”

Conclusion
Council assertions about the financial sustainability of the Community Center/Golf Course purchase have been, at best, wishful thinking…and at worst, deliberate lies to cover for their reckless decision to purchase this money pit. 

As a side note, the Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force are no longer going to supplement golf at Davis-Monthan.  The Blanchard Golf Course is closing at the end of April.  The U.S. Government has decided to stop paying $400,000 a year to water the golf courses and to discontinue supplementing the $700,000 a year in golf losses.  For how long will Oro Valley continue to supplement the losses at the El Con Golf Courses?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Editor’s Note: Mayor Hiremath and Councilmembers Hornat, Snider, and Waters are up for re-election this year. These are the four “public servants” who made the disastrous decision to purchase the Community Center (including 31 tennis courts and 3 golf courses) and to increase your sales tax in order to meet the expenses. You will have an opportunity to vote them out of office during the primary election in August.

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

TOWN COUNCIL MEETING

Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Town Council Chambers
11,000 La Canada Drive

4:00 PM ~ Golf Study Session
Open to the Public

Presentations by Town Manager, Mary Jacobs and Troon President, Rob DeMore. Also a possible discussion by the mayor and council regarding the future of the Community Center and golf courses.

6:00 PM ~Town Council Regular Session

Pay special attention to:

Consent Agenda, Item E

Resolution…with regard to the approximate 934 acres of State Land (Tangerine South and Tangerine North) the Town intends to pursue annexation, and does not have nor does it intend to adopt, regulations requiring the fencing of open range livestock grazing or prohibiting mining on State Land annexed into the Town.”

The Town claims that this is “a standard formality related to livestock grazing and mining” and that the “Town Staff does not anticipate either of these activities to actually occur on these two parcels.”

You can view the agenda HERE

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Guest View: Diane Peters ~ Town allows golf members and golf course area residents to dominate the discussion. Part 2.

Scroll down to read Part 1 which was published yesterday and includes my letter to the town manager. The Town’s response and my follow-up email are below.

Response from Jessica Hynd on December 20th:
"Town Manager Mary Jacobs has asked that I follow up with you regarding your most recent email. The general public had the opportunity to speak during the special session held on July 12, 2017 when the assessment and recommendation was presented to the Town Council. Additionally, the community can always provide their opinions and feedback regarding the final report through the Ask Oro Valley portal, which is provided to Council bi-weekly."

Unsatisfied with this response, I sent a follow-up email on December 21st. Excerpt below:
"Yes, on July 12, 2017, there was a Study Session. There was one item on that agenda...Presentation and discussion regarding consultant report for Town golf and restaurant operations. However, that agenda says nothing about a Public Hearing on this topic. The minutes show that 7 residents did get up to speak.

Here’s what needs to be considered:

The 7 people who spoke at the July 12th meeting consisted of the President of the Men's Golf Association, followed by 6 residents who live along the golf courses and/or play golf.

The taxpayers did not receive special invitations to this meeting.

This meeting was also held in mid-July when many Oro Valley citizens have left town for cooler climates and many have returned to their second homes in New England and Minnesota. In fact, during the July 12th meeting for people living along the golf courses, one speaker stated that besides living along the golf courses, he was there to speak on behalf of members of the golf club who couldn't attend because they are snowbirds and were away for the summer.

[Including the July 12th meeting] this is now FOUR special meetings where the only people who were heard were residents living along the golf courses and residents who play golf. The Town has allowed them to dominate the discussion.

Yes, the rest of us can always provide our opinions and feedback via the Ask Oro Valley portal, which is provided to Council bi-weekly...but the golf course area residents and golfers also have this option along with all of their special meetings.

Why are the taxpayers, who are being forced to subsidize something that we never requested, being placed so low on the priority list? As a group, we are paying more in taxes to support this misadventure than what the golfers and homeowners living along the courses are contributing, and yet they have been allowed to have a much larger seat at the table than the rest of us. This is unconscionable considering that the taxpayers did not approve the purchase of the golf courses and they never approved the increased sales tax to fund it."

When the questions get tough, the Town exits the conversation
It has been more than three weeks since I sent that email and there has been no response from the Town. Keep in mind that these emails have all been seen by Town Manager, Mary Jacobs, plus the mayor and six councilmembers, and not one of them has taken the time to explain the Town’s rationale for placing taxpayers so low on the priority list and allowing golf members and golf course area residents to dominate the conversation.

This is one more example of both the favoritism and the incompetence of this Town. When I ask tough questions, they exit the conversation and do not respond. They will never admit when they’ve made a mistake or crossed a line.

