In an article in the Oct. 7 Az Star, OV neighbor John Musolf raises that question. Although town officials say it's all legal because the town is educating residents, not promoting the bond, any reasonable person would have to question the fact that an outside consulting firm was hired and paid $50,000 to "educate us" on why we would want a property tax.
With municipalities curtailing funding of road projects, hospitals, schools and other needs, we have to question the sanity of financing an over zealous park in these trying times.
Many of us have received our early ballots. We implore all Oro Valley voters to consider the fact that this park includes more than 40 fields & courts. Do we need all that?
Allow this present council to evaluate our needs, and come back with a more moderate plan.
VOTE "NO" On Naranja Bond.
You can read the Az Star article here
http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/261107.php
