Thursday, February 28, 2008

Zev Cywan Comments on Terry Parish---"The Ties That Bind"

Following is a recent comment by our neighbor Zev Cywan on our posting,--- "Terry Parish: "I'm Proud To Have Business Support Me"." I thought it deserved its own posting, rather than chance some readers missing it.
Art
*************************************************************************************

Zev Cywan said...

THE TIES THAT BIND!

At some point, Terry Parish must opt that he is either on the side of the law or on the side of those who may squirm around it. It is interesting that he advocates that the donations he receives are from individuals and therefor legal but 'admits or implies' that many of those individuals are 'members' of one 'development group' or another. Terry, Terry, Terry - it is written that one CONNELY WOLFSWINKEL, a 'true player' in the RANCHO VISTOSO development, and, by virtue of the many articles documenting his wayward dealings (let alone his conviction for bank fraud), appears to be the consummate manipulator in the ways and means of 'burying' his hidden 'riches' relative to his 'stakes' in VISTOSO PARTNERS and VESTAR, too.

WOLFSWINKEL, VISTOSO PARTNERS, VESTAR - TIES THAT BIND! Want more details, just search the internet -it's all there.

According to the 'Business Journal of Phoenix' in an article dated August 24, 2001, VISTOSO PARTNERS is named as a WOLFSWINKELS' company. According to the 'Urban Land Institute', Candice WOLFSWINKEL is listed as a representative of VISTOSO PARTNERS.
According to the 'East Valley Tribune' in an article dated October 10, 2005 titled "WOLFSWINKEL pulls the strings in a family enterprise" it is written that WOLFSWINKEL has 'intricate ties/partnership' in at least one of the VESTAR centers.

According to the record of ME-SPEAK
TERRY PARISH, he admits that [much of the money he receives for his campaigns is from 'developers' but that it is legal and okay because the donations are 'laundered' (my term) through individuals]. He continues that he is a proponent of said developers for the benefit of Oro Valley. Terry, were you elected to represent the people of Oro Valley and beholden to represent ALL of us, or were you elected to act yourself out as a hired gun for the development clique that has inundated it? What qualifications do you have that ordain you as the master planner for this Town? Who elected you as the authority on what this Town needs? What degree qualifies YOU to have become the wizard of those economic responsibilities necessary for the 'running' of a town, especially when you seem to bury your head in the sand when it comes to the realities that face us in these economic times? You wanted retail, you got empty storefronts all over town, and a snail-paced construction of the Oro Valley Marketplace (what, no tenants?) anchored by a Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer rated 'worst in customer satisfaction' in the 'departments and discount stores' category (statistics published by Market Watch and compiled by the recognized ASCI, American Customer Service Index). As an aside but necessary to mention, The Naranja Town Site is initially going to be nothing more than an ill-advised coagulation of a 'sports' complex with dreams of more future pie-in-the-sky facilities; we simply can't afford it, and even if there is a vote to 'get it started', we still can't afford it. And, those of us who do not use soccer fields, baseball fields, tether ball whatevers, tennis courts, etc., may have to pay for them but we'll never receive the benefits; where's the balance? River Park - my having visited it several times and at many different hours, I rarely see anything more than sporadic use at any given time; the maintenance is ordinary, the grounds so-so, and the bathrooms are abominable. So, now it's more, more, more for the kids and nothing for the seniors even though a Tucson area study expects a 75/25 growth ratio in favor of senior citizens; so much for the cry of "demographic change".

Terry Parish, either you can be a squeaky clean law enforcement officer and Town participant, or you can be perceived as an on-the-take small town politician; you just can't be both or you could wind up being labeled as an on-the-take law enforcement officer. You cannot wield the power of law on the one hand and then associate yourself with those who would muck up the law with the other. Your vision of the future is naive, your ways of getting there are reckless, you are dealing with a situation that is way over your head, and your pursuits within
THE TIES THAT BIND are of great concern.

VISTOSO PARTNERS is the developer of RANCH VISTOSO.

VESTAR is the developer of shopping centers including THE ORO VALLEY MARKETPLACE within the Planned Area Development, RANCHO VISTOSO.

CONNELY WOLFSWINKEL is a convicted felon who was most seriously involved in a hundred million dollar+ bank fraud in the mid
1980s, a person who the government claims still owes them (us, We the People) over one billion dollars + interest, a person who has woven strings of deals that exclude his 'ownership' by his 'bobbing and weaving' through family entities; a person depicted as being embedded in relationships with BOTH RANCHO VISTOSO and VESTAR (want to really 'get it', simply type in the name WOLFSWINKEL in your search engine and read the postings).

TERRY PARISH deems himself as a bridge for [moving this town forward] and he defends his relationships with developers as his means to his ends. What exactly are they?

TIES THAT BIND are not a good thing here.