Best for whom?
The final decision about the golf courses is supposed to be based on “what’s best for the entire community.” From what I’ve seen so far, I suspect it will actually be based on what’s best for the golf members, what’s best for residents living along the golf courses, and what’s best for a Town Council that needs to save face.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diane Peters has lived in Oro Valley since 2003, moving here to escape the humidity of the East Coast. She’s been involved in OV politics and development issues since 2006. In 2014, she organized a citizens group, Citizen Advocates of the Oro Valley General Plan, who over a 9-month period, successfully negotiated a controversial 200-acre development project. In her past life, she worked in medical research at various University Hospitals in New England. Her interests include reading, writing, nature photography, travel, art galleries, museums, and politics.

Monday, January 15, 2018

Guest View: Diane Peters ~ Town allows golf members and golf course area residents to dominate the discussion. Part 1.

Favoritism Much?
The Town has now held a total of three special “invitation only” meetings with golf members and residents living along the golf courses to get their feedback regarding the future of the golf courses. Those meetings were as follows:

Two Special Meetings for Residents living along the golf courses

May 4, 2017: Q&A Session/Workshop at the Gaslight Theater
December 12, 2017: Town Council Chambers

One Special Meeting for Golf Members

December 13, 2017: Sunset Room of the Community Center

According to the invitations, the Town believed that feedback from these two groups was “an important part of developing the final recommendation that will be presented to the mayor and town council in January 2018.”

What about the rest of us?
What about the 40,000+ taxpayers who are being forced to fund this albatross? How many special meetings have they held for “We the Taxpayers?” We never approved the purchase of the golf courses and we never approved the increase in the sales tax to fund renovations and maintenance. Where is our seat at the table?

The Town refuses to acknowledge that ALL Oro Valley taxpayers are supporting this misguided adventure, many of us unwillingly. If they are going to make all of us pay for this unwanted addition to the Town budget, then they need to give us a voice in the decision-making process.

On December 18th, I sent the following letter to Town Manager, Mary Jacobs:

"Ms. Jacobs,

Now that the Town has held one "Special Meeting" for residents living near the Town-owned golf courses (December 12th) and another "Special Meeting" for the members of the golf club (December 13th), will the Town be holding a "Special Meeting" for the General Public to also allow them to give their opinions and feedback regarding the Golf Consultant's Report?

One person living along the golf courses commented at the meeting on December 12th:

"This isn't just about golfers vs. non-golfers. It's also about homeowners living along the courses."

They left someone out. This isn't just about golfers, non-golfers, and homeowners living along the golf courses. It's also about Oro Valley taxpayers who are being forced to subsidize the recreational activities of golfers (who make up less than 1% of our population). We're sure you will agree that the taxpayer also needs to have a seat at the table."

Tomorrow: Part 2. The Town's Response

Thursday, September 21, 2017

Many signs point to the Town's illegal advocating of the Naranja Park Bond.

Last Thursday, September 14th, Axe the Tax Chair, Jim Horn, sent the following letter to the Town Manager and the Town Attorney regarding what is perceived to be the Town’s illegal advocating for the Naranja Bond via information provided on the Town website.

LOVE readers have also noticed the same advocating in hand-outs, the Open House on September 13th, and in an editorial by Oro Valley Communications Administrator, Misti Nowak published in the Oro Valley Voice this summer.


Legally, the Town is only allowed to provide education and information about the bond. They are not allowed to advocate for it.

It has been one week and there has been no response from the Town.

September 14, 2017

Town Manager, Mary Jacobs
Cc: Town Attorney, Tobin Sidles

Ms. Jacobs,

I understand that the Town cannot advocate for or against the Naranja Park Bond but can only “educate” and provide information.

However, in looking at the Project Fact Sheet on the Town Website, it appears that the Town is subliminally downplaying the cost of the Naranja Bond by using bold print for certain terminology and by omitting some of the facts. This is outlined below.

The Project Sheet begins by giving the basic facts such as what’s in the plan and that it will be paid for with a secondary property tax. However, under the heading, “What’s the cost and how will it impact residents?” it then goes on to sway voters into voting YES by placing the following words in regular print:

$17 million
secondary property tax
$1.4 million per year for 20 years

While placing the following words in bold print:

$4.50 per month to an average homeowner.

In addition, the final cost of the bond with interest is $28 million. This number has been omitted from the website. Instead, it is worded, “$1.4 million per year for 20 years.” When worded this way, the number doesn’t seem so high.

