At its September 10 meeting, the Oro Valley Planning and Zoning Commission discussed proposed zoning code amendments to comply with HB 2447—state legislation that changes how municipalities review certain development requests. The Commission unanimously approved initiating the zoning code amendment process. Staff will draft specific changes, including administrative review language, and a separate effort will define objective design standards for future projects.
HB 2447 shifts roles among commission, staff, and the public
Planning and zoning commission will see a reduced load
The Commission will lose some oversight authority. Non-discretionary items such as development plans, plats, architecture, and public art will move to administrative approval. Commissioners noted this could cut a substantial portion of their traditional workload. The Commission will continue to review discretionary cases—rezonings, general plan amendments, and conditional use permits—but will no longer weigh in on many design and architectural issues.
Staff will see a larger role
Town planning staff will be required to approve code-compliant submittals, shifting most development and design reviews from public hearings to administrative decisions. Staff will also manage new processes, including at-risk grading and expedited reviews.
Public input will narrow once an application meets code
Neighborhood meetings will remain, allowing residents to comment early in the process, but once an application meets code, staff must approve it. This reduces direct community influence over outcomes compared to today’s hearing-based process.
Town council’s role will be reduced
Discretionary cases—such as rezonings, general plan amendments, and conditional use permits—will still require Commission review and Council approval. For non-discretionary items (development plans, plats, architecture, design reviews), Council will not see them. Council’s influence will be primarily up-front when adopting code amendments and refining design standards. Once standards are set, Council will not be involved in individual project approvals unless a discretionary request is included.
Board of adjustment’s role will expand
Appeals of staff administrative decisions will go to the Board of Adjustment. This makes the Board the formal venue for contesting administrative approvals, increasing its oversight role while narrowing the timing and scope of public influence compared to current hearings.
"Objective Design Standards" key...yet to be developed...not an easy task
Staff explained that proposed amendments will require consistency with the zoning code and “objective design standards”—a key focus of the Commission’s discussion. The town will develop these standards in a separate process. The standards must be specific, measurable, and not subject to interpretation. Commissioners asked what qualifies as an objective standard, including whether aesthetic elements such as color or texture could be regulated. They noted that unclear standards could limit staff’s ability to enforce Oro Valley’s design expectations.
The town will develop these standards through a separate process that is expected to include significant community involvement.
Next stepsStaff will draft the zoning code amendments, including administrative review language. They will launch a separate process to develop objective design standards that will govern future projects.
- - -
See our May 27 Article on HB2447