7 comments:

mscoyote said...

Zev,
Thanks for posting this information
about Wolfswinkel. Many people have no idea of the Wolfswinkel connection with Rancho Vistoso. If I recall there is also some connection with Wolfswinkel, Rancho Vistoso and the Keating scandel. Many in OV have no idea about any of this. Yes all people have to do is use google, go in the archives of papers, etc and you will find out all sorts of info
Shortly after moving to OV, I read a lot of the archives on the Tucson Weekly.
What truly bothers me is why our town still deals with those who have ties with the Wolfswinkel family. Vistoso Partners is supposedly not run by the Wolfswinel's anymore. But I think that he is still involved, maybe just not officially listed as an owner or officer. I read that he is also involved as some type of consultant on the Vestar shopping center deal.
Is the whole town up for grabs?
Again , Zev Thank You.
Hope this gets more to become interested and wake up.

Zev Cywan said...

mscoyote
Thank you for your indulgence. According to a list published by the Urban Land Institute, copyrighted in 2008, Candice Wolfswinkel is still listed as a 'representative' for Vistoso Partners. As to THE Wolfswinkel's involvement in Vestar, it is alleged that his 'interest' in one of the shopping centers is 'woven' into some type of family trust, burying his possible (probable?) ownership within it. I do not have any direct knowledge of his involvement. Understand that he most probably 'cannot' have any assets in his name because of potential seizure as a result of his legal entanglements. I am only speculating on this as a citizen layperson; I am not in the legal profession and do not have any legal authority as to the absolute veracity of this comment.

Native Spirit said...

Zev,

Thanks for your research, your clarity in drawing the inferences that most can't or don't want to see, and calling TP to account for his actions.

Brilliant!

Anonymous said...

Yes Wolfswinkel was involved with Keating.

I would like to know HOW Terry Parish reconciles this with his law enforcement claims?

PARISH.. You are in way over your head, I don't think you can get out of this, as we all know that the campaign funds you are receiving has a hefty price tag attached....

THINK, why are they giving you this money, WHAT will they want from me in the future?

IS it a price that I am willing to pay?

What if you DON'T do what they are asking?

Could not complying with their wishes be putting your family and yourself be in DANGER?

Anonymous said...

Please see article below regarding only ONE deal between Keating and Wolfswinkle...

Time Magazine via www.time.com
Fall of The Mighty
Monday, Jul. 20, 1992

LINCOLN SAVINGS. A federal jury in Tucson awarded $3 billion in damages against Charles Keating Jr. and three co-defendants for swindling thousands of savings and loan investors. The huge award may end up being more a symbol of public anger about the S&L debacle than a collectible judgment. The jury found that developer Conley Wolfswinkel, the Saudi European Investment Corp. and Continental Southern conspired with Keating and officers in American Continental and its Lincoln Savings subsidiary to mislead government ( regulators. Keating, 68, is in prison in California on state criminal charges stemming from the same transactions.

Native Spirit said...

Another thought...those of us who received the 2008-09 "Notice of Value" yesterday, might consider a class action lawsuit directed at Harpold's Roast and Toast, Wolfschwinkel and his wife, along with TParish...my house, a rather modest affair will devalue $36,000 in 2009 compared to the valuation in this year. To someone who is retired and living alone, that is a substantial loss. To what is that due? The building of the crematorium and Walmart so close to this subdivision. The Harpolds did not seem to factor that in when they began building their "mortuary" and W never thought of the consequences to his enormous bankroll...I know there are almost 500 like me in this subdivision and how many dwellings were affected in Catalina Shadows? Devaluation of existing property does sound like a legitimate reason for a class action lawsuit...What do you others feel about this? Greed versus concern for the citizens...Voters please take that into consideration...

Zev Cywan said...

native spirit
Though I agree that those entities that you mention may be undesirable for many of us, I cannot see them as being necessarily a definable cause that would render a CA suit as a viable action (I am speaking solely as a layperson). As a former real estate
agent (in another state), if you truly want to know, I would recommend that you have the MARKET value of your house either analyzed by a competent Realtor or an appraiser, both results being strictly 'OPINIONS of value'. I have found over the years that assessed values are of little use in determining REAL value. A good example of that is the county from which I moved reassessed every 8years only - talk about fluctuations in differentials - whew! It is said that the TRUE value of anything is what one party is willing to pay for it and the other is willing to sell it for. My assessment went up a little even though I know that the market in my area has 'softened' a bit resulting in a slight drop in the selling prices of the homes around me.

You may check with the assessor's office and ask why the 'dip'. I doubt that The County would lower the 'value' of your home unless your property has been directly affected by some 'material fact' about which The County is 'keenly' aware; I doubt that they would lower your value based on a general assumption.

But, native spirit, keep up the support, the commentary, and THE FIGHT!