In other words, just because the website does not specifically contain the words, “Vote YES on the Naranja Park Bond” does not mean that the Town is not presenting information in a way that is designed to sway a person in that direction.

Under the heading, “Alignment with Your Voice, Our Future General Plan,” the Project Sheet states that the “Naranja Park Bond Project conforms to the 70% voter-approved 2016 Your Voice, Our Future General Plan…” This is more subliminal messaging and manipulation of the facts designed to sway voters into thinking that this proposal must be popular if it was approved by 70% of the people.

It wasn’t 70% of the town, it was 70% of the voters who cast a ballot.

Let’s look at what “70% voter-approved” really means:

Oro Valley has a population of 43,781 (U.S. Census Bureau)
Oro Valley has 30,321 registered voters. (Town of Oro Valley Website)

23,250 ballots were cast for Prop 439 – Your Voice, Our Future General Plan (11/8/16)
16,424 voted YES (70.64%)
6,826 voted NO (29.36%)

The General Plan was not approved by 70% of the total population of 43,781. It was approved by 70% of the 23,250 ballots cast which equals 16,424 residents or 37.5% of the population of Oro Valley. This is not overwhelming support.

In addition to the bond information on the Town website, if your future newspaper ads and educational meeting(s) also present a manipulation of the facts, all of this equates to free advertising for the “Vote YES on 454” PAC, which they are getting with OUR tax dollars.

The “Informational Pamphlet” that the Town will be mailing to registered Oro Valley voters about a month prior to the election is also paid for with taxpayer funds. Will this publication also be heavy on “$4.50 per month” and “70% voter approved?”

In closing, when both sides aren’t presented equally or one side is not presented at all, this could be interpreted as the Town advocating for one side over the other. If the Town presents only the positives and none of the negatives, isn’t that in effect advocating for the bond?

Yours truly,

James W. Horn
Chair, Axe the Tax PAC

Thursday, August 10, 2017

A Matter of Public Record

When the $48.6 million dollar Naranja Park Bond failed in 2008, the Town Council switched to a phased approach.

Former Oro Valley Town Manager, Greg Caton stated:
"In 2008, our voters told us they didn't want to issue bonds for a big-ticket expense, and we heard them loud and clear. Our new approach to developing Naranja Park lays down the required infrastructure, and then lets us add amenities a la carte, as funding is available, without going into debt or issuing bonds." [Source: Tucson News Now, November 2013]

Remind the Town Council of their promise. Vote NO on Prop 454 – Naranja Park Bond

Friday, May 26, 2017

Town of Oro Valley selects new Town Manager

After conducting a nationwide search for a new Town Manager, the Town of Oro Valley has chosen Mary Jacobs, the Assistant City Manager in Sierra Vista, Arizona since 2000. She will assume her new role on September 5, 2017, replacing Interim Town Manager, Danny Sharp who will then recommence his position as Chief of Police.

More information on Jacobs’ background is available in the Town Media Release. CLICK HERE

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Removing The Police Department From Oro Valley Politics (Part 2)

---

Yesterday's post gave the history behind why Chief of Police Sharp reports to the seven member town council and not to the town manager.

As we have heard so often from Council Member Mary Snider, we are Oro Valley and we are unique when it comes to our police.

Yes. We are unique when it comes to our police.  In most Arizona communities, the chief reports to the town manager for budget and evaluation purposes.  In some, the town manager can hire and fire the chief.

But, not in Oro Valley.  Instead, there is a situation in which the police have extraordinary influence and power. A situation in which they are able to assert major influence over politicians and elections.  They are able to do this because no one is responsible for monitoring and evaluating their operations or, in the present case, their spending.

Mayor Hiremath's position is that the council should not "get into the weeds", when it comes to the 2013-14 town manager recommended budget.  We ask: Who, exactly, challenges the police budget, Mr. Mayor, if you don't; because it is not Mr. Caton's responsibility to do so?  You must get "into the weeds"on the police budget, Mr. Mayor.  In 2011, you voted for that to be so.
---
Today, there is no oversight of the police budget.  It is not Town Manager Caton's job.  He has no authority to do anything that involves the police because the department does not report to him.  It is of no benefit for him to get involved without that authority. In fact, it would be political suicide.

There are only 3 members of council who have challenged the 2013-14 police budget.  That is too few to make an impact because a vote of 4 would be required.

At the May 1 council meeting, Council Member Zinkin offered some challenge to the police budget.   Council Member Garner discussed the need for greater efficiency in police spending.

