To its credit the "yes" folks PAC on The Naranja Park got their letter writers out, and there are no less than 5 letters espousing the park's virtues.
I'm sure we can expect this "blitz" to continue in the weeks prior to the election.
As we've been saying constantly, a park for our youth is a good thing. I don't know anyone that wants to deprive the kids some fields & courts to play on-----but 42 is overkill!
Remember, Oro Valley, like all of us, have WANTS & NEEDS.
This park is a luxury we DO NOT NEED, especially in this unprecedented terrible economic time.
Read the letters, and then do the right thing for yourself, for your neighbors and for the town
VOTE "NO ON NARANJA BOND ISSUE!
ADDENDUM: PLEASE BE SURE TO READ THE 1st COMMENT BELOW BY "COMMON SENSE THINKER"
http://www.explorernews.com/articles/2008/10/15/opinion/doc48f53c784fdae997492093.txt
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Oro Valley P & Z Approves Arroyo Grande General Plan Ammendment
As reported in The Explorer, the Planning & Zoning Commission last week approved the General Plan Amendment allowing the town to annex Arroyo Grande.
The OV Council will next take up this issue.
Too bad, the initiative to not develop the land never got to the ballot. Hopefully, the people will get an opportunity to speak, and this land will, for the most part, remain open space.
We'll have to see how things proceed.
http://www.explorernews.com/articles/2008/10/15/news/doc48f543379bf5b185451321.txt
The OV Council will next take up this issue.
Too bad, the initiative to not develop the land never got to the ballot. Hopefully, the people will get an opportunity to speak, and this land will, for the most part, remain open space.
We'll have to see how things proceed.
http://www.explorernews.com/articles/2008/10/15/news/doc48f543379bf5b185451321.txt
Court of Appeals Will Hear City North Giveaway Case On Nov. 25
We couldn't agree more with our friend Clint Bolick. We can only hope we don't echo these sentiments here in Oro Valley with Vestar's Marketplace, which, if nothing else will be an eyesore on both our scenic corridors---Oracle & Tangerine roads. We already know we're not getting anything close to a "unique, upscale" shopping experience.
We hope the Court of Appeals in Phoenix applies the law and overturns the lower court ruling.
We hope the Court of Appeals in Phoenix applies the law and overturns the lower court ruling.
| | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The case made for the $97.4 million taxpayer subsidy to the developer was that the shopping mall could not be built without it. But the record in the Goldwater Institute lawsuit 