Council Member Burns recommended that the council consider changing the reporting relationship of the police chief back to the the town manager, so that some significant oversight would occur.  He noted four reasons to return to the town manager police and evaluation model, a model that appears to be relatively common among Arizona communties:
  1. The Council does not adequately provide the professional oversight required;
  2. This change in the reporting relationship would remove the police department from being the political "football" that it has become;
  3. The town is being run by professionals, as Mayor Hiremath has so often noted. These professionals should oversee the police department; and
  4. Oversight by the town manager would increase the synergy, for example, resource sharing, among town departments and town resources.
Council Member Zinkin, having surveyed the reporting relationships in a number of cities and towns, agrees with Brendan.  "I intend to make it an agenda item in a future meeting."

Council Member Joe Hornat said that he is open to listening to a discussion of the pros and cons.  Hornat also voiced confidence in the management abilities of current Town Manager Caton.

Former Council Member Barry Gillaspie, the lone vote in 2011 against removing the town manager from police oversight, continues to agree with his stated position: "I still stand by the statement," Barry said during our talk with him last week.  He noted that the current set-up allows the police department to play a game of "divide and conquer" among the 7 "bosses."  Please 4 and you win!  The police department budget deserves scrutiny.  It gets no scrutiny now.
---
We don't know if the council will discuss the situation. We don't know when they will discuss it. We don't know if the council will seek to change the situation. We do know, however, that it is a worthwhile conversation because the size of the police budget and its fast growth rate deserve scrutiny on behalf of the people of Oro Valley.
---

Monday, May 13, 2013

Removing The Police Department From Oro Valley Politics (Part 1)


---
On May 1, Council Member Brendan Burns recommended that the town have the Chief of Police report to the town manager, not to the town council, as is currently the case.

This change would return the reporting structure to what it was before March 9, 2011.  Prior to that time, the Chief was appointed and terminated by the Council; however, the daily oversight and performance evaluations were completed by the Town Manager. (Source)

There is history behind why the current reporting relationship is "as it is today."

Town Manager David Andrew's had tendered a forced resignation September 2009:

On September 28, 2009, Art wrote: "It is a fact, readily admitted by the Oro Valley police, that their union representatives wanted David out. Why, you ask? For no other reason than they think---and, at this point, they damn well may be right---that they run Oro Valley. Remember, David, working for the best interests of the people of Oro Valley believed the police who have by far the biggest budget---about the same as every other department cumulatively, fought "tooth & nail" so as to not allow even one of their own to be cut back, even though other departments had to do so."

The Oro Valley Town Council held a special session on March 9, 2011.   Council Member Snider, with the seconding of Council Member Hornat, motioned to approve ordinance 11-10 of Oro Valley code section 3-2-3.

The case for making the change was presented by Council Member Mary Snider (02:59).  Sndier claimed that there was a conflict between the code and the Chief's contract. Rather than simply amending the Chief's contract to be consistent with the code, she chose to champion removing the town manager from the equation.
"Vice Mayor Snider stated that from a public policy standpoint, there is a conflict between the Code and the Chief's contract.. The Code states that the Town Council appoints the position of the Town Manager, Chief of Police and Town Attorney. She stated that in Section 3-2, the Chief of Police is appointed by and may be terminated by Town Council pursuant to employment agreement. The new language that was added in 2007 stated "daily oversight and performance evaluation shall be completed by the Town Manager." There is a conflict with the current agreement.  From a policy standpoint, the Town Code states that the Chief of Police is hired or fired by the Town Council, but is not responsible for evaluating performance.  Discrepancy is that Council is responsible for hiring but not for performance."
The change in the code resulted in assigning all responsibilities for oversight and evaluation to the 7 member council as a body.  The motion carried 6-1.

Council Member Barry Gillaspie voted "no."

"I intend to vote no on the motion. I believe that it is in the best interest of the Town Of Oro Valley for the Police Chief to report to the manager and I believe that it is workable to amend the contract of the police chief or use it as stated; so that the town council can provide policy direction both through the town manager and to the police chief. I think that [the change] overly politicizes the position. Town Councils come and go but we want stability in our police department."

So, rather than changing the Chief's contract, as Council Member Gillaspie suggested, the council opted to change the code, removing all Town Manager oversight.  Presently, the police submit their budget through the town manager. The town manager has no role in reviewing or critiquing it.

So how's it working out?

The police budget has grown from $12.1 million in FY2011-12 to a "recommended" $13.8 million in FY 2013-14.  This is an increase of 14%.  During this same time period, the rest of the general fund spending has grown 1.4%.
---